ImageImage

Trade Targets (postcript on yesterday-other teams)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
Bucks4Milwaukee
Pro Prospect
Posts: 890
And1: 192
Joined: Feb 15, 2013

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3741 » by Bucks4Milwaukee » Mon Feb 9, 2015 7:56 pm

Giannis Parker wrote:
Newz wrote:I am willing to admit that if someone gives him something like 4 years, $56 million and we let him go... that I think there is a chance he turns into Billups and we look super stupid for not giving him the money. I don't think the odds of that happening are very high, but Knight is a gifted player and he has made a pretty big jump this year.

If he can get the mental aspect of playing PG down, if he can stop turning the ball over at such a high rate and if he can start making the easy plays on a consistent basis then he's going to be a top 10 PG.


I like this post, and agree with the premise. I would challenge you with the turnover fact just a bit however. Would you not agree that if Giannis and Parker become efficient 16-20ppg guys along with Middleton being a 14ppg guy that the turnovers will very likely figure themselves out?

I feel that is the biggest question. I personally feel that the turnovers are being highly overrated in terms of Knights play because look at what we have in terms of play making around him. I feel that as Middleton, Giannis, and Parker develop into more efficient scorers that the turnovers will adjust themselves.

However, if you truly feel that better talent around Knight has no effect on his A/To ratio, then I can get where a lot of you are coming from and why you are worried about a potential overpay.


Over the last 5 games with Giannis playing better, Knights stats arent too bad....other than his FG%. That could improve with Parker playing at a high level as well.. 8/2.3 and 2.3 steals...not bad...
Bucks fan since day one. Go Bucks!

Newz wrote:
Bucks4Milwaukee wrote:Glad youre not in the front office. We will be contending next year if all stay healthy.


:rofl:
Istanbullus
Junior
Posts: 351
And1: 185
Joined: Jul 29, 2012

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3742 » by Istanbullus » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:01 pm

Would Knight accept a more passive role, especially after he has become the go-to guy at the end of games? I think if Knight signs a long-term deal with the Bucks he will consider himself the primary building block on the team. Do we have some good examples of players that had been 'the man' who subsequently accepted smaller roles on teams?
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3743 » by Newz » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:01 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:It seems like Billups is the go-to for people hoping Knight figures it out? Is there another example out there of a point guard (or primary ball handler if you'd rather not use that designation) that was incapable of running simple pick and rolls who all of the sudden figured it out five years into the league? Honest question. There could be fifty examples, I'm just having a hard time coming up with any.


Obviously Nash always had superior vision and PG skills to Knight... but it didn't really click for him until later in his career either. He went from being a backup, to a solid starter to maybe the best offensive PG in the history of the game.

My guess was that you aren't going to find many examples when it comes to elite or all-star level PGs. Most of the time those guys just kind of have that instinct in them from the get go. If you really went back and examined tape on some lesser players though I bet it has happened more often than just a couple of times.

Like I said, I wouldn't want to bank on Knight turning into a star. I don't want to pay him like he's a franchise cornerstone. But if we could pay him somewhere between star player money and good bench player money... then I wouldn't mind keeping him around. Like I said earlier I think the ideal is when we run isolation plays we are giving the ball to Jabari or Giannis most of the time anyways.

I will say that I think Giannis has great potential as a roll/pop guy in pick situations though. Would be a shame if Knight never developed and we wasted that part of Giannis' game without having a guard who can really make the most out of it... though at the same time Knight would be an excellent sixth man and we could potentially just find a solid guard via the draft or free agency to run the offense.
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3744 » by Chuck Diesel » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:03 pm

I'd to Ersan, JOB & the Clippers 1st to Indy for David West.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3745 » by Newz » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:04 pm

Istanbullus wrote:The ideal, in my opinion, is that Giannis and Jabari are so good they are initiating most of the isolation sets for the team. Knight and Middleton would primarily be spacers and then when Giannis and/or Jabari is out of the game Knight can step up and score the ball more.

Would Knight accept a more passive role, especially after he has become the go-to guy at the end of games? I think if Knight signs a long-term deal with the Bucks he will consider himself the primary building block on the team. Do we have some good examples of players that had been 'the man' who subsequently accepted smaller roles on teams?


Is it really a bad thing if Knight is shooting at the end of the game though? As long as they are smart shots I have no problem with it. Yeah, if he tries to isolate every play at the end of the game then it's going to be an issue... but I'd think you have to rely on your coaching staff to tell him to knock that off.

If Kidd can't stop him from dribbling around one-on-one for fifteen seconds at the end of the game or if Kidd isn't drawing up plays for Giannis/Jabari (when/if they develop into legit late game options) then Kidd is basically useless.
User avatar
SkilesTheLimit
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,780
And1: 1,795
Joined: Oct 23, 2010
Location: Pop Up Zone
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3746 » by SkilesTheLimit » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:15 pm

What makes anyone think that Knight will eventually see fit to relinquish the big time shot and serve as 3rd banana to Giannis and Parker?

His contract will justify being a first option, but his play relative to the other two guys, will not.

He's going to be a poor man's Westbrook where he will see fit to shoot anywhere, anytime....and it will come at the expense of our true franchise players.
We're going to turn this team around 360 degrees.
- Jason Kidd
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,807
And1: 8,976
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3747 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:16 pm

Newz wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:It seems like Billups is the go-to for people hoping Knight figures it out? Is there another example out there of a point guard (or primary ball handler if you'd rather not use that designation) that was incapable of running simple pick and rolls who all of the sudden figured it out five years into the league? Honest question. There could be fifty examples, I'm just having a hard time coming up with any.


Obviously Nash always had superior vision and PG skills to Knight... but it didn't really click for him until later in his career either. He went from being a backup, to a solid starter to maybe the best offensive PG in the history of the game.

My guess was that you aren't going to find many examples when it comes to elite or all-star level PGs. Most of the time those guys just kind of have that instinct in them from the get go. If you really went back and examined tape on some lesser players though I bet it has happened more often than just a couple of times.

Like I said, I wouldn't want to bank on Knight turning into a star. I don't want to pay him like he's a franchise cornerstone. But if we could pay him somewhere between star player money and good bench player money... then I wouldn't mind keeping him around. Like I said earlier I think the ideal is when we run isolation plays we are giving the ball to Jabari or Giannis most of the time anyways.

I will say that I think Giannis has great potential as a roll/pop guy in pick situations though. Would be a shame if Knight never developed and we wasted that part of Giannis' game without having a guard who can really make the most out of it... though at the same time Knight would be an excellent sixth man and we could potentially just find a solid guard via the draft or free agency to run the offense.


maybe youll find this interesting since this article was just posted last week on espn insider

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/ ... loping-pgs

NBA's late-developing PG trend

Conley, Lowry latest examples of teams needing to be patient with their PGs

Originally Published: January 29, 2015
By Kevin Pelton | ESPN Insider


After a slow start to his NBA career, Mike Conley has flourished at point guard for the Grizzlies.

Odds are Mike Conley of the Memphis Grizzlies won't be named an All-Star when reserves are announced Thursday on TNT's pregame show before a doubleheader that includes Conley's Grizzlies facing the Denver Nuggets. Still, the fact that Conley is a serious part of the conversation is remarkable given that as recently as four years ago, he was one of the league's weaker starting point guards.

Conley isn't the only late-developing point guard to start his career in Memphis. During his first season and a half, Conley was backed up by Kyle Lowry, who is now with the Toronto Raptors and will be making his first All-Star appearance at age 28. When Conley and Lowry played together, there was little indication either eventually would be among the NBA's top-10 point guards, let alone both of them. They're the two most obvious examples that point guards often take more time to fully form than players at other positions.

Slow, steady development

As Jonathan Abrams shared in last week's detailed Conley feature on Grantland, the Grizzlies traded Lowry to the Houston Rockets in large part to give the younger Conley an opportunity to play point guard full time. Back then, in 2009, there were doubts about the futures of both players. Lowry was a dogged defender who had yet to consistently shoot 3s or show the ability to run a team, while Conley took a back seat on offense to teammates Rudy Gay and O.J. Mayo.

Lowry's breakthrough came in 2010-11, when he stepped into the Rockets' starting lineup in place of the injured Aaron Brooks and played well enough that Houston eventually traded Brooks. Lowry averaged 13.5 points and 6.7 assists in his first opportunity as a full-time starter. Yet Lowry was still seen more as a stopgap solution than a star when the Rockets traded him to the Raptors in summer 2012 in exchange for a first-round pick (which they later used as part of the package for James Harden). He battled Jose Calderon for minutes at the point during his first half-season in Toronto, winning the job by default when the Raptors dealt Calderon as part of a trade for his old teammate Gay.

Last season, Lowry's eighth in the NBA, was his first as a starter from beginning to end and the time he established himself as an elite point guard. Despite averaging 17.9 points and 7.4 assists per game and ranking among the league's top-10 players in win shares and wins above replacement player (WARP), Lowry was left off the All-Star team. A late push from Raptors fans to make Lowry a starter guaranteed he won't meet the same fate this year.

As the No. 4 overall pick in the 2007 draft, opportunity was never the issue for Conley: performance was. He took a step backward the season after Lowry was traded, and posted just 6.2 WARP in his first three campaigns. Yet Memphis saw enough potential to sign Conley to a widely criticized five-year, $40 million extension that has since proved one of the NBA's better bargains.

Conley made incremental progress in 2010-11, when the Grizzlies reached the playoffs and upset the top-seeded San Antonio Spurs in the opening round, and continued adding to his game as Memphis developed into one of the West's top teams. He has improved his scoring average in six of the seven seasons since his rookie campaign while growing more efficient as a scorer, culminating in 17.4 points a game in 2014-15.

When the year-by-year progress made by Conley and Lowry (measured by Win%, the per-minute version of WARP akin to PER) is put on the same chart by age, their paths look remarkably similar aside from Lowry's fluky rookie season (he played just 172 minutes before a broken wrist ended his season):

Late bloomers common among PGs

Conley and Lowry aren't unique among point guards in needing more time to reach their potential. Of the 39 players to enter the league since 2004-05 who have posted at least 10 WARP in a season (typically around the cutoff for All-Stars), 14 did so for the first time at age 25 or later. Six of those 14 late bloomers are point guards, including Conley and Lowry.

At age 28 by the conclusion of his first 10-WARP season (2013-14), Lowry is the second-oldest of the group, trailing only a former Grizzlies teammate: center Marc Gasol. The third-oldest player to break through with an All-Star performance is yet another point guard, Goran Dragic of the Phoenix Suns, with his 2013-14 season. Because Conley entered the league at age 20 and actually reached 10-plus WARP in 2012-13, his sixth season, he's not at the top of the list by age. But only Lowry (eighth season) and Andrew Bynum (seventh after entering the NBA out of high school) have taken more time to reach the 10-WARP level since entering the league in the past decade.

We should be able to add another point guard to the list this sesaon: Jeff Teague of the Atlanta Hawks, age 26 and in his sixth season, who likely will be chosen for his first All-Star Game and is on pace for 11.9 WARP.

There's an important lesson here for teams: Don't write off developing point guards too soon. Though some elite athletes are able to come into the league and dominate right away (Derrick Rose, John Wall and Russell Westbrook all reached 10 WARP before age 24), many players take longer to learn the NBA's most demanding position. Memphis benefited from betting on Conley, while for better or worse the Rockets lost out on Dragic and Lowry, both of whom were on their roster at the same time. Teams with young point guards should heed their example.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,841
And1: 30,106
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3748 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:20 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:I wouldn't be moving the Clippers pick. One of Paul/Griffin is a good bet to go down for an extended period two years from now, IMO.


But it's lotto protected until it becomes 2nd rounders, like PP said. We don't want to see LAC implode.


That's the problem. I don't think any of us focused on the protection on that Clips pick. We can't predict how tough the West will be in 24-months, but I think that if the Clips lost either Blake or CP3 from that roster for 50-games, they drop to a 40-win team and we don't get the pick.

This of course assumes that Ballmer doesn't do some magical makeover and figure out how to sign Marc Gasol as FA or something like that.

Further, as we saw with Golden State three years ago, when they purposely tanked to keep their lotto pick, if the Clips fade bad next year, you could see a scenario where they trade Paul and then tank to keep their picks, including the 2017.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3749 » by Newz » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:21 pm

GoS,

RS was asking a very specific question about PGs struggling with the PnR. I don't really Conley ever really having an issue with actually just running the point and distributing. I cannot recall Lowry having those issues either... but maybe they did. Lowry is definitely a guy who I think was underrated and finally started to get the credit he deserved recently. Lowry was even pretty damn good in Houston.
Newz
Banned User
Posts: 42,327
And1: 2,551
Joined: Dec 05, 2005

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3750 » by Newz » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:23 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:What makes anyone think that Knight will eventually see fit to relinquish the big time shot and serve as 3rd banana to Giannis and Parker?

His contract will justify being a first option, but his play relative to the other two guys, will not.

He's going to be a poor man's Westbrook where he will see fit to shoot anywhere, anytime....and it will come at the expense of our true franchise players.


1. If Giannis and Jabari truly turn into franchise players and Kidd lets Knight dominate the ball without consequence... then Kidd is terrible.
2. If Giannis and Jabari actually let that happen, then neither of them are that good in the first place.

I think you guys are way too worried about the "Knight is never going to pass the ball and doesn't want our young players to be bigger stars than him!" angle.
User avatar
MilHammer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,432
And1: 713
Joined: Oct 30, 2014
       

Re: Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3751 » by MilHammer » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:28 pm

Istanbullus wrote:Would Knight accept a more passive role, especially after he has become the go-to guy at the end of games? I think if Knight signs a long-term deal with the Bucks he will consider himself the primary building block on the team. Do we have some good examples of players that had been 'the man' who subsequently accepted smaller roles on teams?


Knight def pads his stats and tries to get his, but it seems like Kidd/management are high on him, character wise. If he truly is a high character guy and really wants to win, then I think he will accept a smaller role. I don't even know how much more diminished itd be. Obviously a lot more than now, but ideally the starting 5 would be something like the Spurs/Hawks model, and Knight would still be an integral part of the rotation.

Also, are you Turkish? Currently studying abroad in Istanbul. I live in Ortaköy.
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,807
And1: 8,976
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3752 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:30 pm

Newz wrote:GoS,

RS was asking a very specific question about PGs struggling with the PnR. I don't really Conley ever really having an issue with actually just running the point and distributing. I cannot recall Lowry having those issues either... but maybe they did. Lowry is definitely a guy who I think was underrated and finally started to get the credit he deserved recently. Lowry was even pretty damn good in Houston.


totally get that. I saw that's where he was going with it. I just saw the discussion on developing pgs and thought you all might enjoy the article for its own merit. based on allstar warp level players.... pgs are the slowest developing of any of the positions. that might add some positive vibe whether it means hes our longterm pnr guy not withstanding.
GHOSTofSIKMA
RealGM
Posts: 22,807
And1: 8,976
Joined: Jan 21, 2007
Location: NC
     

Re: Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3753 » by GHOSTofSIKMA » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:32 pm

MilHammer wrote:
Istanbullus wrote:Would Knight accept a more passive role, especially after he has become the go-to guy at the end of games? I think if Knight signs a long-term deal with the Bucks he will consider himself the primary building block on the team. Do we have some good examples of players that had been 'the man' who subsequently accepted smaller roles on teams?


Knight def pads his stats and tries to get his, but it seems like Kidd/management are high on him, character wise. If he truly is a high character guy and really wants to win, then I think he will accept a smaller role. I don't even know how much more diminished itd be. Obviously a lot more than now, but ideally the starting 5 would be something like the Spurs/Hawks model, and Knight would still be an integral part of the rotation.

Also, are you Turkish? Currently studying abroad in Istanbul. I live in Ortaköy.


knights greatest attributes are his 40% 3 pt shooting and overall efficiency as a volume scorer. there is no way to "pad" those numbers.
User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 8,101
And1: 970
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3754 » by mlloyd10 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:36 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:I'd to Ersan, JOB & the Clippers 1st to Indy for David West.


If INDY would do that - Home run trade for us
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,142
And1: 30,159
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3755 » by Ron Swanson » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:40 pm

I can understand debating the realistic possibility of a Knight for the Kings 2015 1st trade (unlikely the Kings go for it), but saying it's an awful trade because Brandon Knight is somehow a guaranteed better asset than the #7 pick is presumptuous at best.

#7 also gives you a more than realistic shot (4.3%) at #1 overall, as well as a 15% shot at a top 3 pick. Everyone poo-pooing the idea because it's "unlikely" we get a better player than Knight with that pick is something I couldn't disagree with more. Stephen Curry says hi...
randy84
RealGM
Posts: 25,373
And1: 7,330
Joined: Jul 01, 2006

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3756 » by randy84 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:43 pm

I will be happy with Knight if he get his turnovers to about 2.3 per game.
Istanbullus
Junior
Posts: 351
And1: 185
Joined: Jul 29, 2012

Re: Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3757 » by Istanbullus » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:44 pm

MilHammer wrote:
Istanbullus wrote:Would Knight accept a more passive role, especially after he has become the go-to guy at the end of games? I think if Knight signs a long-term deal with the Bucks he will consider himself the primary building block on the team. Do we have some good examples of players that had been 'the man' who subsequently accepted smaller roles on teams?


Knight def pads his stats and tries to get his, but it seems like Kidd/management are high on him, character wise. If he truly is a high character guy and really wants to win, then I think he will accept a smaller role. I don't even know how much more diminished itd be. Obviously a lot more than now, but ideally the starting 5 would be something like the Spurs/Hawks model, and Knight would still be an integral part of the rotation.

Also, are you Turkish? Currently studying abroad in Istanbul. I live in Ortaköy.


Not Turkish but have lived here for 12 years and am married to a Turk. Ortakoy? Damn, I live and teach in Arnavutkoy, 15m on foot to the north. We'll have to get together sometime and have some Cengelkoy spinach borek or some golden Efes in Besiktas at a fish meyhane.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,358
And1: 28,015
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3758 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:44 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:I'd to Ersan, JOB & the Clippers 1st to Indy for David West.


Why are we giving up a 1st for a 34 year old?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,587
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3759 » by Chuck Diesel » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:53 pm

trwi7 wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:I'd to Ersan, JOB & the Clippers 1st to Indy for David West.


Why are we giving up a 1st for a 34 year old?


Because he gives us a better shot at winning a playoff series & the pick isn't guaranteed. Also expires after the 15/16 season. West has a lot of game left.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,358
And1: 28,015
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Trade Targets 

Post#3760 » by trwi7 » Mon Feb 9, 2015 8:55 pm

Chuck Diesel wrote:
trwi7 wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:I'd to Ersan, JOB & the Clippers 1st to Indy for David West.


Why are we giving up a 1st for a 34 year old?


Because he gives us a better shot at winning a playoff series & the pick isn't guaranteed. Also expires after the 15/16 season. West has a lot of game left.


If we're trading that pick, and I understand that it's lotto protected for 3 years, I would want something better than a 34 year old PF.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks


cron