The Rob Dillingham Thread
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,097
- And1: 22,625
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Senior
- Posts: 555
- And1: 300
- Joined: Apr 03, 2008
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
KGdaBom wrote:MN7725 wrote:jscott wrote:Don’t know if he had a nickname yet but I’d like to submit “Thrillingham” for consideration.
I'd seen a bunch of times that his nickname is Shifty
Yep. I've heard that one. I don't like it.
I like Shifty.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,366
- And1: 644
- Joined: Nov 21, 2023
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Have a feeling he is garland 2.0.. Something to be desired the first year or so, and then turns into a stud. Guy definitely needs to hit the weight room hard.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,935
- And1: 6,236
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Loaf_of_bread wrote:Have a feeling he is garland 2.0.. Something to be desired the first year or so, and then turns into a stud. Guy definitely needs to hit the weight room hard.
He's actually ripped as hell. He may not be able to add any more muscle without becoming muscle bound.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,243
- And1: 21,858
- Joined: Feb 13, 2013
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
shrink wrote:Minneapolis is the home of Dairy Queen - they need to get him on board.
Especially if he can drop a bar or two
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,675
- And1: 5,181
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.
Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1
So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,519
- And1: 6,594
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
minimus wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.
Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1
So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?
Not sure who was labelling Dillingham as an undersized shooting guard. Most people had him listed as a combo-guard at worst and a score first PG at best.
But neither Castle or McCain played as or are considered to be PGs at this time. Aside from Castle himself nobody views him as a PG and everyone knew McCain was playing a role and might be more Seth Curry than actual floor general.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,675
- And1: 5,181
- Joined: Jan 28, 2011
- Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
shangrila wrote:minimus wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.
Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1
So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?
Not sure who was labelling Dillingham as an undersized shooting guard. Most people had him listed as a combo-guard at worst and a score first PG at best.
But neither Castle or McCain played as or are considered to be PGs at this time. Aside from Castle himself nobody views him as a PG and everyone knew McCain was playing a role and might be more Seth Curry than actual floor general.
Yes, that was exactly my question
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,935
- And1: 6,236
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
minimus wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:Numbers I find interesting.
Dillingham: USG%: 30.3, AST%: 29.7, TO%: 13.5
Castle: USG%: 22.0, AST%: 18.4, TO%: 13.0
McCain: USG%: 21.1, AST%: 11.0, TO%: 10.1
So basically you are saying that the guy labeled as undersized shooting guard is better at playmaking then other guys labeled as point guards? Am I right?
To me he wasn't saying anything. He found the numbers interesting.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,097
- And1: 22,625
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,935
- And1: 6,236
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Klomp wrote:College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Wow better than Kyrie's in every way. Did metrics have Kyrie in the bottom 0.5% of defenders?

Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,097
- And1: 22,625
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Extended out those stats a little more
College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
De'Aaron Fox 30.4 points, 7.2 rebounds, 8.3 assists, 4.4 turnovers, 2.7 steals
Darius Garland 33.8 points, 7.9 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 6.3 turnovers, 1.7 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Malik Monk 33.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Collin Sexton 36.5 points, 7.2 rebounds, 6.9 assists, 5.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Coby White 29.6 points, 6.5 rebounds, 7.5 assists, 4.9 turnovers, 2.0 steals
Trae Young 40.4 points, 5.8 rebounds, 12.9 assists, 7.7 turnovers, 2.5 steals
College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
De'Aaron Fox 30.4 points, 7.2 rebounds, 8.3 assists, 4.4 turnovers, 2.7 steals
Darius Garland 33.8 points, 7.9 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 6.3 turnovers, 1.7 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Malik Monk 33.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Collin Sexton 36.5 points, 7.2 rebounds, 6.9 assists, 5.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Coby White 29.6 points, 6.5 rebounds, 7.5 assists, 4.9 turnovers, 2.0 steals
Trae Young 40.4 points, 5.8 rebounds, 12.9 assists, 7.7 turnovers, 2.5 steals
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,935
- And1: 6,236
- Joined: Jun 22, 2017
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Klomp wrote:Extended out those stats a little more
College stats, per 100 possessions
Rob Dillingham 35.3 points, 6.8 rebounds, 9.0 assists, 4.6 turnovers, 2.4 steals
De'Aaron Fox 30.4 points, 7.2 rebounds, 8.3 assists, 4.4 turnovers, 2.7 steals
Darius Garland 33.8 points, 7.9 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 6.3 turnovers, 1.7 steals
Kyrie Irving 36.1 points, 7.0 rebounds, 8.8 assists, 5.1 turnovers, 3.0 steals
Malik Monk 33.3 points, 4.2 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 3.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Collin Sexton 36.5 points, 7.2 rebounds, 6.9 assists, 5.3 turnovers, 1.6 steals
Coby White 29.6 points, 6.5 rebounds, 7.5 assists, 4.9 turnovers, 2.0 steals
Trae Young 40.4 points, 5.8 rebounds, 12.9 assists, 7.7 turnovers, 2.5 steals
Thanks. Trae's points and assists are ridonkulous.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,913
- And1: 2,533
- Joined: Jun 03, 2017
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Don't dilly dally around the topic...get to the bottom of it.Colbinii wrote:shrink wrote:Minneapolis is the home of Dairy Queen - they need to get him on board.
Especially if he can drop a bar or two
Sent from my N152DL using RealGM mobile app
Glen Taylor: "Is this moron #1 (Layden)? Put moron #2 (Thibs) on the phone."
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,357
- And1: 19,393
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,097
- And1: 22,625
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.
In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter
He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.
In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter
He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,105
- And1: 5,722
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Klomp wrote:I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.
In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter
He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.
If we had Monte it would go that deep. Without Monte, he is in by default. You don’t want to force Ant to PG whenever Mike is off the floor. NAW is not a PG and cannot really play make. So unless your gonna replace RD with whoever we get as the 3rd string, he is gonna be 15-25 minutes a night or more in the playoffs.
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 69,097
- And1: 22,625
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.
In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter
He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.
If we had Monte it would go that deep. Without Monte, he is in by default. You don’t want to force Ant to PG whenever Mike is off the floor. NAW is not a PG and cannot really play make. So unless your gonna replace RD with whoever we get as the 3rd string, he is gonna be 15-25 minutes a night or more in the playoffs.
Here I'm referring to the role as what his job is on the court, not necessarily the minutes he is playing.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,105
- And1: 5,722
- Joined: Feb 27, 2020
Re: The Rob Dillingham Thread
Klomp wrote:winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:I think about how Jordan McLaughlin was often a last-ditch effort to infuse life into the offense.
In Game 5 against Dallas, we closed the first half with him after we we were down 20
In Game 3 against Denver, Finch subbed him in down 17 in the second quarter
He was effective in pushing the pace some, but he was reliant on getting others involved because he couldn't get his own shot effectively. I think that's the kind of role I could see Dillingham in right away, though obviously he will be more than just on an emergency basis. I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.
If we had Monte it would go that deep. Without Monte, he is in by default. You don’t want to force Ant to PG whenever Mike is off the floor. NAW is not a PG and cannot really play make. So unless your gonna replace RD with whoever we get as the 3rd string, he is gonna be 15-25 minutes a night or more in the playoffs.
Here I'm referring to the role as what his job is on the court, not necessarily the minutes he is playing.
My bad, I saw “ I think his shot creation will be the determining factor on if he can play in the postseason, not necessarily his defense.” Then assumed you were talking about minutes.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves