ImageImage

Bucks ownership: Lowe/Windhorst ESPN piece pg 5

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

wisportsfan4
Junior
Posts: 314
And1: 88
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#21 » by wisportsfan4 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:00 am

Max Green wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
Max Green wrote:Overall I think they are doing a good job so far. Sure they've made some mistakes and could've done things better, but at the end of the day this franchise is in a much better place now then it was 3 years ago under Kohl.


How have they done a good job basketball wise?


They let Hammond go. Had winning seasons 2 out of their first 3 years after inheriting a 15-win team. Actually convinced a big name free agent to come to Milwaukee.


Lest I remind you one player Hammond (not new owners) brought in: Giannis.

Read on Twitter
User avatar
econniption
Rookie
Posts: 1,012
And1: 1,138
Joined: Apr 05, 2016
Location: OC CA
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#22 » by econniption » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:04 am

Max Green wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
Max Green wrote:Overall I think they are doing a good job so far. Sure they've made some mistakes and could've done things better, but at the end of the day this franchise is in a much better place now then it was 3 years ago under Kohl.


How have they done a good job basketball wise?


They let Hammond go. Had winning seasons 2 out of their first 3 years after inheriting a 15-win team. Actually convinced a big name free agent to come to Milwaukee.


They may have let Hammond go with a year left on his contract, but they most likely replaced him with Hammond lite. They had one barely-winning season, one .500 season, and one 33-win season in three years because of the ascension of a player that they inherited. Monroe may have been a big name at the time, but he's not exactly a star and the "big name free agent" hasn't put the Bucks over the top.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,044
And1: 4,142
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#23 » by DanoMac » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:05 am

We're on a completely different tier than so many other teams when it comes to professionalism and just overall business. The owners come in and set it up as a platform for their daughters to become social media famous and their son to get a front office gig. Really embarrassing.
User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 3,247
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#24 » by LittleRooster » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:09 am

Max Green wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
Max Green wrote:Overall I think they are doing a good job so far. Sure they've made some mistakes and could've done things better, but at the end of the day this franchise is in a much better place now then it was 3 years ago under Kohl.


How have they done a good job basketball wise?


They let Hammond go. Had winning seasons 2 out of their first 3 years after inheriting a 15-win team. Actually convinced a big name free agent to come to Milwaukee.


They "let" Hammond go when he wanted to interview in Orlando. Then, they didn't have a plan for his departure.
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,953
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#25 » by VooDoo7 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:09 am

Another big problem is our pussy local media who doesn't hold the team to a higher standard, like they do with the Packers. Anytime the franchise does something stupid or questionable, everybody turns their cheek. No questioning them during interviews. No newspaper articles. Nothing.

They are never held accountable by the media or the casual fans.
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,953
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#26 » by VooDoo7 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:11 am

LittleRooster wrote:
Max Green wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
How have they done a good job basketball wise?


They let Hammond go. Had winning seasons 2 out of their first 3 years after inheriting a 15-win team. Actually convinced a big name free agent to come to Milwaukee.


They "let" Hammond go when he wanted to interview in Orlando. Then, they didn't have a plan for his departure.

Exactly.

This is like people giving Hammond credit for the Jennings/Mids trade, ignoring the fact that he offered Jennings a contract but he turned it down.
User avatar
Bucknado
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,593
And1: 1,274
Joined: Jul 12, 2013
 

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#27 » by Bucknado » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:12 am

I remember thinking how cool the Nets were. New billionaire business man owner, new arena, new unis, etc. When LED came in I had a similar feeling. I hope we don't have a similar fate.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,044
And1: 4,142
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#28 » by DanoMac » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:14 am

VooDoo7 wrote:Another big problem is our pussy local media who doesn't hold the team to a higher standard, like they do with the Packers. Anytime the franchise does something stupid or questionable, everybody turns their cheek. No questioning them during interviews. No newspaper articles. Nothing.


Yep. This. The organization has the media by the balls. It's disgusting.

And I'd rather the casual fan not call them out. Last time they did, it was when we traded the PPGz Brandon Knight.
User avatar
econniption
Rookie
Posts: 1,012
And1: 1,138
Joined: Apr 05, 2016
Location: OC CA
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#29 » by econniption » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:14 am

Bucknado wrote:I remember thinking how cool the Nets were. New billionaire business man owner, new arena, new unis, etc. When LED came in I had a similar feeling. I hope we don't have a similar fate.


Unfortunately, we have some ties to that Nets organization (Lasry, Kidd, Thorn).
User avatar
LittleRooster
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 3,247
Joined: Apr 02, 2010
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#30 » by LittleRooster » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:15 am

VooDoo7 wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
Max Green wrote:
They let Hammond go. Had winning seasons 2 out of their first 3 years after inheriting a 15-win team. Actually convinced a big name free agent to come to Milwaukee.


They "let" Hammond go when he wanted to interview in Orlando. Then, they didn't have a plan for his departure.

Exactly.

This is like people giving Hammond credit for the Jennings/Mids trade, ignoring the fact that he offered Jennings a contract but he turned it down.


Well, that still was a good trade :D
NomNomNomParker
Starter
Posts: 2,389
And1: 1,248
Joined: Nov 06, 2014
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#31 » by NomNomNomParker » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:16 am

DanoMac wrote:
VooDoo7 wrote:Another big problem is our pussy local media who doesn't hold the team to a higher standard, like they do with the Packers. Anytime the franchise does something stupid or questionable, everybody turns their cheek. No questioning them during interviews. No newspaper articles. Nothing.


Yep. This. The organization has the media by the balls. It's disgusting.

And I'd rather the casual fan not call them out. Last time they did, it was when we traded the PPGz Brandon Knight.


Sports media in Wisconsin generally only care about the packers... Their isn't enough knowledge locally on the Bucks and no one with any balls.
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,044
And1: 4,142
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#32 » by DanoMac » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:20 am

NomNomNomParker wrote:Sports media in Wisconsin generally only care about the packers... Their isn't enough knowledge locally on the Bucks and no one with any balls.


Right, it's Packers all year. I think some of the guys that work for JS and OnMilwaukee have a decent amount of knowledge, I just think that they're afraid to truly voice their opinion in fear of being black balled. No one calls them out because of the possible repercussions. Whenever there's a Bucks article, it's an absolute fluff piece. Save for some Woelful stuff.
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,953
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#33 » by VooDoo7 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:21 am

LittleRooster wrote:
VooDoo7 wrote:
LittleRooster wrote:
They "let" Hammond go when he wanted to interview in Orlando. Then, they didn't have a plan for his departure.

Exactly.

This is like people giving Hammond credit for the Jennings/Mids trade, ignoring the fact that he offered Jennings a contract but he turned it down.


Well, that still was a good trade :D

Absolutely. But it only happened because Jennings turned down the contract Hammond offered him. Hard for me to give him much credit because of that.
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,953
And1: 22,257
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#34 » by VooDoo7 » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:23 am

DanoMac wrote:
NomNomNomParker wrote:Sports media in Wisconsin generally only care about the packers... Their isn't enough knowledge locally on the Bucks and no one with any balls.


Right, it's Packers all year. I think some of the guys that work for JS and OnMilwaukee have a decent amount of knowledge, I just think that they're afraid to truly voice their opinion in fear of being black balled. No one calls them out because of the possible repercussions. Whenever there's a Bucks article, it's an absolute fluff piece. Save for some Woelful stuff.

I just don't get why they're intimidated by them. It's the **** Bucks. One of the most irrelevant sports teams over the past 30 years. A team most people in this state could give two **** about.

If anything, you'd think they'd be worried about pissing the Packer organization off more.
User avatar
Prez
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 27,249
And1: 44,432
Joined: Jan 26, 2015
 

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#35 » by Prez » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:26 am

DanoMac wrote:
NomNomNomParker wrote:Sports media in Wisconsin generally only care about the packers... Their isn't enough knowledge locally on the Bucks and no one with any balls.


Right, it's Packers all year. I think some of the guys that work for JS and OnMilwaukee have a decent amount of knowledge, I just think that they're afraid to truly voice their opinion in fear of being black balled. No one calls them out because of the possible repercussions. Whenever there's a Bucks article, it's an absolute fluff piece. Save for some Woelful stuff.

It's gonna change pretty quickly. Everything is going to be under the microscope when Giannis becomes a megastar. The local media being afraid won't matter when the national media is roasting the franchise. You can already see guys like Woj picking up on it and throwing jabs at ownership, it's going to reach a new level next year. This **** won't fly for long.
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,759
And1: 5,814
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#36 » by Iheartfootball » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:35 am

Hedge fund owners. I honestly thought the two of em had a heart. Apparently they aren't just caricatures in Michael Lewis's books. They are Neanderthal cave people that love the thrill of the hunt but when they can't understand something they just through it away and chase a different shiny object.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
User avatar
Zeezprah
Analyst
Posts: 3,539
And1: 1,569
Joined: Apr 16, 2014
Location: How can the Bucks be real if our eyes aren't real?
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#37 » by Zeezprah » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:36 am

think they've done pretty well on the business-side of things (ultimately this is a business), but on the basketball-side, it's been pretty dang disappointing. our situation roster-wise has only gotten worse and any winning we've done was basically because we have giannis.

like has already been said a trillion times, hire good people (experts) to work for you and have them make the decisions. this is how all good businesses operate.

think if we'd admit we need to reset on the roster, i'd feel better about things, but right now it's looking like we're just going to re-sign snell for 4 years and try to beat the warriors/field with this roster as-is. or in another way of thinking, this will be the roster to support prime giannis. not a great decision imo. it's eeriely similar to some of the rosters lebron had to deal with early on in cleveland.

worst i've felt about our situation in awhile.
User avatar
Iheartfootball
Head Coach
Posts: 6,759
And1: 5,814
Joined: May 09, 2014
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#38 » by Iheartfootball » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:38 am

[quote="Iheartfootball"]Hedge fund owners. I honestly thought the two of em had a heart. Apparently they aren't just caricatures in Michael Lewis's books. They are Neanderthal cave people that love the thrill of the hunt but when they can't understand something they just through it away and chase a different shiny object.

Someone insert the G.O.T. shame clip.

There's the billboard. Just a bell with with their picture on it and the word SHAME.
Everybody wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to die.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 103,569
And1: 55,893
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#39 » by MickeyDavis » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:41 am

I don't care about their personal life or what they do in their other businesses. All I care about is the basketball side of the Bucks. They have been a big disappointment in that regard.

I didn't expect them to be experts at running a successful NBA franchise. I DID expect them to hire people who were. They haven't.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
Erifee
Senior
Posts: 627
And1: 305
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Your view of Bucks ownership 

Post#40 » by Erifee » Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:42 am

I would cut the owners a lot more slack if they had paid for their own arena.
MilBucksBackOnTop06 wrote:His Suns about 5 or 6 years ago came close to getting to the Finals who got ripped off in that one playoff series when he was thrown across a table by Robert Horry who you might also consider an excellent core piece.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks