OKC Derozan @3?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
OKC Derozan @3?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,536
- And1: 57
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
OKC Derozan @3?
If OKC is actually thinking of Derozan @3, I think MN would be a great trade partner. Derozan is very probable to fall to us. If they jump on either harden or rubio I think MN has the correct kind of assets to accomodate a swap.
Miller + perkovic rights? + 6(derozan) for Collison + watson + 3(harden or Rubio)
Miller + perkovic rights? + 6(derozan) for Collison + watson + 3(harden or Rubio)
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
Seems like a lot to pay to move up. Maybe if Rubio is there, but I'd want at least a future 1st too.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,536
- And1: 57
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
I've always prefered Harden over Rubio to be honest. Plus MN can make the all old skool team of
Love + Al + Harden
Love + Al + Harden
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
I'd love to have Harden. He's my clear #3 in the draft, that's just a lot to pay for him. If we could get Green included in the deal somehow, I'm on board 100%
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
That's a bit too much to move up. I'd do it without the Pekovic rights, though. Maybe add in something else, maybe one of our other picks in this draft.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,536
- And1: 57
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
hmm I'd think that the key part of the trade would be pekovics rights. A Polished Euro center that can come fill the 5 spot in a year or 2 would be great for them.
Maybe something like...
Cards + pekovic rights + 6 for Watson + 3
Maybe something like...
Cards + pekovic rights + 6 for Watson + 3
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
Maybe we could use the 28th pick and/or our 2nd rounders instead of Pekovic's rights?
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- JR Rider
- Sophomore
- Posts: 191
- And1: 39
- Joined: Feb 27, 2008
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
don't give up pekovic rights... unless you think harden is an absolute future all-star... which i'm not... watching him play this past year he seemed extremely hesitant at the collegiate level - hes got great potential but im not THAT high on him. im not sure he'll be that much better than several other players that will be available, although it is a consensus that his draft stock is better at this point.
im fine with losing miller in that trade though.
im fine with losing miller in that trade though.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,536
- And1: 57
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
You all love pekovic to much, I blame rev. Pekovic is a replication of Al as far as I'm concerned, he isn't the 3rd big we need for our rotation. We need a long athletic faceup 4, who could play some 3. Earl Clark probably fits the mold of what I want.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- prefuse73
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,572
- And1: 44
- Joined: Feb 15, 2006
- Location: W1T1SG
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
I agree with bruceallen. If peck's rights can net us Harden or Rubio, I would jump all over it.
Cards and peck and #6 for Watson and #3 seems pretty decent to me. However, if they just pick him at 3, its more than likely that Thabeet would fall to us at 6....but i'd prefer Harden.
Cards and peck and #6 for Watson and #3 seems pretty decent to me. However, if they just pick him at 3, its more than likely that Thabeet would fall to us at 6....but i'd prefer Harden.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
I don't have any trouble with trading Pekovic's rights, I just think that including them, AND Miller, AND the 6 basically just for Harden is way too much value to give from our end. What other ammo would we have to make a trade? Just a couple of smaller expirings.
Like I said before, if we're giving that much, we should try to get Green in the trade and he fits what you said you want in Earl Clark, except that Green is more proven and has as much upside.
Like I said before, if we're giving that much, we should try to get Green in the trade and he fits what you said you want in Earl Clark, except that Green is more proven and has as much upside.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- deeney0
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,594
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Cambridge, MA
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
bruceallen61 wrote:You all love pekovic to much, I blame rev.
Thirded. This trade would be a must-do, in my mind, for anyone who has Harden well above the other guards. Me? I don't really see the separation, but Pek is a small price.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,895
- And1: 1,069
- Joined: May 22, 2001
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
That would be a goood deal if we could get Rubio with the pick. I'm not a Hardin guy up at #3, but would nab him at #6 odviously - and that is a possibility. This draft just is not real defined and I feel jittery about moving up for anyone outside of Griffin or Rubio.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Mayoistooslow
- Sophomore
- Posts: 137
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 14, 2008
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
if it's for rubio, sure. for harden...thats too much to give up. we could use the pick on players with just as much promise
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
If Sam Presti is seriously considering drafting DeRozan at 3 over Harden (and potentially Rubio), that's proof enough for me that DeRozan will be the better pro, and that we should draft him for ourselves.

Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,054
- And1: 3,612
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
Cut the rights for pekovic and I do that deal
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- Zeitgeister
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,714
- And1: 7,355
- Joined: Nov 11, 2008
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
AQuintus wrote:If Sam Presti is seriously considering drafting DeRozan at 3 over Harden (and potentially Rubio), that's proof enough for me that DeRozan will be the better pro, and that we should draft him for ourselves.
When you think about it, it might be a better idea. Harden has the higher floor for sure, but OKC already has two players who will be primary ball handlers in Durant and Westbrook. DeRozan will probably be the better defender, and he can definitely work off the ball and hit the occasional jumpber. Plus he will be able to catch oops from Westbrook etc. That would be a really good situation for him. Although I think Thabeet would be the best option for that team.
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: OKC Derozan @3?
I'd trade Pek's rights for a bag of Doritos.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves