BigO wrote:soxperry wrote:ShootingtheJ wrote:
This is the gray area, but I don't view this as aggragating. It's Patty C for Reed and Marjon for Ellis. Banton fits in to the minimum salary exception.
I would assume it comes down to whether or not the two moves depend on each other to happen. Can the trades be made singularly and all teams are happy? If yes, then its not aggregation i would think
People need to get realistic ( I know we're on real GM).
The Bucks aren't giving up a first round pick because some of us on this board think Paul Reed has value (he doesn't) or take a chance on two players that you hope will blossom (Ellis and Blanton). You trade first round picks for proven talent, not maybes.
They're only maybes to you. These guys play, and produce. We're not giving up the 1st for Paul Reed.
Ellis and Banton don't need to blossum, they're already more measurably productive than numerous players in our rotation.















