ImageImageImage

Let's keep Mike Miller

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,522
And1: 4,979
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#1 » by theGreatRC » Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:33 pm

1. contract year next year
2. More comfortable in the system (
3. Hopefully we can move Foye, so we need another legit scorer
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#2 » by B Calrissian » Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:38 pm

What is this system you speak of?
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#3 » by JMillott » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:01 am

I think they should keep him as the sixth man as well.

Gomes, Smith and Cardinal should be traded with the Jazz pick to get an actual starting SF here.

Luol Deng
Richard Jefferson
Josh Howard
Corey Maggette
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,522
And1: 4,979
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#4 » by theGreatRC » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:11 am

B Calrissian wrote:What is this system you speak of?


meh, meant with the players. Replace system with players.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#5 » by jade_hippo » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:53 am

a guy who shoots 3-5 every night isn't exactly hard to come by... i'd rather keep gomes over miller for the fact that he makes about 1/3 of the sallary. if we still had KG, miller would be perfect getting 9/7/6 every night, but on this team thats not what we need. we need someone (i almost choked thinking about this, i did throw up a little in my mouth) like Ricky Davis who can get 17/5/4 and go off with spurts of 30 if he has to
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,703
And1: 22,273
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#6 » by Klomp » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:58 am

I'm starting to agree RC. I'd rather trade Foye than Miller this offseason if I had the choice.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#7 » by deeney0 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:17 am

Mike Miller is hardly a legit scorer.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#8 » by Krapinsky » Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:00 am

JMillott wrote:I think they should keep him as the sixth man as well.

Gomes, Smith and Cardinal should be traded with the Jazz pick to get an actual starting SF here.

Luol Deng
Richard Jefferson
Josh Howard
Corey Maggette


Those players aren't exactly playoff staples, with the exception of Howard who plays with Dirk. I'm more for finding a long term solution than a short term patch. Eventually that patch is just going to bust open again and we'll be back to square one.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
southern wolf
General Manager
Posts: 9,854
And1: 2,163
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Australia
   

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#9 » by southern wolf » Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:15 am

He clearly has to take more than 4 or 5 shots a game next season, but when you actually watch him on the floor you realise he's still helping in a lot of other ways. He's always hustling, crashing the boards, moving the ball around, throwing his body around. Plus he seems to be helping out Love and the other young pups, and encouraging them. I hope he sticks around at least for another season.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#10 » by revprodeji » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:02 am

Cannot underrate someone wanting to be here also.

The shooting is confusing. Does he not think he has the shots? Does he think he helps more by being a PG? Maybe if we surround him by scorers he will score? It is a weird thing.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#11 » by jade_hippo » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:33 am

I really LOVE what Miller does, when we had Marko, i preyed every night he could do that. 9/7/7 nights are great stat lines. The problem is we don't need someone to do that right now. We need someone in the backcourt to score and hit shots. Miller can do it, I've seen him hit 3's in peoples faces since he came into the league. 3 of 5 shooting with some nice hussle is great if you are Marko Jaric or Trenton Hassel. The problem is that Telfair and Foye are not always going to have great scoring nights. They could combine for 9 points or could combine for 50. a solie 17 a game would be a huge help on a nightly basis.
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#12 » by JMillott » Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:40 am

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:
JMillott wrote:I think they should keep him as the sixth man as well.

Gomes, Smith and Cardinal should be traded with the Jazz pick to get an actual starting SF here.

Luol Deng
Richard Jefferson
Josh Howard
Corey Maggette


Those players aren't exactly playoff staples, with the exception of Howard who plays with Dirk. I'm more for finding a long term solution than a short term patch. Eventually that patch is just going to bust open again and we'll be back to square one.


The best way to fiw a team is to get quality players at as many positions as possible. All of those four guys are better then what they've currently got.

Hashem Thabeet - Wolves pick
Stephen Curry - Use Heat and Celtics pick to trade up for him if need be
Ramon Sessions - Offer him the full MLE and the starting job and I think he'd sign

If they can deal for Deng, Jefferson, Howard or Maggette for nothing but expiring contracts, Gomes and the 2010 Jazz pick you're looking at an actual quality team.

PG Sessions - Curry - Telfair
SG Foye - Carney - Miller
SF ???? - Miller - Brewer
PF Jefferson - Love - Williams
C Thabeet - Jefferson - Williams
User avatar
tim_
Freshman
Posts: 69
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Contact:

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#13 » by tim_ » Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:13 am

He can play, and other teams know that. And for those reasons, I would love to see us move him and Cardinal, who both obviously have expiring deals next season. With those deals, and the fact that Miller aint bad as a player to begin with, maybe throw in Utah's first rounder, and you're looking at acquiring a decent player.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#14 » by Krapinsky » Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:27 am

This is wild. JMillott and I are pretty much polar opposites when it comes to basketball way of thinking. I don't like Curry or Thabeet b/c I think they're one trick ponies. Sessions, to me, is a rich man's Telfair. He excels in a running, spread offense. On the Wolves, his weaknesses (defense, poor shooter) become exaggerated, instead of hidden like they are in Milwaukee. Curry and Thabeet might be effective on the Wolves, but I see them as two more role players that have high bust potential.

Here's my thinking--

Trade: Cardinal/Telfair/Utah pick for Hinrich.

Draft: Evans with #6, Mullens with #18, Collison #28, Heytvelt #57

Sign and Trade: Gomes/Smith for Childress

Resign: Williams

Hinrich/Collison/Brown
Evans/Foye/Brewer
Childress/Miller/Brewer
Love/Williams/Heytvelt
Jefferson/Mullens/Heytvelt
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#15 » by JMillott » Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:50 am

Miller's trade value peaks during the coming season not this summer coming off a not so great year. They can either enjoy that increased value by trading him or using his likely increased production during a contract year by having him play well for them.

Ryan Gomes trade value on the other hand is as high as its going to get. It is absolutely the time to deal him to a team that thinks his production vs salary is worth more to them then a better but not so cheap player they don't want at the price they're paying.

Ryan Gomes, Craig Smith, Brian Cardinal the Jazz 2010 pick and 3 million dollars cash towards Cardinal's likely buyout would bring back a quality starter. As i've mentioned in other threads the league is full of SF's who make a little too much and are viewed as expandable.

Richard Jefferson
Luol Deng
Corey Maggette
Josh Howard
Caron Butler
Travis Outlaw
Andrei Kirilenko
Jason Richardson

All of them are possibly available for the type of package i've mentioned all without giving up Mike Miller this summer.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#16 » by deeney0 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:02 am

I appreciate that Miller does the little things, I really do, but he has been a GIANT disappointment this year, especially after Al went down. 3P% much lower than expected. Career lows in PPG, FGA, FTA, 3PA. I'm not convinced he wasn't going through the motions, and the "he wants to be here factor" is all based on preseason comments and I don't think it has a solid case any longer. He's supposed to be a SCORER. The Wolves needed him to take shots, and he passes up opportunities night in and night out.

Miller's value is that he's an expiring contract, and that value is mighty. It is most certainly worth exploring options if they come about.
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#17 » by JMillott » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:18 am

Actually Mike Miller has always kinda slowly asserted himself as a scorer and really at his best he is more of a 15/7/5 guy at the SF position then he is a bigtime scorer.

The main mistake the Wolves made was that he should clearly have been the starting SF from day one. He is vastly better at the SF position both offensively and defensively it just made no sense to waste him at SG in the beginning of the year.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#18 » by deeney0 » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:35 am

9.7 is lightyears away from 15.

Miller averages even less FGA/48 at SF than he does at SG (10.2 vs. 12.3), has a lower eFG% (54.5% vs. 58.3%). As you might expect, this gives less points per 48 (13.7 vs. 15.9) and a lower per (14.9 vs. 15.5). Position is not his issue.
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#19 » by JMillott » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:48 am

deeney0 wrote:9.7 is lightyears away from 15.

Miller averages even less FGA/48 at SF than he does at SG (10.2 vs. 12.3), has a lower eFG% (54.5% vs. 58.3%). As you might expect, this gives less points per 48 (13.7 vs. 15.9) and a lower per (14.9 vs. 15.5). Position is not his issue.


I disagree because the Wolves average 101points per 48 minutes with him at SF and 93 with him at SG.
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: Let's keep Mike Miller 

Post#20 » by the_bruce » Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:49 am

miller runs the team in every game ive watched over the past 2 months, but i dont watch many games these days. I have no complaints.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves