Niang
Oubre
Cody Martin
Mathurin

Conley
Thybulle
Mitchell Robinson
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
German Athens wrote:Some DPE targets:
Niang
Oubre
Cody Martin
Mathurin![]()
Conley
Thybulle
Mitchell Robinson
soxperry wrote:German Athens wrote:Some DPE targets:
Niang
Oubre
Cody Martin
Mathurin![]()
Conley
Thybulle
Mitchell Robinson
would be a waste to use it on any of those guys other than Mathurin...but then he would have to be happy only getting the mle the following year as thats the max we could pay him.
RiotPunch wrote:tedbrogen wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:We have 4 trade exceptions that expire 2/6/25.
$7.2 million
$2.1 million
$793k
$266k
"Exceptions are essentially "grants" offering teams an additional way to sign players. Exceptions can be split up for multiple player signings, however only one of these exceptions may be used in a season and they cannot be combined."
Obviously the best use of those is to take on a player a team needs to dump for apron purposes but can they also use them in a S&T for a player? Can they use them to outright sign a player? Or in combination with other players to aggregate salary in a larger deal?
Justin Garcia seems to think you can use a TPE to sign a player, but I don't trust him. emunney? GAD?
RiotPunch wrote:
Justin Garcia seems to think you can use a TPE to sign a player, but I don't trust him. emunney? GAD?
JayMKE wrote:I’m under the impression that Dame if the surgery and rehab is a success might be ready to go for the playoffs next season, idk what we could expect from him realistically tho
Bernman wrote:The BAE also hard caps us at the 1st apron, so we might be averse to use it. They don't want back over the 2nd apron, but over the 1st the restrictions aren't nearly as bad. And it's going to be difficult not to flirt with that while getting better when you have a dead salary at over 58m.
This incentivizes them to re-sign their own guys more. Then go over the cap next yr to re-sign them for 10m each or whatever. But then we'll flirt w/ the 2nd apron at that pt. This is all a difficult balance to strike w/ the huge salaries into 2 players, again, 1 of which is even incapacitated.
soxperry wrote:Using the mle also hard caps us at first apron and that is definitely happening. Theres really no good reason to go over the first apron in the 25-26 salary year. The only guys we want to pay more, we cant. If Brook ends up costing too much we probably just let him walk. Im certainly not sacrificing a chance to let Kpj develop to keep Brook.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
SupremeHustle wrote:Random thought that none of you will care about: I think Michael Redd was more overrated than I used to think. And I thought he was overrated.
Thanks for reading, guys.
soxperry wrote:Upon looking at our salary table, the big pivot point is whether we get that injured player exception for Dame or not. If we do, it makes things very simple and we have a lot of flexibility. If not, we are likely to lose one of them. Making a trade of kuzma or pc to dump salary doesn't help this at all since we dont have bird rights on kpj or trent. It would only impact being able to pay our bird rights players more...and im not sure thats a huge priority. The one exception might be Brook if they deem him "still important."
Scenario 1: Dame is out the full year. Easy. You can now pay Kpj and Gary up to 14.1 each. One gets a multi year deal and the other gets a one year deal. There are good arguments for each, and theres an argument that we could ditch one of them if the right player is available in free agency. But thats too many variables for now.
Scenario 2: Dame thinks he can get back by playoffs and we dont access the exception. Now we can either split the mle between kpj and gary, give one the mle and the other the bae (assuming another team doesn't outbid), or give one the mle and let the other walk.
The rest of the table is pretty straightforward.
The following is Scenario 2, sans injury exception:
Guaranteed:
Giannis: 54M
Dame: 54M
Kuzma: 22M
Pat: 9M
AJ: 2.3M
Andre: 2.2M
If we assume the following (just to get a feel)
Bobby: 15M
Brook: 7M
Rollins: 5M
Sims: 2.4M
Mle: 14.1M (kpj or trent or fa)
Bae: 5.1M (fa)
One Vet Min: 2.4M
This puts us less than 100k under the first apron which we are now hard capped at due to mle and/or bae usage. So you can see how helpful the injured player exception would be, especially if we use it on kpj or gary instead of a fa. That way, it serves as a bridge to an off-season where they are now early bird eligible rather than a free agent who we would then struggle to keep.
I hope this was coherent enough. The more tried to explain the situation the more i realized how open ended it is.
Bernman wrote:soxperry wrote:Using the mle also hard caps us at first apron and that is definitely happening. Theres really no good reason to go over the first apron in the 25-26 salary year. The only guys we want to pay more, we cant. If Brook ends up costing too much we probably just let him walk. Im certainly not sacrificing a chance to let Kpj develop to keep Brook.
I see that's true, if you use over the NTMLE amount. Which means it may be tough to use all these exceptions and re-up Bobby. They're at 141 alone, between Giannis, Dame, Kuz, & Pat. The projected 1st apron is 196.
MLE is 14 more. That's 155. BAE gets you to 160. The TPE to 167. That's maybe only 7 players. You need 8 more for a full roster. Let's say each gets minimums for around 2.5m average. That's 187, w/out Bobby, who takes you over.
You have to let Brook go. Maybe Bobby, unless you can't find a big for part/all of your MLE. Forego the TPE. And try to sneak 1-2 guys on fake minimums, w/ the handshake deal you'll get them next year, so you don't have half of a roster of genuine minimums. Makes it tough for depth.
LUKE23 wrote:RiotPunch wrote:
Justin Garcia seems to think you can use a TPE to sign a player, but I don't trust him. emunney? GAD?
No, the TPE can be traded for a player up to the salary of the TPE ($7.2M).
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Iheartfootball wrote:emunney wrote:BigO wrote:
I don't think this is close to true, especially after the job Bud did in Phoenix.
I'm not saying you could get a great coach (not many of them), but certainly you could get one not as rigid as Bud or Doc.
You have Frank Vogel sitting out there who was canned in LA after doing a good job and who was canned in Phoenix after doing a good job. Both replacements for him were abysmal.
So I'd take Vogel in a heart beat or I'd try and find someone who has some hstory of changing defenses and offenses and isn't tied to lineups (all of these are the definition of Spoelstra).
Of course, having flexibility, while a prerequisite, isn't sufficient. Otherwise, we should have hired Nurse.
I truly hate to jump to Doc's defense here but I don't think he's rigid. I know it was obvious to all of us, but in the world of NBA coaching, changing the lineup and rotation like he did vs Indiana in reaction to the *April* emergence of a synergistic lineup is actually pretty radical. End of year interviews, I'm getting to the bottom of who pushed him to do that, and they're on my shortlist for next HC.
How about Doc's not rigid, but he's stubborn? You gotta have an ego to coach in this league and it can get the best of him often.