ImageImage

Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks (NO TPE)

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,088
And1: 41,577
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#481 » by emunney » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:40 am

xTitan wrote:Just flipped on NBA channel, they believe Brogdon was let go to avoid the luxury tax and the Bucks have simply blown it......always believed last year was their window, hope Giannis doesn’t realize that.


Maybe I'm in denial but I don't think the tax was a major factor in this. Wouldn't be surprised if we end up paying it yet. Given we got all these picks, I think we would have matched this if Indiana didn't throw all these picks at us AND Brogdon didn't express a desire to leave. Maybe they told him they were going to put the ball in his hands... The price tag suggests it.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
CJTURT
Analyst
Posts: 3,110
And1: 1,091
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Location: Decatur GA

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#482 » by CJTURT » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:41 am

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Order of operations is important. First things that have to happen, are using cap space to sign Lopez or Hill, then shedding about $6 mil of salary (via Leuer stretch or Ersan dump/stretch), and using cap space to sign whichever of Lopez or Hill hasn't been signed. Then, we can, in any order, use the room mid level exception, sign Middleton, S&T Brogdon. That process DOES create a TPE.


The order looks good until you spend 30 million a year on a fringe all star player. It’s not so much the order of operation, but the operation itself. They failed in my humble opinion.
awd4cy
Analyst
Posts: 3,315
And1: 1,882
Joined: Nov 23, 2013
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#483 » by awd4cy » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:41 am

It’s hilarious to me the amount of people downplaying losing Brogdon without replacing him with anything. Do you really tell yourself we can win a championship with Pat C or Sterling Brown starting?
User avatar
crkone
RealGM
Posts: 29,202
And1: 9,787
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#484 » by crkone » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:42 am

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Order of operations is important. First things that have to happen, are using cap space to sign Lopez or Hill, then shedding about $6 mil of salary (via Leuer stretch or Ersan dump/stretch), and using cap space to sign whichever of Lopez or Hill hasn't been signed. Then, we can, in any order, use the room mid level exception, sign Middleton, S&T Brogdon. That process DOES create a TPE.
GAD bomb

Code: Select all

o- - -  \o          __|
   o/   /|          vv`\
  /|     |              |
   |    / \_            |
  / \   |               |
 /  |                   |
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,068
And1: 4,192
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#485 » by DanoMac » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:43 am

Maybe there's a reason he's gone? Maybe the team, the leaders, felt the team played better when Brogdon was out (the Boston series).

There were so many times Brogdon played with horse blinders too (stealing that from breakchains). Guy's vision is really limited.

Just trying to be a voice of reason here. Maybe Brogdon wasn't all that in the locker room?
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#486 » by xTitan » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:45 am

awd4cy wrote:It’s hilarious to me the amount of people downplaying losing Brogdon without replacing him with anything. Do you really tell yourself we can win a championship with Pat C or Sterling Brown starting?

They lostBrogdon and Mirotic, I know he struggled in the playoffs, but you are an average 3 point shooting team and just lost 2 of your best 3 point shooters.....who’s picking up that slack, Bledsoe?
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,665
And1: 3,245
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#487 » by Licensed to Il » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:46 am

awd4cy wrote:It’s hilarious to me the amount of people downplaying losing Brogdon without replacing him with anything. Do you really tell yourself we can win a championship with Pat C or Sterling Brown starting?


Its hilarious to me you think this is the opening night or playoff roster.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#488 » by Bernman » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:46 am

zmanishere11 wrote:So far the offseason has proven two things:

1. Our billionaire owners aren't willing to pay the luxury tax. Even as they make billions of dollars off Giannis.

2. Confidence in our last two 1's (Donte and DJ).

I think it's possible these two can step in and produce next year. But if they don't, we take a step back as a regular season team. Playoff Bucks - who knows. Hit your free throws and some 3's and we're champions.


It doesn't prove any of that, since Mirotic turned down big money from other teams to go to Europe while being a luxury player for the Bucks, and as Dan pointed out we still have the TPE, picks, and a room exception. I think they ultimately pay the tax given how close the team was and they said that would be criteria in forking up the dough.

Doesn't mean they'll use it on a proper replacement for Brogdon given they let him go and that doesn't seem like the best decision by itself given as aforementioned they were contenders. Could wind up with an Anthony Mason type mistake after doing too much because another meddlesome owner like Kohl in Lasry took over team operations this offseason.
User avatar
buckboy
RealGM
Posts: 13,175
And1: 8,556
Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: At the Gettin' Place
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#489 » by buckboy » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:47 am

RiotPunch wrote:
Matches Malone wrote:
Read on Twitter

So yeah, I reserved my judgement and now I hate this deal. **** our cheap **** owners.


Yep. Same.

Edit: Just saw Dan's post. I definitely believe him over pretty much anyone, so I'm back to being hopeful.
"This is my home, this is my city...I'm blessed to be a part of the Milwaukee Bucks for the next 5 years. Let's make these years count. The show goes on, let's get it."
CJTURT
Analyst
Posts: 3,110
And1: 1,091
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Location: Decatur GA

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#490 » by CJTURT » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:48 am

DanoMac wrote:Maybe there's a reason he's gone? Maybe the team, the leaders, felt the team played better when Brogdon was out (the Boston series).

There were so many times Brogdon played with horse blinders too (stealing that from breakchains). Guy's vision is really limited.

Just trying to be a voice of reason here. Maybe Brogdon wasn't all that in the locker room?


Maybe Dano, it just seems like such a slap in the mouth to a lot of us. And it stings.
msiris
RealGM
Posts: 11,015
And1: 2,270
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Central Wisconsin

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#491 » by msiris » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:49 am

xTitan wrote:
awd4cy wrote:It’s hilarious to me the amount of people downplaying losing Brogdon without replacing him with anything. Do you really tell yourself we can win a championship with Pat C or Sterling Brown starting?

They lostBrogdon and Mirotic, I know he struggled in the playoffs, but you are an average 3 point shooting team and just lost 2 of your best 3 point shooters.....who’s picking up that slack, Bledsoe?
Surround Giannis with shooters. When is that going to happen?
Ride the tank
User avatar
DanoMac
RealGM
Posts: 10,068
And1: 4,192
Joined: Feb 20, 2005
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#492 » by DanoMac » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:50 am

CJTURT wrote:
DanoMac wrote:Maybe there's a reason he's gone? Maybe the team, the leaders, felt the team played better when Brogdon was out (the Boston series).

There were so many times Brogdon played with horse blinders too (stealing that from breakchains). Guy's vision is really limited.

Just trying to be a voice of reason here. Maybe Brogdon wasn't all that in the locker room?


Maybe Dano, it just seems like such a slap in the mouth to a lot of us. And it stings.


For sure, but so did the way we lost Parker. Not saying the situations are similar, just saying let's try and trust these guys (Bud and Horst) before damning them to hell
User avatar
RiotPunch
RealGM
Posts: 27,865
And1: 18,237
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: LA
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#493 » by RiotPunch » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:50 am

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Order of operations is important. First things that have to happen, are using cap space to sign Lopez or Hill, then shedding about $6 mil of salary (via Leuer stretch or Ersan dump/stretch), and using cap space to sign whichever of Lopez or Hill hasn't been signed. Then, we can, in any order, use the room mid level exception, sign Middleton, S&T Brogdon. That process DOES create a TPE.

Hill and Lopez salaries would need to be slightly lighter on year one than the projections are for this to be done under the cap, but it's possible, even while retaining Brogdon's hold (after stretching Leuer). Then, you're saying, then we could conceivably, on the 6th:

Sign Player X to Room MLE, taking us over the cap,
Re-sign Midds,
S&T Brogdon to Indiana, creating TPE
*retain TPE for future opportunities*?

Could we squeeze in a TPE for Joe Harris swap before Durant is inked?
#FreeChuckDiesel
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,088
And1: 41,577
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#494 » by emunney » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:52 am

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Order of operations is important. First things that have to happen, are using cap space to sign Lopez or Hill, then shedding about $6 mil of salary (via Leuer stretch or Ersan dump/stretch), and using cap space to sign whichever of Lopez or Hill hasn't been signed. Then, we can, in any order, use the room mid level exception, sign Middleton, S&T Brogdon. That process DOES create a TPE.


Was hoping you'd stop by. Saw Bobby Marks call it a 12m TPE. Why so small? BYC?
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,665
And1: 3,245
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#495 » by Licensed to Il » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:52 am

I have been on the couch Real GM’ing since 4:00. I love all of you.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,088
And1: 41,577
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#496 » by emunney » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:55 am

msiris wrote:
xTitan wrote:
awd4cy wrote:It’s hilarious to me the amount of people downplaying losing Brogdon without replacing him with anything. Do you really tell yourself we can win a championship with Pat C or Sterling Brown starting?

They lostBrogdon and Mirotic, I know he struggled in the playoffs, but you are an average 3 point shooting team and just lost 2 of your best 3 point shooters.....who’s picking up that slack, Bledsoe?
Surround Giannis with shooters. When is that going to happen?


We sure did it last year. But Brogdon, Snell, and Niko out... Nobody in. Offseason's young but this is easily my biggest concern: that they've discounted what got us here because we missed too many shots against Toronto.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
tydett
General Manager
Posts: 8,645
And1: 8,059
Joined: Feb 15, 2012
   

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#497 » by tydett » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:55 am

Brogdon is a good player, who can sometimes play great. He's incredibly sharp, mature, and is a good guy. Feet for some basketball players are ticking time bombs. Obviously different builds and playstyles, but Yao Ming's foot injuries destroyed his career. It's entirely possible the same happens to Brogdon. I can understand hesitance to pay for it. It sucks because Brogdon seemed to fit in really well here and did his job with aplomb, probably much better than he'll do it in Indy. It's a bummer, but I don't think this move turns out to be as disastrous as we think right now.
GBPackers47
Starter
Posts: 2,166
And1: 1,294
Joined: Jun 23, 2016
     

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#498 » by GBPackers47 » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:56 am

trwi7 wrote:
GBPackers47 wrote:Owners kept this team in Milwaukee. F*** em! Booo hoooo hoooo


You must love Bud Selig.


Yea dude. Have a shrine.

Miss.
CJTURT
Analyst
Posts: 3,110
And1: 1,091
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Location: Decatur GA

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#499 » by CJTURT » Mon Jul 1, 2019 2:57 am

DanoMac wrote:
CJTURT wrote:
DanoMac wrote:Maybe there's a reason he's gone? Maybe the team, the leaders, felt the team played better when Brogdon was out (the Boston series).

There were so many times Brogdon played with horse blinders too (stealing that from breakchains). Guy's vision is really limited.

Just trying to be a voice of reason here. Maybe Brogdon wasn't all that in the locker room?


Maybe Dano, it just seems like such a slap in the mouth to a lot of us. And it stings.


For sure, but so did the way we lost Parker. Not saying the situations are similar, just saying let's try and trust these guys (Bud and Horst) before damning them to hell


Ok, I’ll let it ride. Hope others will to. But... :lol: , if this comes back to haunt us Just remember this day.
vegaspacker
Analyst
Posts: 3,601
And1: 1,005
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
   

Re: Woj: Malcolm Brogdon S&T to Pacers for Picks 

Post#500 » by vegaspacker » Mon Jul 1, 2019 3:01 am

My take, at least some of us won't have see 'Brogdan' post for much longer.

I really have had concerns about his availability regarding recurring injury issues.

He was rather frustrating to watch at times. Sure he hit some really timely threes, but as he broke down he kinda resembled Brandon Knight with his 'all me missed' drives. Smart guy, very capable at times but occassionally a liability. Plus, his defense wasn't a plus against some true PGs or allstar SGs. Rarely did we see him passing into dominating offensive plays. But he did provide some very clutch momentum changing scores.

Dude was stoic/aloof like Kawhi, but stoicism only works when your Leonard. That's a lot of cash for a guy who cannot stay on the floor, and be a 20mil cat.

Let it be known that I have not seen a Midds contract at this posting. If he gets a max/near max... that is certainly off putting.
I needs shades for this future thing we owning..... 8-) 8-) 8-)

Return to Milwaukee Bucks