ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part Five)

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

mercgold3
General Manager
Posts: 8,745
And1: 2,821
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1061 » by mercgold3 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 4:57 pm

jpatrick wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:Would Orlando be willing to send Okeke out? Say for Okoge or Culver? I know he is coming off an injury, but from a fit standpoint he is ideal right now


Still think Gordon is the one that gets shipped out sometime between now and the trade deadline. I think they see Okeke as a big part of their future. He would have gone top ten in that draft year if he hadn’t just torn his ACL.
Better be now.

We really need a PF for the start of the season.

Make it happen Rosas.
old school 34
Junior
Posts: 306
And1: 134
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1062 » by old school 34 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 5:16 pm

samyell wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
samyell wrote:It would be really nice to be able to get a draft pick in next years draft considering we have none right now. I'd be happy with a 2nd even. We also need to open up some spots as we are sitting right at 15 if we sign juancho.

I'm getting nervous about us signing Juancho. We need him even if we sign a FA PF.



at least we can match anything thrown his way. The only way he is not here is someone offers him something huge. We could do a sign and trade there.
I'm still assuming we'll match Jauncho & JMac...just letting the market play out...as there was maybe a lesser market for those two.

And that will eat most of our existing room...maybe we can squeeze a 3rd C on a minimum as well?

Waiting until Trade deadline...allows maybe some of more options & trading for something bigger @ PF....or this is the list that kind of looks like we could consider in a trade if consolidated some of the assets that look might be outside of the rotation (best guess)....

So Culver/Evans/Spellman/Nowell...gives you 11.6 to work with (kept Okogie out of this just cause best guess & JMac...cause I believe if he were to be incl...then S&T rules would cause us to be hard capped...everything should be on table, but just where I started).

Possible options (besides rookies):

1. SAC...2 of Belly/Holmes/Giles/Bagley...rumor that they want to get younger...new GM?

2. HOU....Tucker & House...teardown continues?

3. MEM....Winston...always hurt?

4. MIL....DJ Wilson...they have a lot of roster spots still to fill? Might aid them in a different variation of S&T?

5. LAL....Kuzma....similar to Milwaukee...

6. CLE....Nance...would be my first choice....just don't see why Cle would take the PR move trading him out.

7. CHI...not sure Lauri or WCJ are really going anywhere, but what about Gafford &/or T. Young?

8. IND...Warren

9. ATL...Collins/Hunter...seemingly has a glut of bigs?

10. MIA...Olynyk

11. BRK....Kurucs/Prince??

12. LAC....Kabengele

There's others...but couldn't come up with something that the other team would consider moving (ie--Cha isn't moving PJ; Dal wouldn't move Kleber or Powell; etc....maybe in a 3-team, I guess?)

Any of these stand out better or worse?

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
TwolvesFanRome
Pro Prospect
Posts: 852
And1: 250
Joined: Aug 25, 2014
Location: Roma
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1063 » by TwolvesFanRome » Sun Nov 22, 2020 7:59 pm

What about:

Culver Juancho and some picks
For
J.Collins

Culver and Spellman
For
M.Kleber
"...I want to compliment him, we all expected that he would take up the game, we have prepared the plan race on him, we have doubled. And, as usual, he did what he wanted..."

Zelimir Obradovic, talking about Dejan Bodiroga
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 13,671
And1: 17,528
Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1064 » by Domejandro » Sun Nov 22, 2020 9:54 pm

Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, Jaylen Nowell, and a second or two

For

Nemanja Bjelica

Why for Minnesota? Substantial improvement.
Why for Sacramento? Gamble on a few young players and picks.
MN7725
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 585
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1065 » by MN7725 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 10:14 pm

Domejandro wrote:Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, Jaylen Nowell, and a second or two

For

Nemanja Bjelica

Why for Minnesota? Substantial improvement.
Why for Sacramento? Gamble on a few young players and picks.


Is Bjelica still expected to be starter this year?

I know he was last year because of Bagley's injury, but he played so well
wolves_89
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 2,059
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1066 » by wolves_89 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 10:17 pm

MN7725 wrote:
Domejandro wrote:Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, Jaylen Nowell, and a second or two

For

Nemanja Bjelica

Why for Minnesota? Substantial improvement.
Why for Sacramento? Gamble on a few young players and picks.


Is Bjelica still expected to be starter this year?

I know he was last year because of Bagley's injury, but he played so well


It's hard to know what direction the Kings will go. They have Bagley and Parker at PF along with Barnes who should be playing PF. I could see the Kings moving on from Bjelica, it was a real question if they were even going to guarantee his contract.
minimus
General Manager
Posts: 8,606
And1: 2,215
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1067 » by minimus » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:03 pm

I must go and sleep, but when I wake up, I hope to see Evans and Spellman traded and JMac and Martin re-signed for team friendly deals.
IceManBK1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,854
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1068 » by IceManBK1 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:05 pm

minimus wrote:I must go and sleep, but when I wake up, I hope to see Evans and Spellman traded and JMac and Martin re-signed for team friendly deals.


nth's happening..we are set...we probly just ship evans and spellman to knicks to shred some salary. Knicks a dumpster yard now unwanted players..they have a ton of cap space to absorb contracts.
Neeva
Analyst
Posts: 3,299
And1: 1,070
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1069 » by Neeva » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:06 pm

Domejandro wrote:Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, Jaylen Nowell, and a second or two

For

Nemanja Bjelica

Why for Minnesota? Substantial improvement.
Why for Sacramento? Gamble on a few young players and picks.


Jesus didn’t thibs lose him for
Nothing and sac will get Nowell and two second round picks?
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,788
And1: 639
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1070 » by Dewey » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:11 pm

We pretty much gave away Saric and Bjelica for peanuts ... can expect others to feel sorry for us
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
IceManBK1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,854
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1071 » by IceManBK1 » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:51 pm

Is Pacers still trying to trade Turner? I'd give Culver, Spellman, Evans and future top 15 protected 1st.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 13,671
And1: 17,528
Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Location: San Diego, California

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1072 » by Domejandro » Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:52 pm

Neeva wrote:
Domejandro wrote:Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, Jaylen Nowell, and a second or two

For

Nemanja Bjelica

Why for Minnesota? Substantial improvement.
Why for Sacramento? Gamble on a few young players and picks.


Jesus didn’t thibs lose him for
Nothing and sac will get Nowell and two second round picks?

We let Nemanja Bjelica walk in Free Agency, but even if we didn’t, a move from two seasons ago is completely irrelevant to the current situation.
IceManBK1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,854
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1073 » by IceManBK1 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:00 am

Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20


We got big Ed..he had great chemistry with dlo on the PnR back on the nets..Rosas with the late moves! Good job!
IceManBK1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,854
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1074 » by IceManBK1 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:03 am

Aaron Gordon for Culver, Okogie, future protected 1st next? I still believe in you, Rosas!
Neeva
Analyst
Posts: 3,299
And1: 1,070
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1075 » by Neeva » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:15 am

IceManBK1 wrote:Aaron Gordon for Culver, Okogie, future protected 1st next? I still believe in you, Rosas!


I cant anymore stop overvaluing Gordon jesus.
mercgold3
General Manager
Posts: 8,745
And1: 2,821
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1076 » by mercgold3 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:17 am

IceManBK1 wrote:Aaron Gordon for Culver, Okogie, future protected 1st next? I still believe in you, Rosas!
I'm on board for Gordon but that's way too much... Drop the future 1st and we start talking...
IceManBK1
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,854
And1: 127
Joined: Jul 14, 2017
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1077 » by IceManBK1 » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:20 am

mercgold3 wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:Aaron Gordon for Culver, Okogie, future protected 1st next? I still believe in you, Rosas!
I'm on board for Gordon but that's way too much... Drop the future 1st and we start talking...


top 20 protected pick is nth..you barely get sth good in the late 20s. and we're overvaluing culver a bit too much.
Neeva
Analyst
Posts: 3,299
And1: 1,070
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1078 » by Neeva » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:22 am

Culver had a better rookie year than Gordon had and that aint saying much. Culver’s potential is good.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,788
And1: 639
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1079 » by Dewey » Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:22 am

IceManBK1 wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:Aaron Gordon for Culver, Okogie, future protected 1st next? I still believe in you, Rosas!
I'm on board for Gordon but that's way too much... Drop the future 1st and we start talking...


top 20 protected pick is nth..you barely get sth good in the late 20s. and we're overvaluing culver a bit too much.

Ya ... NO to a deal with both Culver and any type of future 1st
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 45,239
And1: 5,867
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part Five) 

Post#1080 » by shrink » Mon Nov 23, 2020 2:22 am

Neeva wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:Aaron Gordon for Culver, Okogie, future protected 1st next? I still believe in you, Rosas!


I cant anymore stop overvaluing Gordon jesus.

Or at least suggest legal trades.

The only way we could match his $18.1 mil is trading Rubio, or Beasley when FA’s become trade eligible .. probably in February.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves