ImageImageImage

2016 draft thread: Part 2

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,627
And1: 1,804
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#661 » by Grits n Gravy » Mon May 23, 2016 5:22 pm

I'd definitely give up Bazz to move up to get Bender. I would really have to think about it if Gorgui was the price.
ace625214
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,463
And1: 604
Joined: May 31, 2014

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#662 » by ace625214 » Mon May 23, 2016 5:36 pm

Takingbaconback wrote:
ace625214 wrote:I'm not sure if you realize how good JJ Redick is and how important he is to the Clippers. He led the league in 3pt% by over 2%. Having someone with his shooting ability on this team would basically transform our offense.


I don't think you understand how good LaVine is and how good he is going to be. How would JJ Redick transform the offense? He would replace the one guy who was actually a good perimeter shooter for the wolves, not to mention his athleticism and speed and handle with the ball which JJ does not have.

This is the problem with Ricky supporters. You can't have your cake and eat it too. LaVine is and will be an even better shooter, he is not the problem when you talk about the lack of shooting on the team. Rubio is the primary problem, look to draft a guy like Murray if you really want to solve wolves shooting woes who can backup Rubio and eventually take over in a year or two.



What does Rubio have to do with having Redick in the lineup? I'm talking about having one great shooter, not a lineup full. Having an elite shooter changes your offense, and JJ does it more than the average elite shooter. Redick's off-ball work and the level of attention he commands are an entire level higher than Zach's. JJ isn't just some good shooter. He's one of the 3 best shooters in the league and one of the best we've ever seen at running off screens and releasing the ball quickly.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,601
And1: 24,746
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#663 » by GopherIt! » Mon May 23, 2016 5:43 pm

Saltine wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Saltine wrote:Dunn has also had 2 major surgeries on his shoulder, he has a bunch of screws in there... :o

There's only a 10% chance of re-injury, and he's changed up a lot of his in-game mechanics and daily routines since then.

http://www.si.com/college-basketball/2015/02/18/kris-dunn-providence-friars-shoulder

The surgeons in my family would like to knowing if that's per hour? week? or month? That's an absurd thing for a doctor to say, total BS. So if he goes up for a layup, gets knocked sideways and lands on that shoulder, we roll a ten sided die?


Kris Dunn
NPC: Friar
HP: 22
AC: -2
Strength: 16
Constitution: 15
Dexterity: 17
+1 shoulder wrap of protection
Air Jordan Bastard sword
Nike Dunk Pro Dagger
15 million gold pieces (guaranteed)
Wells Fargo Bag of Holding
TaylorTag
Rookie
Posts: 1,010
And1: 376
Joined: Jul 11, 2014
       

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#664 » by TaylorTag » Mon May 23, 2016 6:17 pm

A Celtics fan proposed in the trade board #5 for Avery Bradley #16 and #23

I think I'd do that
User avatar
Maefteda
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,600
And1: 575
Joined: Feb 18, 2012
     

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#665 » by Maefteda » Mon May 23, 2016 6:54 pm

I'd rather do a straight up swap #5 for Jae Crowder if possible. His contract even extends to the year Towns gets his first huge salary.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,744
And1: 1,965
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#666 » by jpatrick » Mon May 23, 2016 7:35 pm

Maefteda wrote:I'd rather do a straight up swap #5 for Jae Crowder if possible. His contract even extends to the year Towns gets his first huge salary.


This would be a no brainer. Crowder was arguably their most important player last year.
Sugarless
Veteran
Posts: 2,526
And1: 2,211
Joined: Aug 12, 2004

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#667 » by Sugarless » Mon May 23, 2016 8:03 pm

That's a nice thought but they're not doing that. Boston's looking to win now and they have 8 picks in this draft. They're not getting a 9th one and letting go of one of their most important players and their only above average SF, who's also on an extremely favorable contract.
MNister
Ballboy
Posts: 33
And1: 21
Joined: Dec 28, 2010

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#668 » by MNister » Mon May 23, 2016 10:11 pm

Wolves should still go BPA. Yes I'd like to see guys with shooting and rebounding to be placed higher on their draft board but the perceived holes at W and PF can be filled in house. We still need more talent.

You can justify any selection really, with possible exception of a poor shooting W like J.Brown.

-Dunn, at worst, provides depth, lockdown D and insurance for often injured Rubio.
-Hield and Murray both can provide spacing and scoring. Both would fit in just fine with Rubio/Lavine.
-Bender gives KAT a high upside partner and provides more shooting/spacing.
-Ellenson, should be pan out, would be a near perfect stretch 4 offensively in modern NBA and fill big need.

Point is that the Wolves should just take the most talented player. We can pencil in Rubio/Wiggins/Towns into our lineup. Towns and Wiggins can play two positions, but let's assume Wiggins plays SF and Towns at C. That leaves plenty of options to fit in our current players and future picks. We have a ton of flexibility. I say make a draftboard, reward guys that shoot and rebound well on that draftboard and just go BPA at 5. If that is Dunn, so be it.

PG: RUBIO (Dunn)
SG: Lavine (Murray/Hield)
SF: WIGGINS Muhammed
PF: Dieng, Bjelica (Bender/Ellenson)
C: TOWNS, Pekovic
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#669 » by Krapinsky » Tue May 24, 2016 5:48 am

Jimmy Butler: 6'7.5" wingspan and 8'5.5" standing reach
Buddy Hield: 6'9.25" wingspan and 8'5" standing reach
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,527
And1: 22,910
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#670 » by Klomp » Tue May 24, 2016 6:24 am

Fun fact: Jimmy Butler was 22 for his entire rookie year. Too old. He'll never amount to anything.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
esm1885
Sophomore
Posts: 105
And1: 14
Joined: May 03, 2016

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#671 » by esm1885 » Tue May 24, 2016 7:25 am

nbadraft has ellenson at 17 and draftexpress has him at 13 - would giving up Shabazz be enough for a late lottery pick i.e Utah or Chicago so we can take him aswell as Murray at 5?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#672 » by Krapinsky » Tue May 24, 2016 2:09 pm

esm1885 wrote:nbadraft has ellenson at 17 and draftexpress has him at 13 - would giving up Shabazz be enough for a late lottery pick i.e Utah or Chicago so we can take him aswell as Murray at 5?


Two thoughts (1) I don't think it would be enough, but with the right team/fit you never know, and (2) I don't see Thibs wanting to make the roster younger by making such a trade.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
MrTwister
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,500
And1: 1,081
Joined: Jan 06, 2013
Location: Montenegro
 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#673 » by MrTwister » Tue May 24, 2016 8:13 pm

Klomp wrote:Fun fact: Jimmy Butler was 22 for his entire rookie year. Too old. He'll never amount to anything.

Image
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,913
And1: 1,078
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#674 » by Dewey » Tue May 24, 2016 8:19 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Jimmy Butler: 6'7.5" wingspan and 8'5.5" standing reach
Buddy Hield: 6'9.25" wingspan and 8'5" standing reach


The "Doctors" in my family (=Vomit) would suggest those 2 winspan measurements are compareable :lol:
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
Killboard
Analyst
Posts: 3,374
And1: 943
Joined: Jul 16, 2010

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#675 » by Killboard » Tue May 24, 2016 8:41 pm

Buller allstar value come from his two-way all around game. Hield isnt udersized to play the 2, he just isnt a very good defender.
He could be a valuable player anyway like redick is, but its hard to think he will be a defensive presence like butler is.

As the time pass Im buying more into picking murray, dunn or hield. They would bring different things to the team.

Murray and Hield are both good off ball players. However I think Hield is better athlete due to age, and probably the best shooter with his feet set. In the other hand Murray has more potential like a playmaker down the road. He had impressive numbers for a freshman. However is not clear if he will be an average defender even down the road.

Dunn has the better phisical tools and defensive potential. He would be a great backup to rubio, even if he shares his lack of spacing would be a better scorer and compensate his lack of elite vision. He would be some steps above Tyus, and have a capable backup PG is good to have. It gives you easier offense against bench players, and makes the opossing offensive unit at least move the ball instead of just blow someone off with a pick. His shoulder should be a concern however.

The way our roster its build we should bring another bigger wing/stretch 4. If that happens take one of Hield or Murray and the minutes are hard to distribute (but not impossible). Picking Dunn you put Tyus minutes on ice, but I dont think he is ready right now to be a PG backup in a .500 team.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#676 » by moss_is_1 » Tue May 24, 2016 10:30 pm

I think Hield measuring out well for his wingspan is good news for his defensive potential. He won't be a lockdown guy, but his long arms will help a lot in the passing lanes at least. I think he will project as a better defensive player than Murray, who Cal basically called terrible on that end all season. If Hield is Reddick offensively, then he'd be a great player. Reddick isn't terrible on defense, but like Murray has a pretty short wingspan.
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#677 » by moss_is_1 » Tue May 24, 2016 11:18 pm

Another thing I love about Murray...Ranked #1 in the country shooting off of screens. Also has a lot of moves driving to the basket(finishes at 59% at the rim), and is good at drawing fouls inside.
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#678 » by southern wolf » Wed May 25, 2016 3:47 am

I just hope we get one of the best shooters. I don't watch enough college ball to properly decide between Hield and Murray, but Hield seems like more of a SG and has the better nickname so I'm siding with him. #believeinbuddy
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,601
And1: 24,746
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#679 » by GopherIt! » Wed May 25, 2016 5:26 am

Krapinsky wrote:Jimmy Butler: 6'7.5" wingspan and 8'5.5" standing reach
Buddy Hield: 6'9.25" wingspan and 8'5" standing reach



Image
Dleavitt24
Junior
Posts: 331
And1: 61
Joined: Mar 26, 2015
 

Re: 2016 draft thread: Part 2 

Post#680 » by Dleavitt24 » Wed May 25, 2016 3:19 pm

Don't be surprised if we pick Dunn. I'm a fan of rubio and would agree that he is a smart and superior defender, especially team wise. But if you think we have the defensive guard depth to defend a Westbrook in a 7 game series I'd argue your wrong. OKC right now is using there athleticism and length against GS and making them look like they don't even belong there.

Not saying he's our guy and he's all we should be looking at. Obviously we need shooting. But I trust thibs to put us in the best position to win not just in the regular season but in the playoffs. I believe he will be looking hard on how he can get more defense out of that 1-2 position.

For me my big board would look like this.
1. Dunn
2. Heild (with lavine playing some PG again)
3. brown (can play strong limited defensive role first yr)
4. Murray/bender

*Most important thing is playoffs experience for this team. So we need some players that can contribute right away. Heild and Dunn give us the best in the draft at what this team needs. Shooting or defense.
If we choose brown we can make use of him because of his NBA ready body and skill set
But if we have to choose Murray or bender - we better get our dleague team up and rolling because I believe these two will be really good but not ready to contribute to winning nxt year.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves