
Some of these proposals would cause NBA 2k to crash.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
 
                                                                                                          
 
                    
                    
                                                                       
                    
                    
                                                        
               Gant wrote:Add the Clippers to the teams reported to be interested in acquiring Jrue Holiday. If the Bucks want him back, that makes four credible destinations so far, with no doubt more to follow.
https://www.masslive.com/celtics/2025/05/familiar-suitor-expected-to-show-interest-in-jrue-holiday-trade-with-celtics.html
https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/nba/boston-celtics/jrue-holiday-trade-mavericks-rumors/711435/#:~:text=As%20longtime%20NBA%20reporter%20Marc,still%20left%20on%20Holiday%27s%20contract.
https://sactownsports.com/55408/sacramento-kings-jrue-holiday-trade-report/
 
                    
                    
                                                        
                
                    
                    
                                                        
               mlloyd10 wrote:Gant wrote:Add the Clippers to the teams reported to be interested in acquiring Jrue Holiday. If the Bucks want him back, that makes four credible destinations so far, with no doubt more to follow.
https://www.masslive.com/celtics/2025/05/familiar-suitor-expected-to-show-interest-in-jrue-holiday-trade-with-celtics.html
https://www.nbcsportsboston.com/nba/boston-celtics/jrue-holiday-trade-mavericks-rumors/711435/#:~:text=As%20longtime%20NBA%20reporter%20Marc,still%20left%20on%20Holiday%27s%20contract.
https://sactownsports.com/55408/sacramento-kings-jrue-holiday-trade-report/
Cause all of them can get an asset back with Jrue or get rid of someone they dont want. How hard is that to understand?
Like the Clippers would probably trade Bogdan and Jones for Holiday/28
or Kings trade Monk/Val for Holiday/28
BigO wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:JonHeist wrote:
A) we'd be SO f*ucked right now if we were in the 2nd apron and still had khris and a hurt dame
B) it's a swap of a swap, 95% chance it never conveys at all, and it it does it'll probably be like switching the 16th pick for the 18th or smth like that
We might be still playing if we had Khris instead of Kuzma.
Correction: We might still be playing if we had Kuzma and he never got off the bench.
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               MickeyDavis wrote:We've reduced ourselves to debating Jevon **** Carter. It's going to be a long offseason. It already has been.
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               Ryan5UW wrote:MickeyDavis wrote:We've reduced ourselves to debating Jevon **** Carter. It's going to be a long offseason. It already has been.
I’m just happy George Hill and Wes Matthews are finally being left in peace.
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               Ron Swanson wrote:We can lament that Bobby and Brook are no longer ideal modern big-men to have in your playoff rotation, but again, if you're just letting them walk in free agency, then I will absolutely question how serious you are about winning basketball games (and so should Giannis). You don't have to like it, but they're still quality, durable starters for an 82-game season. Needs to be less worrying about the "playoff rotation" in a year where we won't be competing for a championship anyways.
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               ShootingtheJ wrote:BigO wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
We might be still playing if we had Khris instead of Kuzma.
Correction: We might still be playing if we had Kuzma and he never got off the bench.
Maybe, but more likely, to win the series we needed 1 more contributor
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               Ron Swanson wrote:Jericho Sims will be 27 years old in October. This idea that any of these dudes on the roster outside of maybe Tyler Smith have any sort of untapped potential/development worth exploring is an even tougher sell than the "gap year" pitch. I don't see any sort of logic in rolling into next year with an absolutely barren front court rotation. Why? So Giannis can get beat to **** having to anchor the defense/rebounding in addition to his (likely) career high offensive usage?
 
                    
                    
                                                        
               Ron Swanson wrote:Jericho Sims will be 27 years old in October. This idea that any of these dudes on the roster outside of maybe Tyler Smith have any sort of untapped potential/development worth exploring is an even tougher sell than the "gap year" pitch. I don't see any sort of logic in rolling into next year with an absolutely barren front court rotation. Why? So Giannis can get beat to **** having to anchor the defense/rebounding in addition to his (likely) career high offensive usage?
 
                                      
                                                                       
                    
                    
                                                                      Ron Swanson wrote:Jericho Sims will be 27 years old in October. This idea that any of these dudes on the roster outside of maybe Tyler Smith have any sort of untapped potential/development worth exploring is an even tougher sell than the "gap year" pitch. I don't see any sort of logic in rolling into next year with an absolutely barren front court rotation. Why? So Giannis can get beat to **** having to anchor the defense/rebounding in addition to his (likely) career high offensive usage?
fansinceforever wrote:tedbrogen wrote:emunney wrote:
It's extremely easy to come up with that pitch. Here it is: we're leaning into what worked and we're going to be right there as long as you're healthy. Here's the tape of the thing that worked. Look how well it works. It's going to continue to work because the type of player we need is exactly the type of player we've never had trouble recruiting. You're going to be surrounded by hungry, fearless dudes who can shoot the living **** out of the ball. We're going to have fun, we're going to be a new kind of team, and the league is going to be jealous of us again.
And then Horst will construct a team that has this starting lineup: Sexton, Kuz, Collins, Giannis, Portis…
If this is the group and Green, Rollins, KPJ and/or GTJ are on the roster then we've actually done ok. This we can sell.
My fear is that the roster going to look much, much worse than this.
 
                                                                                                          DanoMac wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Jericho Sims will be 27 years old in October. This idea that any of these dudes on the roster outside of maybe Tyler Smith have any sort of untapped potential/development worth exploring is an even tougher sell than the "gap year" pitch. I don't see any sort of logic in rolling into next year with an absolutely barren front court rotation. Why? So Giannis can get beat to **** having to anchor the defense/rebounding in addition to his (likely) career high offensive usage?
Brook Lopez became a completely different player at 29. Not out of the question.