Wonka wrote:That smile is actually very unsettling. Almost in a Pennywise the Dancing Clown way
LOL
Right on!
He is looking at you.
He is thinking "Yeah, I know what you did. You know I do."
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
Wonka wrote:That smile is actually very unsettling. Almost in a Pennywise the Dancing Clown way
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
SupremeHustle wrote:"Whatever the front office can do to make us a championship team, it can happen. If it's me getting traded..."
Go to Bucks Twitter if you can't view this.
Perishable517 wrote:Wonka wrote:That smile is actually very unsettling. Almost in a Pennywise the Dancing Clown way
LOL
Right on!
He is looking at you.
He is thinking "Yeah, I know what you did. You know I do."
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Buck Dweller wrote:i remember aussie buck one time saying that we all have our bad moments on this board. well this one belongs to sid and jtk.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
econniption wrote:SupremeHustle wrote:"Whatever the front office can do to make us a championship team, it can happen. If it's me getting traded..."
Go to Bucks Twitter if you can't view this.
I'm surprised "Giannis demands trade from Bucks" isn't on ESPN's front page right now.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
sidney lanier wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:Questions for Sidney and Oldskool.
Do you guys think Kidd was in the top 25% of coaches?
Do you think Kidd did not have significant input in personnel decisions?
Second question first: I think he had input. I would also agree with your implicit assumption that as a talent evaluator he left a lot to be desired. But it's probably disingenuous to pin all the bad personnel decisions this organization has made in the last four years to him.
Top 25%? I don't know what criteria to apply to make such a ranking. As I've often observed with respect to NBA coaches and organizations generally, most will make the same decisions when presented with the same situations, so there's not a lot to choose among them. He's made lots of in-game bloopers that a Popovich would not make, but with respect to the things that relate to ownership of the future -- player development, players learning how to be "pros," etc., I think he gets a passing grade. Did his non-interventionist approach (which is what it clearly was despite opinions to the contrary) accelerate Giannis's ability to learn the NBA game in a way that a more structured program would not have? I'd say probably yes.
xTitan wrote:There are a couple of points I'd like to touch on after reading several pages of this thread...
You people are way to hard on Sweeney, he is very well thought of as a defensive coach and like all good coaches he could teach several different defenses that would work successfully depending on your personnel. The defense the Bucks employed was Kidd's choice, the lack of flexibility and change was Kidd's choice.
I think everyone is missing the real story at this point, am I the only one who finds it extremely interesting that Lasry and Dinan have yet to comment at all? We all saw the disfunction last summer during the GM debacle, I'm not sure this group can stay together moving forward, have a feeling we are going to hear stories about a possible split moving forward, not sure who I'd actually want to stay.
xTitan wrote:There are a couple of points I'd like to touch on after reading several pages of this thread...
You people are way to hard on Sweeney, he is very well thought of as a defensive coach and like all good coaches he could teach several different defenses that would work successfully depending on your personnel. The defense the Bucks employed was Kidd's choice, the lack of flexibility and change was Kidd's choice.
I think everyone is missing the real story at this point, am I the only one who finds it extremely interesting that Lasry and Dinan have yet to comment at all? We all saw the disfunction last summer during the GM debacle, I'm not sure this group can stay together moving forward, have a feeling we are going to hear stories about a possible split moving forward, not sure who I'd actually want to stay.
emunney wrote:(FWIW, everybody has Capel taking over for K when he hangs up the clipboard, but I think it's 100% going to be Scheyer)

Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
sidney lanier wrote:emunney wrote:I think Kidd brought some credibility to the team among players that we no longer need because Giannis overshadows everything.
Kidd's parting shot took credit for putting the Bucks on the map, and I think in fairness you have to acknowledge that there's something there. And while it's painful for Kidd haters to acknowledge that what may have been the fastest, most pronounced four-year improvement curve of any NBA player in history took place on his watch, it did. Would it have happened anyway? Did Kidd's connections and his ability to bring in special guest tutors foster it? Did Kidd's standing as a future HOFer add weight to the necessary lessons of basketball neophyte Giannis? Did he have a hand in Giannis's physicial development, his motivation, the way he now plays?
All unknowns that are answered a little too glibly in the negative by Kidd haters.
Fresh_Prince12 wrote:Giannis seemed pissed that Kidd leaked he got a call from him
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
emunney wrote:(FWIW, everybody has Capel taking over for K when he hangs up the clipboard, but I think it's 100% going to be Scheyer)

crkone wrote:Anyone read Sweeney's book?
https://www.amazon.com/101-Plays-Play-Offs-Se%C3%A1n-Sweeney/dp/1463520433
SupremeHustle wrote:"Whatever the front office can do to make us a championship team, it can happen. If it's me getting traded..."
Go to Bucks Twitter if you can't view this.