ImageImageImage

The Jarrett Culver Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#281 » by Jedzz » Tue Oct 1, 2019 5:45 pm

Foye wrote:Culver is going to be a pretty decent player I believe. Right pick for once.


That's great. But let's let him hit the game floor first before the claims hit the floor.

I just don't want hype basketball. I'm not selling tickets and I'm just guessing that you aren't either. That's the team's job and that's what these reports are.

If Culver is already special, that's wonderful. But if he ends up looking like a rookie that's fine too, as long as he isn't a 35 minute starter because of hype - if that's all he is right now.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,409
And1: 17,369
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#282 » by Calinks » Tue Oct 1, 2019 7:49 pm

Cant get my hopes up too high have heard this all before. Got to see him in action.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,328
And1: 6,823
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#283 » by life_saver » Tue Oct 1, 2019 11:00 pm

I don't doubt Culver's work ethic but I think the biggest question regarding Culver is whether he can become an efficient shooter or not.
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#284 » by mandurugo » Wed Oct 2, 2019 3:37 am

Jedzz wrote:
Foye wrote:Culver is going to be a pretty decent player I believe. Right pick for once.


That's great. But let's let him hit the game floor first before the claims hit the floor.

I just don't want hype basketball. I'm not selling tickets and I'm just guessing that you aren't either. That's the team's job and that's what these reports are.

If Culver is already special, that's wonderful. But if he ends up looking like a rookie that's fine too, as long as he isn't a 35 minute starter because of hype - if that's all he is right now.


Fair point. Your multiple points about Nowell somewhat belie it. Hopefully both rookies will succeed to the level of their supporters.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#285 » by Jedzz » Wed Oct 2, 2019 12:45 pm

mandurugo wrote:
Jedzz wrote:
Foye wrote:Culver is going to be a pretty decent player I believe. Right pick for once.


That's great. But let's let him hit the game floor first before the claims hit the floor.

I just don't want hype basketball. I'm not selling tickets and I'm just guessing that you aren't either. That's the team's job and that's what these reports are.

If Culver is already special, that's wonderful. But if he ends up looking like a rookie that's fine too, as long as he isn't a 35 minute starter because of hype - if that's all he is right now.


Fair point. Your multiple points about Nowell somewhat belie it. Hopefully both rookies will succeed to the level of their supporters.


That's fair to say, as I have been adamant about Nowell. But I've also tried hard to show what he's already shown on a court in doing so. I haven't just been make fantastical claims with heresay, or claiming he should be a starter or unseat our PG vet. Just that what he's shown should earn him a shot at minutes to continue to prove himself instead of the alternative. The claims on Culver have obviously been much more rampant and wide spread.

Agreed, hopefully both succeed.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,403
And1: 6,390
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#286 » by KGdaBom » Thu Oct 3, 2019 9:05 pm

Rookie-Mistake wrote:Will he start?


Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using RealGM mobile app

Yes. I think from Day one, but certainly before December.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,403
And1: 6,390
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#287 » by KGdaBom » Thu Oct 3, 2019 9:09 pm

Jedzz wrote:
mandurugo wrote:
Jedzz wrote:
That's great. But let's let him hit the game floor first before the claims hit the floor.

I just don't want hype basketball. I'm not selling tickets and I'm just guessing that you aren't either. That's the team's job and that's what these reports are.

If Culver is already special, that's wonderful. But if he ends up looking like a rookie that's fine too, as long as he isn't a 35 minute starter because of hype - if that's all he is right now.


Fair point. Your multiple points about Nowell somewhat belie it. Hopefully both rookies will succeed to the level of their supporters.


That's fair to say, as I have been adamant about Nowell. But I've also tried hard to show what he's already shown on a court in doing so. I haven't just been make fantastical claims with heresay, or claiming he should be a starter or unseat our PG vet. Just that what he's shown should earn him a shot at minutes to continue to prove himself instead of the alternative. The claims on Culver have obviously been much more rampant and wide spread.

Agreed, hopefully both succeed.

Jedzz I encourage you to prepare for the shock of Culver being better than Nowell. Honestly I will be shocked if Nowell is better than Culver.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,303
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#288 » by thinktank » Thu Oct 3, 2019 9:24 pm

Nowell may be a better shooter than Culver but that’s probably his only advantage, if that.

Culver is likely to be a significantly better defender, as good or better passer and rebounder, and Culver is way more athletic. I think Culver’s athleticism will surprise folks. He’s got a 40 something inch vertical leap that nobody even talks about.
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#289 » by Jedzz » Fri Oct 4, 2019 12:22 am

KGdaBom wrote:Jedzz I encourage you to prepare for the shock of Culver being better than Nowell. Honestly I will be shocked if Nowell is better than Culver.


I encourage you to stop comparing them.

Why must you compare them? I'm not. The only comparison made here has been about the level of claims and amount of claims. For almost everyone is just anointing Culver as a starter in the NBA without ever seeing him play in the NBA yet. That's a crazy difference from basically just me claiming Nowell deserves a roster spot and some minutes to prove he deserves to be here and not stashed in the G league. At least lately I've seen a few here add Nowell to the back end of their lineups which is better than not listing him at all.

Can you admit no one has been comparing them as players? One has the top 10 first round draft hype. One does not. For most people that seems to be the difference of wanting a player to start asap or else sent to the G league. That's as deep as it goes and it seems their whole career is defined forever already. Sorry, I'm not that shallow.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#290 » by Klomp » Fri Oct 4, 2019 12:55 am

Jedzz wrote:I encourage you to stop comparing them.

Why must you compare them? I'm not. The only comparison made here has been about the level of claims and amount of claims. For almost everyone is just anointing Culver as a starter in the NBA without ever seeing him play in the NBA yet. That's a crazy difference from basically just me claiming Nowell deserves a roster spot and some minutes to prove he deserves to be here and not stashed in the G league. At least lately I've seen a few here add Nowell to the back end of their lineups which is better than not listing him at all.

Can you admit no one has been comparing them as players? One has the top 10 first round draft hype. One does not. For most people that seems to be the difference of wanting a player to start asap or else sent to the G league. That's as deep as it goes and it seems their whole career is defined forever already. Sorry, I'm not that shallow.

You were comparing them this summer...
Jedzz wrote:Does anyone here have an open enough mind to see a possibility that Jaylen Nowell could already be, or eventually be, a better NBA player than Culver?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#291 » by Jedzz » Fri Oct 4, 2019 12:03 pm

Klomp wrote:You were comparing them this summer...
Jedzz wrote:Does anyone here have an open enough mind to see a possibility that Jaylen Nowell could already be, or eventually be, a better NBA player than Culver?


No. That is a question I posed to people to get them to look inwards and reassess how they are annointing our top draft picks as instant starters but can't leave space in their noggins for the possibility that others could be better players.

As you once tried to tell me Klomp, "Reading is hard."
beezy
Sophomore
Posts: 127
And1: 52
Joined: Aug 15, 2017

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#292 » by beezy » Fri Oct 4, 2019 12:36 pm

Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,764
And1: 5,254
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#293 » by minimus » Fri Oct 4, 2019 1:54 pm

beezy wrote:Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?


I think he has just enough athleticism to play in NBA. What I want to see from him now is healthy decision making skills and shot selection. I believe that he has enough tools to succeed but the most importan is his feel for the game. Plus I hope he will continue to develop his jumpshot, I see him as Victor Oladipo type of player. 18ppg + 4rpg + 4apg next season.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,303
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#294 » by thinktank » Fri Oct 4, 2019 2:10 pm

beezy wrote:Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?


I’m not buying the claim he has “college athlete” athleticism. The guy can sky. This is hang from your armpit vert:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/chicagobulls/comments/bw34gh/jarret_culver_vertical_jump/
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,403
And1: 6,390
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#295 » by KGdaBom » Fri Oct 4, 2019 3:31 pm

beezy wrote:Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?

I Highly doubt that Culver will get many shots blocked at all. He is tall and long for his position and has a 40 plus inch vertical.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,403
And1: 6,390
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#296 » by KGdaBom » Fri Oct 4, 2019 3:32 pm

minimus wrote:
beezy wrote:Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?


I think he has just enough athleticism to play in NBA. What I want to see from him now is healthy decision making skills and shot selection. I believe that he has enough tools to succeed but the most importan is his feel for the game. Plus I hope he will continue to develop his jumpshot, I see him as Victor Oladipo type of player. 18ppg + 4rpg + 4apg next season.

I would be very good with Victor Oladipo 2.0.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 23,403
And1: 6,390
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#297 » by KGdaBom » Fri Oct 4, 2019 3:36 pm

thinktank wrote:
beezy wrote:Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?


I’m not buying the claim he has “college athlete” athleticism. The guy can sky. This is hang from your armpit vert:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/chicagobulls/comments/bw34gh/jarret_culver_vertical_jump/

Great pic. Any player who can get his head above the rim is a skywalker and his head is easily above the rim.
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,303
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#298 » by thinktank » Fri Oct 4, 2019 5:26 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
thinktank wrote:
beezy wrote:Culver is a big enigma to me right now. Of the clips I've watched of him the biggest thing I think he'll struggle with is the athleticism of the NBA. He looks like a good "college athlete" to me. He's going to get his share of balls blocked back in his face for a while. Can he adjust?


I’m not buying the claim he has “college athlete” athleticism. The guy can sky. This is hang from your armpit vert:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/chicagobulls/comments/bw34gh/jarret_culver_vertical_jump/

Great pic. Any player who can get his head above the rim is a skywalker and his head is easily above the rim.


In the comments it says Lakers do a two-step vertical measurement and Culver’s was FORTY FIVE INCHES.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,616
And1: 22,978
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#299 » by Klomp » Fri Oct 4, 2019 5:32 pm

thinktank wrote:In the comments it says Lakers do a two-step vertical measurement and Culver’s was FORTY FIVE INCHES.

The two-step is the standard at the combine, but I think the Lakers let that slide a bit at their workouts. Anyways, for comparison Zach LaVine had a 46 inch vert at his Lakers workout.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
thinktank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,303
And1: 2,641
Joined: Jul 02, 2010
Location: Mpls

Re: The Jarrett Culver Thread 

Post#300 » by thinktank » Fri Oct 4, 2019 5:36 pm

Klomp wrote:
thinktank wrote:In the comments it says Lakers do a two-step vertical measurement and Culver’s was FORTY FIVE INCHES.

The two-step is the standard at the combine, but I think the Lakers let that slide a bit at their workouts. Anyways, for comparison Zach LaVine had a 46 inch vert at his Lakers workout.


I remember that about Zach.

Why do you think they let it slide? Just curious. Are their measurements more generous than other teams or something?

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves