smooth 'lil balla wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait a minute here. Pressey in the trade thread a few weeks ago didn't allow us to make bogut deals because he said it's not possible. Pressey should be fired!
Hey, call it my Joe Alexander draft moment.

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
smooth 'lil balla wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait a minute here. Pressey in the trade thread a few weeks ago didn't allow us to make bogut deals because he said it's not possible. Pressey should be fired!
europa wrote:Bogut is being blamed for much of what is wrong with this team in an effort to protect/isolate Jennings from blame (and therefore deflecting blame from Hammonds), thereby coddling him more and hoping he doesn't want to leave.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
paul wrote:smooth 'lil balla wrote:europa wrote:I'll withhold judgment on any Bogut deals until one actually goes down. I will repeat what I posted a few weeks ago - the anti-Bogut sentiment is growing stronger and stronger within the team. I'm fine with trading Bogut for a few reasons (none performance related really) but the anti-Bogut vibe is baffling to me on a number of levels. My take - and this is only my take - is that Bogut is being blamed for much of what is wrong with this team in an effort to protect/isolate Jennings from blame, thereby coddling him more and hoping he doesn't want to leave.
I'm a big fan of yours Europa, but that just doesn't make sense. Jennings plays in 90% of our games and is our closest all star. Bogut has played in less than 50% of our games the last three years and has never lived up to his promise. To say this is coddling Jennings is to turn your head on the failure that Andrew Bogut has become...And I like Bogut.Wowzers. I'm no mathematician but Bogut has played in 146 of a possible 203 games the past 3 seasons including this one - or about 72% of possible games. That number will go down a little more over the next couple of weeks, but not that much. Less than 50%? Have you been getting your statistics from Woelful?
paul wrote::o Wowzers. I'm no mathematician but Bogut has played in 146 of a possible 203 games the past 3 seasons including this one - or about 72% of possible games. That number will go down a little more over the next couple of weeks, but not that much. Less than 50%? Have you been getting your statistics from Woelful?
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
smooth 'lil balla wrote:europa wrote:I'll withhold judgment on any Bogut deals until one actually goes down. I will repeat what I posted a few weeks ago - the anti-Bogut sentiment is growing stronger and stronger within the team. I'm fine with trading Bogut for a few reasons (none performance related really) but the anti-Bogut vibe is baffling to me on a number of levels. My take - and this is only my take - is that Bogut is being blamed for much of what is wrong with this team in an effort to protect/isolate Jennings from blame, thereby coddling him more and hoping he doesn't want to leave.
I'm a big fan of yours Europa, but that just doesn't make sense. Jennings plays in 90% of our games and is our closest all star. Bogut has played in less than 50% of our games the last three years and has never lived up to his promise. To say this is coddling Jennings is to turn your head on the failure that Andrew Bogut has become...And I like Bogut.
REDDzone wrote:paul wrote::o Wowzers. I'm no mathematician but Bogut has played in 146 of a possible 203 games the past 3 seasons including this one - or about 72% of possible games. That number will go down a little more over the next couple of weeks, but not that much. Less than 50%? Have you been getting your statistics from Woelful?
The guy just called himself a "big fan" of a message board poster, and the made up statistic (which is 92.46% of ALL statistics) is what caught your eye?
JimmyTheKid wrote:Just so I'm clear, the resident "insiders" with connections to Bucks' decision makers are europa and buckpack? Is that right?
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
JimmyTheKid wrote:smooth 'lil balla wrote:europa wrote:I'll withhold judgment on any Bogut deals until one actually goes down. I will repeat what I posted a few weeks ago - the anti-Bogut sentiment is growing stronger and stronger within the team. I'm fine with trading Bogut for a few reasons (none performance related really) but the anti-Bogut vibe is baffling to me on a number of levels. My take - and this is only my take - is that Bogut is being blamed for much of what is wrong with this team in an effort to protect/isolate Jennings from blame, thereby coddling him more and hoping he doesn't want to leave.
I'm a big fan of yours Europa, but that just doesn't make sense. Jennings plays in 90% of our games and is our closest all star. Bogut has played in less than 50% of our games the last three years and has never lived up to his promise. To say this is coddling Jennings is to turn your head on the failure that Andrew Bogut has become...And I like Bogut.
Doesn't make any sense to me either. I'm guessing the growing anti-Bogut sentiment is due to his inability to stay on the court and has nothing to do with Jennings. As far as the blame game is concerned, its not Bogut's fault he's injury prone. Unfortunately, as a result, the three highest paid players on the team combine for 17 minutes of court time per game. And all of those minutes go to an unhappy backup PG. Plenty of blame to go around.
paulpressey25 wrote:assuming he doesn't play this regular season.
REDDzone wrote:europa wrote:Bogut is being blamed for much of what is wrong with this team in an effort to protect/isolate Jennings from blame (and therefore deflecting blame from Hammonds), thereby coddling him more and hoping he doesn't want to leave.
Fixed.
- Bucks "Outsider"
Bogut, the No. 1 overall pick in the 2005 NBA draft, has never publicly expressed any displeasure playing in small-market Milwaukee.
But there are whispers Bogut wouldn’t mind a change of scenery, having become frustrated about the team’s lack of progress and his strained relationship with Bucks head coach Scott Skiles.
Unlike his teammate Stephen Jackson, who hasn’t hidden his displeasure with Skiles — Jackson recently told Rod Burks of Channel 4 in Milwaukee that “We don’t have no relationship like I’ve had with other coaches and I don’t expect to have one.” — Bogut has had his issues with Skiles as well.
Some Bucks claim the Bogut-Skiles relationship was especially acrimonious last season when they seldom communicated with each other.
Besides his noticeable talents as a rebounder and shot-blocker, Bogut also has a favorable contract. After this season, he has two years remaining: $13.1 million for the 2012-13 season and $14.2 million for the 2013-14 season.
Bogut is also just 27 and theoretically entering the prime of his career, As such, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that a slew of teams are either privately discussing acquiring Bogut or have already contacted the Bucks about him.
That includes teams are currently in the lottery like Charlotte, Golden State, Washington, New Orleans and Houston, among others, along with some teams currently in the playoffs, like Atlanta, Boston and Orlando, among others.
The latter team could come into play if the Magic decide to trade All-Star center Dwight Howard. It’s no secret the Los Angeles Lakers would love to take Howard off the Magic’s hands, although some league officials contend the Magic would be more interested in obtaining Bogut than either Lakers center Andrew Bynum or Lakers power forward Pau Gasol.
There has also been speculation the Bucks, ideally, would like to package Jackson with Bogut in a trade. That won’t be easy, however, considering Jackson is collecting $9.2 million this season and is guaranteed $10 million next season.
LUKE23 wrote:Make it any top 10 pick and I'd ship him. If it's a mid 1st, I'll wait and the chances of his value being higher next deadline would be pretty solid. But I really like the top of this draft, but it doesn't have a ton of depth, IMO. I'm looking at the guys projected mid 1st and just not getting excited.
Newz wrote:Casual fan on the radio:
"Screw draft picks. Let's trade him to Minnesota and get Beasley!"