ImageImage

Trade Rumor?? Redd, CV, 1st for TMac+Bonzi

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#81 » by fam3381 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:02 pm

MFScho wrote:Second, anybody else remember those ramblings about how McGrady wants to play baseball once his contract is over with? Maybe once he hears about a deal to Milwaukee, he'll move those plans to the forefront.


I think he's got about $55 million reasons to grin and bear it in Brewtown :)

MFScho wrote:But I like this, Redd rumors. May the highest bidder step forward.


Has MBBOT suggested Nene for Redd yet?
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,123
And1: 27,723
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#82 » by trwi7 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:04 pm

MFScho wrote:Second, anybody else remember those ramblings about how McGrady wants to play baseball once his contract is over with?


What position does he play? If it's 3rd base or pitcher the Brewers should take him. :lol:
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
worthlessBucks
RealGM
Posts: 22,566
And1: 4,932
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Bucks Logo
   

 

Post#83 » by worthlessBucks » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:06 pm

fam3381 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Has MBBOT suggested Nene for Redd yet?

I think that move hinges strictly on Ray Nixon's availability.
Go Bucks!
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 112,123
And1: 27,723
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#84 » by trwi7 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:11 pm

MFScho wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


I think that move hinges strictly on Ray Nixon's availability.


I think we may have to swing a Yi and a 1st for Luke Jackson.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,816
And1: 11,555
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#85 » by midranger » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:21 pm

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I think we may have to swing a Yi and a 1st for Luke Jackson.


Could work out. After all, we need defense. And that is who the Heat schemed to put on out elite scorer. Their game plan was clearly to shut Redd down by leaving Luke Jackson 1 on 1 with him, that should have been clear to any one with a brain watching. The double teaming of Mo Williams was simply an opportunity for the Bucks due to all the attention that Redd was attracting.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,370
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

 

Post#86 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:23 pm

Im not saying McGrady isnt better than Redd, but, one of the main complaints of Redd is he could never be the #1 guy on a contender. Ok lets say thats true, umm what about TMac? What has he done in the playoffs? And also consider he hasnt even done it with a guy who is a top 2-3 center in the NBA (depending on who you consider a center).
TMac didnt go to Orlando to be the guy, he went to be second banana to Hill. He never even wanted to be the guy. (Which coincidentally is why he left Orlando)

Whats the advantage of this trade then? And why would McGrady even want to come here where he'd have to be the guy again?
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#87 » by jerrod » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:25 pm

midranger wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Could work out. After all, we need defense. And that is who the Heat schemed to put on out elite scorer. Their game plan was clearly to shut Redd down by leaving Luke Jackson 1 on 1 with him, that should have been clear to any one with a brain watching. The double teaming of Mo Williams was simply an opportunity for the Bucks due to all the attention that Redd was attracting.



nicely done :rofl:
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

 

Post#88 » by REDDzone » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:25 pm

He never even wanted to be the guy.


I thought I read somewhere that he left Toronto because he knew he could never be the guy with Vince there?


I did read it on the Raptors board though, so who knows how accurate that was? :-?
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
duluth111222
Sophomore
Posts: 242
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 10, 2005

 

Post#89 » by duluth111222 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:27 pm

Rox fan here. It's funny you guys all say you don't like this trade, yet the thread has reached 7 pages in what 3 hours?

I'm glad you guys don't like it, cuz no way in hell would Houston agree to this trade.

Albeit injury prone, T-Mac still > Redd. Don't say I don't know anything about Bucks. I'm Chinese, so by nature I'm a Yi fan and have watched many Bucks games this season. Redd is a selfish chucker. I wouldn't want any of that on my team.

Bonzi has been playing great of late. As of now Bonzi > CV.

Adding a 1st is nice. But even an unprotected 1st is not worth the talent difference.

Rox say no.
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#90 » by fam3381 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:32 pm

duluth111222 wrote:Rox fan here. It's funny you guys all say you don't like this trade, yet the thread has reached 7 pages in what 3 hours?


That's because some people would do the trade.
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#91 » by europa » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:38 pm

fam3381 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That's because some people would do the trade.


It's interesting to me that so many of the people who want to trade Redd for crap don't want to trade him for a player who's considerably better - even with his durability issues - than nearly every single one of the players they want to bring back in a Redd trade. And that's not even taking into account the fact Bonzi Wells would instantly become the second-best wing player on this team behind McGrady.
Nothing will not break me.
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#92 » by showtimesam » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:44 pm

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It's interesting to me that so many of the people who want to trade Redd for crap don't want to trade him for a player who's considerably better - even with his durability issues - than nearly every single one of the players they want to bring back in a Redd trade. And that's not even taking into account the fact Bonzi Wells would instantly become the second-best wing player on this team behind McGrady.


I agree..
There's two ways you can go with redd... Trade him for crap (cap space and future draft picks) or a for a player thats better and offers the chance for the team to dramatically improve immediately.

This move would definitely do that, and I would love having something to get excited about THIS season. That would be great if this trade was legit, we'll have to wait and see..
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#93 » by fam3381 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:46 pm

europa wrote:It's interesting to me that so many of the people who want to trade Redd for crap don't want to trade him for a player who's considerably better - even with his durability issues - than nearly every single one of the players they want to bring back in a Redd trade.


Hey, we're holding out for Dwight Howard. Be patient.

Riles offered us Wade for Redd straight up last night, but c'mon, D-Wade's been banged up. Not worth the risk :)
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
FoDrizzle
Sophomore
Posts: 171
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 26, 2007
Location: Celtics-hating

 

Post#94 » by FoDrizzle » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:46 pm

I don't know about trading for T-Mac. The guy clearly does not give a sh*t about winning anymore, let alone that he's always injured. I think it will be a bad marriage and the Bucks should wait for a more sensible deal which hopefully doesn't involve the unprotected 1st.
03-13-2005: Donyell Marshall with 12 trays
fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

 

Post#95 » by fam3381 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:48 pm

FoDrizzle wrote:The guy clearly does not give a sh*t, and is always injured.


Huh?
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#96 » by Nowak008 » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:48 pm

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It's interesting to me that so many of the people who want to trade Redd for crap don't want to trade him for a player who's considerably better - even with his durability issues - than nearly every single one of the players they want to bring back in a Redd trade. And that's not even taking into account the fact Bonzi Wells would instantly become the second-best wing player on this team behind McGrady.


Its because they don't see that core contending, and want to rebuild with young players around Yi.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

 

Post#97 » by REDDzone » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:50 pm

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It's interesting to me that so many of the people who want to trade Redd for crap don't want to trade him for a player who's considerably better - even with his durability issues - than nearly every single one of the players they want to bring back in a Redd trade. And that's not even taking into account the fact Bonzi Wells would instantly become the second-best wing player on this team behind McGrady.


Its because of the general direction people want to see the team take. Replacing Redd with McGrady does not make us a contender now, or the future (has anyone mentioned McGrady has currently missed several games lately, and recently said he time table for return is "weeks"?)

If we want to trade Redd, I know a lot of people, including myself, want to pick up maybe an expirer for cap purposes, a young prospect, and/or a good draft pick in order to build around Bogut/YI/Mo for the future.

If we decide to keep Redd, then I think a lot of people, again including myself, want to see a team that can contend within the next few years. As in, add JO, add Gasol, etc. by means of our young assets and/or draft picks.

Replacing Redd with T-Mac at this point still shows the consistency of this team in regards to having NO direction whatsoever. Neither a contender now or soon, and certainly not bulding for the future by giving away our draft pick (likely a good one with how horrible this team has been playing).
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

 

Post#98 » by europa » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:55 pm

fam3381 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Hey, we're holding out for Dwight Howard. Be patient.

Riles offered us Wade for Redd straight up last night, but c'mon, D-Wade's been banged up. Not worth the risk :)


If only he would've done better against Redd in the first half when Redd was playing good D on him. :D

Replacing Redd with T-Mac at this point still shows the consistency of this team in regards to having NO direction whatsoever. Neither a contender now or soon, and certainly not bulding for the future by giving away our draft pick (likely a good one with how horrible this team has been playing).


I think it greatly improves the team this season. The long-term issue isn't great because the team will remain better with McGrady. The concern would be losing Wells and not having the first-round pick. But if it's lotto or Top 10 protected, that risk is gone. Plus, you remove one piece of dead weight (Villanueva) who has never fit in. So you improve your team by adding two players better than the ones you traded and even if the pick isn't lotto protected (a greater risk I realize) you do have Wells to either re-sign or use his cap room to hopefully bring in a good player.

The only concern I have about this trade is dealing the first-round pick and possibly only getting cap room in return. That doesn't sit well with me but I think the opportunity to add an elite talent is worth it.
Nothing will not break me.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,816
And1: 11,555
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#99 » by midranger » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:55 pm

europa wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



It's interesting to me that so many of the people who want to trade Redd for crap don't want to trade him for a player who's considerably better - even with his durability issues - than nearly every single one of the players they want to bring back in a Redd trade. And that's not even taking into account the fact Bonzi Wells would instantly become the second-best wing player on this team behind McGrady.


Does this move make us a playoff team? Does it help us get to the finals?

TMac and Wells have Yao (one of the best players in the league), and Battier (one of the best glue guys in the league), with an experienced head coach. Yet, they are currently 15-17, in 10th place in the Western Conference. I shudder to think where they'd be with Bogut, Simmons, and Krysto.

That said, I still do it if the pick is removed, as stated, because TMac's deal is a year shorter than Redd and he's a name guy for marketing reasons.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#100 » by Buck You » Thu Jan 3, 2008 8:58 pm

Tmac would do wonders for Yi and Bogut with his play making abilities. But he's never healthy so I don't know about this trade.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks