Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
shrink
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,647
- And1: 19,743
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 20,558
- And1: 31,019
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
Absolutely zero world where I would trade Anthony Edwards for Kevin Durant, despite being willing to fully mortgage everything outside of him and Karl-Anthony Towns. Realistically, another team likely beats out the D'Angelo Russell, Jaden McDaniels, and picks package I outlined (albeit I am not positive), but that is what I would consider.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
TwolvesFanRome
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,434
- And1: 666
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
KGdaBom wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:According to me the core (Ant Kat JMcD) is untouchable...Dlo Beasley are available...in my head too!
McD is touchable.![]()
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
- Domejandro
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves

- Posts: 20,558
- And1: 31,019
- Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
shrink wrote:Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.
For what it is worth, I thought that restriction was that you can't trade for two players that are on that extension; I think one signed and one traded for is fair game, if I am not mistaken.
I honestly could be wrong, though, the rule is confusing.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,470
- And1: 5,995
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
Devilzsidewalk wrote:Thought exercise - Brooklyn doesn't like Ayton apparently, and Miami doesn't work b/c Bam can't be traded with Simmons on the roster...revisit D'Lo for Simmons? We could even include Beasley if they want to get off of Joe Harris' extra year. Then include Prince to make up the salary difference, though I think the trade works either way. You could also do Vando if you were really high on Simmons.
Now Brooklyn can roll out: D'Lo/Beasley/O'Neale/Vando/Bam/Curry/Claxton/and of course David Duke.
That's pretty solid! right? RIGHT?
Literally cannot happen. KAT extension means Simmons cannot be traded here.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,470
- And1: 5,995
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
Baseline81 wrote:Krawczynski article:
https://theathletic.com/3393151/2022/07/01/wolves-free-agency-towns/?source=user-shared-articleThey also continued their talks with Utah about Gobert, which have been on again and off again since before the draft. The Jazz are expected to drive a hard bargain for one of the best defensive players of this generation, but the Wolves remain interested in pairing him with Towns in a super-sized frontcourt. Other bigs who could be explored include Indiana’s Myles Turner and Atlanta's Clint Capela, though there has been very little traction between Minnesota and Atlanta over the last few weeks.
I am glad the Gobert talks have resumed. I guess the million dollar question is what does Utah want and what are we willing to give? It does sound like twin towers is the end game.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Devilzsidewalk
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,043
- And1: 6,061
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
Domejandro wrote:shrink wrote:Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.
For what it is worth, I thought that restriction was that you can't trade for two players that are on that extension; I think one signed and one traded for is fair game, if I am not mistaken.
I honestly could be wrong, though, the rule is confusing.
that's what i thought too

Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
SO_MONEY
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,799
- And1: 1,032
- Joined: Sep 11, 2009
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
winforlose wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Krawczynski article:
https://theathletic.com/3393151/2022/07/01/wolves-free-agency-towns/?source=user-shared-articleThey also continued their talks with Utah about Gobert, which have been on again and off again since before the draft. The Jazz are expected to drive a hard bargain for one of the best defensive players of this generation, but the Wolves remain interested in pairing him with Towns in a super-sized frontcourt. Other bigs who could be explored include Indiana’s Myles Turner and Atlanta's Clint Capela, though there has been very little traction between Minnesota and Atlanta over the last few weeks.
I am glad the Gobert talks have resumed. I guess the million dollar question is what does Utah want and what are we willing to give? It does sound like twin towers is the end game.
If I were to guess it is more like what a team like CHI wants to ship out to Utah and what we might actually want that a team like that and give assets and use space for.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
twolves31
- Junior
- Posts: 381
- And1: 256
- Joined: Jan 13, 2018
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
winforlose wrote:Devilzsidewalk wrote:Thought exercise - Brooklyn doesn't like Ayton apparently, and Miami doesn't work b/c Bam can't be traded with Simmons on the roster...revisit D'Lo for Simmons? We could even include Beasley if they want to get off of Joe Harris' extra year. Then include Prince to make up the salary difference, though I think the trade works either way. You could also do Vando if you were really high on Simmons.
Now Brooklyn can roll out: D'Lo/Beasley/O'Neale/Vando/Bam/Curry/Claxton/and of course David Duke.
That's pretty solid! right? RIGHT?
Literally cannot happen. KAT extension means Simmons cannot be traded here.
It's called the Designated Rookie rule, and in this instance, it pertains not to Durant himself, but to current teammate Ben Simmons. The Designated Rookie rule allows teams to sign players coming off of rookie contracts to a five-year extension rather than the typical four. A team can designate up to two rookies for such contracts, but there's a caveat: only one of them can be acquired by trade. Simmons, himself on a five-year deal signed with Philadelphia, already occupies one of those slots
You can have up to 2 designated rookies on a team but only one can be traded for. We didn't trade for Kat so we could still trade for a Bam or Simmons. I believe Towns should be off his designated rookie extension come time to extend Ant. Dlo didn't get the designated rookie extension either.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,643
- And1: 6,485
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
TwolvesFanRome wrote:KGdaBom wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:According to me the core (Ant Kat JMcD) is untouchable...Dlo Beasley are available...in my head too!
McD is touchable.![]()
According to me we shouldn't give him away...
Absolutely we shouldn't "give" him away. However, if we can get a young star in a deal say Jayson Tatum I would be packing McDaniels bags and driving him to the airport.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,643
- And1: 6,485
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
shrink wrote:Now that KAT signed, we can’t legally trade for a player who signed a designated veteran deal like Simmons.
I thought we could trade KAT for Simmons?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,470
- And1: 5,995
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
twolves31 wrote:winforlose wrote:Devilzsidewalk wrote:Thought exercise - Brooklyn doesn't like Ayton apparently, and Miami doesn't work b/c Bam can't be traded with Simmons on the roster...revisit D'Lo for Simmons? We could even include Beasley if they want to get off of Joe Harris' extra year. Then include Prince to make up the salary difference, though I think the trade works either way. You could also do Vando if you were really high on Simmons.
Now Brooklyn can roll out: D'Lo/Beasley/O'Neale/Vando/Bam/Curry/Claxton/and of course David Duke.
That's pretty solid! right? RIGHT?
Literally cannot happen. KAT extension means Simmons cannot be traded here.
It's called the Designated Rookie rule, and in this instance, it pertains not to Durant himself, but to current teammate Ben Simmons. The Designated Rookie rule allows teams to sign players coming off of rookie contracts to a five-year extension rather than the typical four. A team can designate up to two rookies for such contracts, but there's a caveat: only one of them can be acquired by trade. Simmons, himself on a five-year deal signed with Philadelphia, already occupies one of those slots
You can have up to 2 designated rookies on a team but only one can be traded for. We didn't trade for Kat so we could still trade for a Bam or Simmons. I believe Towns should be off his designated rookie extension come time to extend Ant. Dlo didn't get the designated rookie extension either.
Sounds plausible. Contrary to what I have been reading, but let’s assume this correct. Then the question is Dlo, Beasley, and Prince for Simmons. I am fine moving all 3 players but I wouldn’t touch Ben Simmons. I would be fine moving him to a third team if meant getting back significant value.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
TwolvesFanRome
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,434
- And1: 666
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
KGdaBom wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:KGdaBom wrote:McD is touchable.![]()
According to me we shouldn't give him away...
Absolutely we shouldn't "give" him away. However, if we can get a young star in a deal say Jayson Tatum I would be packing McDaniels bags and driving him to the airport.
But I don't see a scenario like this my friend...
And, for example, I wouldn't pack him in a trade for Gobert/Turner/Ayton...
So we need to talk about what young stars are possible
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,643
- And1: 6,485
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
winforlose wrote:Baseline81 wrote:Krawczynski article:
https://theathletic.com/3393151/2022/07/01/wolves-free-agency-towns/?source=user-shared-articleThey also continued their talks with Utah about Gobert, which have been on again and off again since before the draft. The Jazz are expected to drive a hard bargain for one of the best defensive players of this generation, but the Wolves remain interested in pairing him with Towns in a super-sized frontcourt. Other bigs who could be explored include Indiana’s Myles Turner and Atlanta's Clint Capela, though there has been very little traction between Minnesota and Atlanta over the last few weeks.
I am glad the Gobert talks have resumed. I guess the million dollar question is what does Utah want and what are we willing to give? It does sound like twin towers is the end game.
I'm thinking Kessler would be in the deal for sure. I don't know what else. Russell to match salary.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
TwolvesFanRome
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,434
- And1: 666
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
About Gobert I am all in with Dane Moore: look at Turner and not to him...
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
KGdaBom
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,643
- And1: 6,485
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
TwolvesFanRome wrote:KGdaBom wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:
According to me we shouldn't give him away...
Absolutely we shouldn't "give" him away. However, if we can get a young star in a deal say Jayson Tatum I would be packing McDaniels bags and driving him to the airport.
![]()
![]()
![]()
But I don't see a scenario like this my friend...
And, for example, I wouldn't pack him in a trade for Gobert/Turner/Ayton...
So we need to talk about what young stars are possible
I think I've proved my point though. For the right offer we should trade McDaniels.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
winforlose
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,470
- And1: 5,995
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
TwolvesFanRome wrote:About Gobert I am all in with Dane Moore: look at Turner and not to him...
When did he say this?
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
shrink wrote:For fun. Suppose Durant was willing to come to MIN. He always liked the city when he’d visit his ex-fiancée.
Asking price is ANT … (and DLo, Beasley and a 1st).
We LOVE LOVE LOVE Ant, but this is Kevin Durant, first ballot Hall of Famer. Do ya?
No way and I love Durant. Durant is past his prime. Ant will be great for years to come.
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
TwolvesFanRome
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,434
- And1: 666
- Joined: Aug 25, 2014
- Location: Roma
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
winforlose wrote:TwolvesFanRome wrote:About Gobert I am all in with Dane Moore: look at Turner and not to him...
When did he say this?
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
-
Nick K
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,784
- And1: 2,394
- Joined: Nov 23, 2016
-
Re: Trade Talk (Part Ten): 2022 Offseason Edition
shrink wrote:We definitely need to look into a consolidation trade, to de-clutter the roster, and find minutes for others.
I think the five players the Wolves would shop hardest are
DLo. .. it looks like the most likely trade destinations chose someone else.
Naz .. like him, but he’d be more useful to a different team
Beasley .. I think he provides a valuable skill, but it sounds like they seek minutes for Nowell
Prince .. he has extra value here, but getting Kyle makes him expendable. Signing Wednesday made him trade eligible
Pat Bev .. another player with extra value here
Targets: big bruiser next to Towns, or a replacement PG is DLo or PatBev are dealt.
I'm thinking the exact same thing conceptually. I have no idea what they will do but they need to do something. My guess is they move Prince and Beasley.
I'm loving the new front office.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves



