th87 wrote:Nothing to do now. For those of you familiar with his game, who else is similar to Bogdan?
Sam Merrill
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
th87 wrote:Nothing to do now. For those of you familiar with his game, who else is similar to Bogdan?
paulpressey25 wrote:th87 wrote:
Bottom line, I hate the NBA even more after this. They don't even attempt to level the playing field.
I'm as much in the league sucks category as anyone.
However, as more comes out on this story, it sure feels like the Bucks had the deal with Bogdan at $18 million a year, did the Jrue trade, then someone later pointed out that with Jrue's $4.5 million bonus clause going against the hard cap, they could only pay Bogdan $15 million.
Doesn't missing that Jrue salary cap nuance now fit, given what happened with Pat a couple days later?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
WRau1 wrote:How did the Bucks get outbid for Schroder but got bent over a barrel for Holiday?
DukeH wrote:Plenty, RealGM Bucks Board is the Golden Dawn of forums.
trwi7 wrote:Noted basketball expert Hon Jorst.
DukeH wrote:Plenty, RealGM Bucks Board is the Golden Dawn of forums.
paulpressey25 wrote:th87 wrote:
Bottom line, I hate the NBA even more after this. They don't even attempt to level the playing field.
I'm as much in the league sucks category as anyone.
However, as more comes out on this story, it sure feels like the Bucks had the deal with Bogdan at $18 million a year, did the Jrue trade, then someone later pointed out that with Jrue's $4.5 million bonus clause going against the hard cap, they could only pay Bogdan $15 million.
Doesn't missing that Jrue salary cap nuance now fit, given what happened with Pat a couple days later?
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
paulpressey25 wrote:greekbuck34 wrote:
Giannis was talking with him for months, Bogdan wanted to play with him, the Kings wanted to S&T with us and nobody else was willing to pay him more that what we offered him.
It seemed like a simple deal to make and complete, it didn't require much to please Giannis and we somehow **** up in the end.
In hindsight, I'd rather we just did the Bogdan deal, kept Bledsoe and Hill, and figured out a different deal that wouldn't have cost as much in assets as Jrue.
RiotPunch wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:th87 wrote:
Bottom line, I hate the NBA even more after this. They don't even attempt to level the playing field.
I'm as much in the league sucks category as anyone.
However, as more comes out on this story, it sure feels like the Bucks had the deal with Bogdan at $18 million a year, did the Jrue trade, then someone later pointed out that with Jrue's $4.5 million bonus clause going against the hard cap, they could only pay Bogdan $15 million.
Doesn't missing that Jrue salary cap nuance now fit, given what happened with Pat a couple days later?
To turn the clock back even further, deciding to waive and stretch Jon Leuer cost us the difference between unacceptable and acceptable money for Bogdan after the Jrue trade.
Had we just bitten that bullet right away, or applied to the league to have it forgiven, we might have closed the deal to get them both. Leaky Lasrys probably would have brought that ship down though anyways.
Point is, the devil is in the details, and Horst has proven time and time again to not be a salary cap expert. Small markets MUST win on the margins.
WRau1 wrote:How did the Bucks get outbid for Schroder but got bent over a barrel for Holiday?
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
buckbeer wrote:I wish billionaires bought the Brewers, the Bucks owners are much more willing to spend big on payroll to win a championship, while the Brewers won't be spending much and may even be reducing their payroll for next season.
The Brewers owner Mark Attanasio should change his name to Mark Scrooge, it has been quite depressing being a Brewers fan.
coolhandluke121 wrote:RiotPunch wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:
I'm as much in the league sucks category as anyone.
However, as more comes out on this story, it sure feels like the Bucks had the deal with Bogdan at $18 million a year, did the Jrue trade, then someone later pointed out that with Jrue's $4.5 million bonus clause going against the hard cap, they could only pay Bogdan $15 million.
Doesn't missing that Jrue salary cap nuance now fit, given what happened with Pat a couple days later?
To turn the clock back even further, deciding to waive and stretch Jon Leuer cost us the difference between unacceptable and acceptable money for Bogdan after the Jrue trade.
Had we just bitten that bullet right away, or applied to the league to have it forgiven, we might have closed the deal to get them both. Leaky Lasrys probably would have brought that ship down though anyways.
Point is, the devil is in the details, and Horst has proven time and time again to not be a salary cap expert. Small markets MUST win on the margins.
I would argue that there's a much more sinister motive to these so-called mistakes and misjudgments, and that is avoiding the luxury tax while being able to make excuses that they aren't allowed to spend that much. Stretching Leuer and waiving Hill to re-sign him were done in order to go way under the cap to pay Brook, whose Bird Rights they didn't have, more than the MLE. However, there's not much evidence that they had to pay Brook that much, and it was a little too convenient that they had to pay him the exact amount that allowed them to sign-and-trade Brogdon but not to match offers (that's the difference between his QO and his cap hold). It also left them with just the room MLE and no chance of going into the tax even if they wanted to. And they had Bird Rights to everyone else, so they could have spent the full MLE and gone all the way up to the tax apron without those moves. The risk was losing Brook to a team paying him more than MLE, but his options were limited because of all the great players who were changing teams and eating up cap space.
What I'm saying is, if you accept the premise that they're really just trying to dodge the tax without being obvious about it, then you start to realize that they actually are great are managing the cap for that purpose. I'm also arguing that fitting Brook under the cap, instead of hoping to get him with the MLE, was a very costly gamble because they could have had Hill's bird rights and re-signed him much cheaper and they would have had Leuer's expiring deal as well. That's before you even consider the fact that they would have had a chance to use the MLE on someone else or match the offer for Brogdon if Brook hadn't re-signed. And technically I think they could have paid a lot of tax for just one year to match Brogdon's even after giving the Brook MLE. So it's actually kind of astounding that they did it the way they did, unless you're 100% sure Brook demanded his current deal. (I seem to recall you and Luessi and I didn't even want to give him the full MLE.)
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
xTitan wrote:midranger wrote:xTitan wrote:Your a answer is stupid, of course it reflects on the player, the fact 2 teams wanted Donte as the central figure and the Bucks valued him so highly tells you just how good he is. If Giannis gets over this and signs the extension, the Bucks sheer incompetence might actually prove to be a benefit, in this 1 particular case.
I’m surprised they didn’t insist on all the other young assets and draft picks we had left after the Jrue trade.
Or they just didn’t have to trade with the Bucks
paulpressey25 wrote:emunney wrote:
Guy must suck.
DJ is from Sacramento, Ersan lives in Mequon with the family.
Had to have been Donte and girlfriend searching for a home in Sacramento. And if we're at that point, it certainly tells you a deal was agreed on in some form quite early.
ETA: A point being hinted to on all these stories is that we promised Bogdan $18 million a year, but after the Jrue trade didn't realize we couldn't do that anymore. That angle would line up with the Pat mess.
RiotPunch wrote:paulpressey25 wrote:th87 wrote:
Bottom line, I hate the NBA even more after this. They don't even attempt to level the playing field.
I'm as much in the league sucks category as anyone.
However, as more comes out on this story, it sure feels like the Bucks had the deal with Bogdan at $18 million a year, did the Jrue trade, then someone later pointed out that with Jrue's $4.5 million bonus clause going against the hard cap, they could only pay Bogdan $15 million.
Doesn't missing that Jrue salary cap nuance now fit, given what happened with Pat a couple days later?
To turn the clock back even further, deciding to waive and stretch Jon Leuer cost us the difference between unacceptable and acceptable money for Bogdan after the Jrue trade.
Had we just bitten that bullet right away, or applied to the league to have it forgiven, we might have closed the deal to get them both. Leaky Lasrys probably would have brought that ship down though anyways.
Point is, the devil is in the details, and Horst has proven time and time again to not be a salary cap expert. Small markets MUST win on the margins.

ElPeregrino wrote:buckbeer wrote:I wish billionaires bought the Brewers, the Bucks owners are much more willing to spend big on payroll to win a championship, while the Brewers won't be spending much and may even be reducing their payroll for next season.
The Brewers owner Mark Attanasio should change his name to Mark Scrooge, it has been quite depressing being a Brewers fan.
Milwaukee's payroll regularly outranks their market size but they are handicapped by being the smallest market in a league where there is no salary cap. It doesn't matter who the owner is, they will never be able to compete with the Yankees or Dodgers in payroll.
Coach Carter wrote:This year is a wash and most of us know it.

HKPackFan wrote:I seriously come here just for the PP stalking/detective work.