ImageImageImage

The Rob Dillingham Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,097
And1: 22,624
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#261 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 2, 2024 12:42 am

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 300
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#262 » by fattymcgee » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:00 am

KGdaBom wrote:
MN7725 wrote:
jscott wrote:Don’t know if he had a nickname yet but I’d like to submit “Thrillingham” for consideration.


I'd seen a bunch of times that his nickname is Shifty

Yep. I've heard that one. I don't like it.


I like Shifty.
User avatar
m2002brian
Analyst
Posts: 3,312
And1: 1,369
Joined: May 29, 2009
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#263 » by m2002brian » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:02 am

The Sheriff of Dillingham
BLUEGREENRED
Loaf_of_bread
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,366
And1: 643
Joined: Nov 21, 2023
     

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#264 » by Loaf_of_bread » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:21 am

Have a feeling he is garland 2.0.. Something to be desired the first year or so, and then turns into a stud. Guy definitely needs to hit the weight room hard.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,925
And1: 6,236
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#265 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:32 am

Loaf_of_bread wrote:Have a feeling he is garland 2.0.. Something to be desired the first year or so, and then turns into a stud. Guy definitely needs to hit the weight room hard.

He's actually ripped as hell. He may not be able to add any more muscle without becoming muscle bound.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#266 » by Colbinii » Tue Jul 2, 2024 4:12 am

shrink wrote:Minneapolis is the home of Dairy Queen - they need to get him on board.


Especially if he can drop a bar or two
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,674
And1: 5,180
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#267 » by minimus » Tue Jul 2, 2024 6:11 am

BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.

Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1


So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,519
And1: 6,594
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#268 » by shangrila » Tue Jul 2, 2024 8:49 am

minimus wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.

Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1


So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?

Not sure who was labelling Dillingham as an undersized shooting guard. Most people had him listed as a combo-guard at worst and a score first PG at best.

But neither Castle or McCain played as or are considered to be PGs at this time. Aside from Castle himself nobody views him as a PG and everyone knew McCain was playing a role and might be more Seth Curry than actual floor general.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,674
And1: 5,180
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#269 » by minimus » Tue Jul 2, 2024 8:52 am

shangrila wrote:
minimus wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.

Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1


So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?

Not sure who was labelling Dillingham as an undersized shooting guard. Most people had him listed as a combo-guard at worst and a score first PG at best.

But neither Castle or McCain played as or are considered to be PGs at this time. Aside from Castle himself nobody views him as a PG and everyone knew McCain was playing a role and might be more Seth Curry than actual floor general.


Yes, that was exactly my question
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,925
And1: 6,236
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#270 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:11 pm

minimus wrote:
BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.

Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1


So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?

To me he wasn't saying anything. He found the numbers interesting.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,097
And1: 22,624
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#271 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:16 pm

College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,925
And1: 6,236
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#272 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:31 pm

Klomp wrote:College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals

Wow better than Kyrie's in every way. Did metrics have Kyrie in the bottom 0.5% of defenders? :o
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,097
And1: 22,624
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#273 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:37 pm

Extended out those stats a little more

College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
De'Aaron Fox 30.4 points, 7.2 rebounds, 8.3 assists, 4.4 turnovers, 2.7 steals
Darius Garland 33.8 points, 7.9 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 6.3 turnovers, 1.7 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Malik Monk 33.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Collin Sexton 36.5 points, 7.2 rebounds, 6.9 assists, 5.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Coby White 29.6 points, 6.5 rebounds, 7.5 assists, 4.9 turnovers, 2.0 steals
Trae Young 40.4 points, 5.8 rebounds, 12.9 assists, 7.7 turnovers, 2.5 steals
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 22,925
And1: 6,236
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#274 » by KGdaBom » Tue Jul 2, 2024 3:45 pm

Klomp wrote:Extended out those stats a little more

College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
De'Aaron Fox 30.4 points, 7.2 rebounds, 8.3 assists, 4.4 turnovers, 2.7 steals
Darius Garland 33.8 points, 7.9 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 6.3 turnovers, 1.7 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Malik Monk 33.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Collin Sexton 36.5 points, 7.2 rebounds, 6.9 assists, 5.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Coby White 29.6 points, 6.5 rebounds, 7.5 assists, 4.9 turnovers, 2.0 steals
Trae Young 40.4 points, 5.8 rebounds, 12.9 assists, 7.7 turnovers, 2.5 steals

Thanks. Trae's points and assists are ridonkulous.
Slim Tubby
Veteran
Posts: 2,913
And1: 2,533
Joined: Jun 03, 2017
         

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#275 » by Slim Tubby » Tue Jul 2, 2024 4:12 pm

Colbinii wrote:
shrink wrote:Minneapolis is the home of Dairy Queen - they need to get him on board.


Especially if he can drop a bar or two
Don't dilly dally around the topic...get to the bottom of it.

Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,357
And1: 19,393
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#276 » by shrink » Tue Jul 2, 2024 4:23 pm

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,097
And1: 22,624
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#277 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 3, 2024 6:11 pm

I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.

In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter

He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,101
And1: 5,722
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#278 » by winforlose » Wed Jul 3, 2024 6:14 pm

Klomp wrote:I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.

In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter

He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.


If we had Monte it would go that deep. Without Monte, he is in by default. You don’t want to force Ant to PG whenever Mike is off the floor. NAW is not a PG and cannot really play make. So unless your gonna replace RD with whoever we get as the 3rd string, he is gonna be 15-25 minutes a night or more in the playoffs.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,097
And1: 22,624
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#279 » by Klomp » Wed Jul 3, 2024 6:21 pm

winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.

In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter

He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.


If we had Monte it would go that deep. Without Monte, he is in by default. You don’t want to force Ant to PG whenever Mike is off the floor. NAW is not a PG and cannot really play make. So unless your gonna replace RD with whoever we get as the 3rd string, he is gonna be 15-25 minutes a night or more in the playoffs.

Here I'm referring to the role as what his job is on the court, not necessarily the minutes he is playing.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,101
And1: 5,722
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread 

Post#280 » by winforlose » Wed Jul 3, 2024 6:25 pm

Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.

In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter

He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.


If we had Monte it would go that deep. Without Monte, he is in by default. You don’t want to force Ant to PG whenever Mike is off the floor. NAW is not a PG and cannot really play make. So unless your gonna replace RD with whoever we get as the 3rd string, he is gonna be 15-25 minutes a night or more in the playoffs.

Here I'm referring to the role as what his job is on the court, not necessarily the minutes he is playing.


My bad, I saw “ I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.” Then assumed you were talking about minutes.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves