#12, Brockman, Leuer, SL for #14, Dalembert

The Wet Whistle · Post #81 » by **The Wet Whistle** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 pm

Not a bad trade. only move down 2 spots. should get either Ross or one of the Jones.

europa · Post #82 » by **europa** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 pm

DrugBust wrote:It's a good deal for the win now people.

He's also an expiring and it should prevent a major blunder at 12. Good deal for all parties in my opinion, again depending on what happens with the 14th pick.

LUKE23 · Post #83 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 pm

For me, the grade on the trade depends what happens in the draft. Dalembert is a one year stop gap, nothing more.

jimmybones · Post #84 » by **jimmybones** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 pm

If we stay at 14 I'd be fine with any of: Lamb, Ross, Jones, Jones III

yoshii8 · Post #85 » by **yoshii8** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 pm

Hopefully Lamb slips to 14 w/ the shoulder and ankle concerns.

Post #86 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:38 pm

If they don't sign Ersan they're more than negating any positive this brings though.

BuckPack · Post #87 » by **BuckPack** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:39 pm

They almost traded for SD at the break, so this isn't that surprising I guess.

This should remove the Henson(finally)/Leonard/Zeller chatter tho.

europa · Post #88 » by **europa** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:39 pm

Ignore this.

Cooleyo47 · Post #89 » by **Cooleyo47** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:39 pm

Welp... Dalembert has been extremely durable over the course of his career. So, I'm sure as soon as he gets off the plane in Miltown, he'll come down w/ a bad case of Bucksitis. :-?

LUKE23 · Post #90 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:39 pm

DrugBust wrote:If they don't sign Ersan they're more than negating any positive this brings though.

Agree with that too.

SkilesTheLimit · Post #91 » by **SkilesTheLimit** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

I like this trade for a few reasons:

A) assures we won't draft one of the bust white stiffs at C
B) rids us of Brockman's worthless roster spot
C) gets us a legit C so we won't have to witness Gooden getting owned
D) we only slide down 2 spots -- we must be targeting a guy (hopefully athletic 2 or 3)

Badgerlander · Post #92 » by **Badgerlander** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

Cleared some roster spots, wonder if we'll try and add another 1st or more 2nd round picks? Also will be curious if Kwame is still in the plans to resign? Wonder if Leuer gone means we'll overpay Ersan?

EastSideBucksFan · Post #93 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

Brockman is gone?

Crazy deal. Only moving down two spots.

But we traded Leuer?

The Wet Whistle · Post #94 » by **The Wet Whistle** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

SkilesTheLimit wrote:I like this trade for a few reasons:

A) assures we won't draft one of the bust white stiffs at C
B) rids us of Brockman's worthless roster spot
C) gets us a legit C so we won't have to witness Gooden getting owned
D) we only slide down 2 spots -- we must be targeting a guy (hopefully athletic 2 or 3)

This is where I'm at as well

WRau1 · Post #95 » by **WRau1** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

He should be easily flipped at the deadline if Milwaukee is totally out of the playoff picture. We never capitalize on those types of situations so most likely not, though

crkone · Post #96 » by **crkone** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

Isn't Dalembert a team option this year?

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #97 » by **Buck You** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 pm

So does dalembert have a team option for this coming season? Am I reading that right? Was it already picked up?

Post #98 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:41 pm

LRMAM/Harris
Ersan/Udoh
Daly/Sanders

is hella good defensively.

BucksRUS · Post #99 » by **BucksRUS** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:41 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Yep, the one positive of this is it appears we will not draft a big.

Maybe. If Ross and Lamb are gone, they still could take a big like T. Jones.

europa · Post #100 » by **europa** » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:41 pm

BuckPack wrote:
This should remove the Henson(finally)/Leonard/Zeller chatter tho.

To me, that's huge. Instead of wasting a valuable pick on a career backup, the Bucks get a one-year rental and can look again at C next year when far superior players are expected to be in the draft at that position. It also means fewer minutes for Gooden at C and that's obviously huge news. Plus, the drop-off from 12 to 14 shouldn't be significant so the Bucks should still be able to get a good player there.

Only negative I see (again depending on what happens at 14) is losing Leuer. I think he can be a fine rotation PF in this league given his offensive ability. But it was obvious Skiles never trusted him and had no real interest in playing him.