Ron Swanson wrote:They're taking a valid point (contracts don't really matter anymore) but just selectively applying it. Again, does anyone think that if Boston flames out in the 2nd round, that there's going to be any chatter in the media discourse about Jayson Tatum "asking out" or "will he sign the extension"? Of course there won't be. The irony that Boston has literally never recruited a big-name free agent (Gordon Hayward lulz) in the modern era will be completely lost on them.
You hit the nail on the head with this point. People see ESPN's agenda with Giannis because Giannis is the only superstar that they do this to.
What if the Bucks have a bad year, sure it's possible.
But if Giannis played for the Celtics and the Celtics had just traded for Damien Lillard, we all know that there's not a chance in hell Windy says something like that.
If Giannis and Dame teamed up on the Boston Celtics, not a single person in the media would even entertain the idea that Boston
Might have a bad year for a nano second.
The Bucks don't have the assets to acquire Dame.Giannis' next contract won't be with the BucksThe massive
**** you Jon Horst & Giannis just gave to the national media over the past 30 days is beyond awesome.
That's why I said yesterday that this is already one of my all-time favorite seasons as a Bucks fan and we haven't even played a single game yet....lol.