Epicurus wrote:Twas fun participating in a forum here again. I will miss it again.
It, Stotts as member of Bucks' coaching staff, was not a good fit. TS tried to make it work, but it wasn't working. The Bucks will be fine, so much top player talent; Stotts will be fine, assuming he can get out of his downtown Ml. lease, in his new Florida house. Indeed the only one hurting is me who will be out of this forum's joys, not getting some free Buck player gear(I have abnormally long arms and have welcomed the package of gear for each TS coaching stop),and a Milwaukee visit or two.
Ciao, Epicurus
I just want to say, that I'm legitimately dismayed this didn't work out.
While my opinion was always that Stotts was not a good fit for the head coaching position in the NBA, I always maintained that he was one of the best (probably top 5) assistant coaches in the history of the NBA, and I was absolutely thrilled when I heard he had re-joined the Bucks in that role.
I don't fault Stotts at all for this not working out. I believe his intentions were good, pure, and for what he believed were the best interests of the team. I'm a big believer in Adrian Griffin, but I do wish he would have handled this differently. I understand why he handled it like he did, and I think it's justifiable, but it was also a strategic misstep. Stotts was a very valuable asset to this team, and that should have been factored in when managing that asset.
As you said, Griffin could have subsequently talked to Stotts privately and clarified his expectations, specifically regarding the "incident" that is being focused on. This all could have been avoided and dealt with differently. I think Stotts would have easily explained why he thought that was the best thing to do at that time, and I also think Stotts would have acknowledged to Griffin that he understands why he should handle things differently. That could have been easily resolved.
Oh well.
I wish Stotts all the best.