ImageImage

PG 2: 1-1

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,619
And1: 6,458
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: PG 2: 1-1 

Post#181 » by CharityStripe34 » Thu May 5, 2022 2:54 pm

BigO wrote:Wish I could give an evaluation of the game, but I didn't watch it. I taped it, because I couldn't watch it live and then inadvertently saw they were blown out and couldn't force myself to watch the replay. My hope is that with 3 days of going over tapes, there will be adjustments.

Although reading some of the analysis here, it sounds like some posters think the game was all about who was hitting open shots and who wasn't.

Reading that Giannis started 1-10 and seeing his inefficiency the first game, I think Boston's defense has something to do with that. Giannis's usual shooting efficiency makes up for a lot of mediocre shooting by everyone else. I trust Giannis will figure it out.


The first quarter doomed the game from both Gianni and Jrue. They inexplicably tried to go iso and play hero ball for whatever reason, Boston (especially Brown) started white hot from three and the lead became insurmountable. Even despite some better adjustments after halftime (Bucks actually won the second half).

It was just really strange that the Big Two weren't really running offense despite the others going 9/12. Their ball-stopping ruined any chance of flow until it was much too late. Every time the Bucks threatened to get the lead to around 10 the Celtics would get a boneheaded turnover from them and hit some timely corner threes.

Basically it seemed like Milwaukee was content with the split and failed to come out with the same type of energy and rhythm. Boston came out flying around the court and moving the ball and played very good D.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
User avatar
SirChurros
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,577
And1: 4,257
Joined: Apr 02, 2015
   

Re: PG 2: 1-1 

Post#182 » by SirChurros » Thu May 5, 2022 3:06 pm

emunney wrote:Punting on PJ is Horst's Tobes trade.
PJ Tucker wouldn't have made any difference in Game 2.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,945
And1: 41,335
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: PG 2: 1-1 

Post#183 » by emunney » Thu May 5, 2022 3:37 pm

Krispy Kreme wrote:
emunney wrote:Punting on PJ is Horst's Tobes trade.
PJ Tucker wouldn't have made any difference in Game 2.


Neither would Tobes have.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
BigO
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,219
And1: 4,760
Joined: Jul 07, 2014
Location: Old Folks Home
   

Re: PG 2: 1-1 

Post#184 » by BigO » Thu May 5, 2022 7:19 pm

Krispy Kreme wrote:
emunney wrote:Punting on PJ is Horst's Tobes trade.
PJ Tucker wouldn't have made any difference in Game 2.

Both these things are probably true.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks