ImageImageImage

MIN-POR-HOU

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#1 » by shrink » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:04 pm

HOU GIVES: Battier ($7) + McGrady ($23)
HOU GETS: POR Expirings ($7) + MIN Expirings ($19)

POR GIVES: Expiring ($7) + rights to Claver
POR GETS: Battier ($7)

MIN GIVES: Expirings ($19)
MIN GETS: McGrady's expiring ($23) + rights to Claver


HOU Savings:
$4.0 mil Salary
$3.0 mil Lux Taxes
$4.6 mil Lux Share
$11.6 mil 2009-10 Savings
$7.4 mil 2010-11 Savings (No Battier)
$19 mil TOTAL SAVINGS

In addition, moving Battier means they are at $38 mil in guaranteed salary + cap hold in 2010, so they could be a player in free agency. They should probably include more - maybe a protected 1st to MIN.

POR gets Battier to win now, at the cost of Claver. Claver's a nice prospect, but he's been inconsistent, he's injured, he carries a cap hold during the summer, and he doesn't help POR win now like Battier.

MIN buys Claver for $4 mil of their cap space, to encourage Rubio to come over a year earlier. They've barely played together, but another Spanierd on the team may make him feel more comfortable.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#2 » by Krapinsky » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:15 pm

Two concerns --

Houston is just as much in a position to win now as Portland.

Minnesota pays $4 million for the rights to Claver? I don't see anything positive from bringing McGrady on board because i really do not want to resign him.


Shrink I have a trade that I thought of last night but i can't seem to pull off anything that works unders the CBA -- The gist is a 4 team trade with POR, CHA, NY, MIN

Por gets Lee, NY gets Augustin, Cha gets Miller and MN helps with expirings to NY and gets an asset in return from Portland.

Maybe you can help with that one. I would appreciate it.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#3 » by shrink » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:43 pm

Perhaps including Gomes in the expirings would make some sense, with HOU's pick coming to us. $19 mil is a lot of savings, so I think including the pick seems fair. Gomes could be helpful in their fast-paced offense as well.

Claver was the #22 pick last year, but when he comes over, starts on a rookie scale deal. He's injured right now though -- $4 seemed reasonable to me.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#4 » by funkatron101 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:43 pm

You are getting lazy shrink. :lol: At least post who the expirings are.

Houston fans like Battier and insist that they aren't in money saving mode. They will need some other incentive if they are losing Battier, I think.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#5 » by the_bruce » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:45 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:Shrink I have a trade that I thought of last night but i can't seem to pull off anything that works unders the CBA -- The gist is a 4 team trade with POR, CHA, NY, MIN

Por gets Lee, NY gets Augustin, Cha gets Miller and MN helps with expirings to NY and gets an asset in return from Portland.

Maybe you can help with that one. I would appreciate it.


This is rough because of Lee's BYC status. This is the best I could come up with in 10 minutes

NYK IN: (save 12m this year)
Aug, Chandler, Blount, Cards, Wilkins, Pecherov, brewer, pavlovic

PDX in:
Lee, Jawai

CHA in:
Miller, Curry

MN in:
Milicic, Mobley, Hughes


CHA in curry for chandler. They were rumored to want Curry last year.

NYK saves tons of cash. Doesn't appear to hurt next years cap.

MN Mobleys contract is covered by insurance, but this is salary neutral as the wolves take back 6m extra salary this year.

I cant do any better without spending tons of time computing salaries by hand
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#6 » by the_bruce » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:46 pm

side note.

Hou is a better trade partner than MN for this sort of deal.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#7 » by shrink » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:47 pm

I love the trade value you are creating, by sending players to where they will be worth more. With this much trade value, it should be possible to make a trade that even most of the RealGM forum would approve. One problem though. I like Lee in POR, but their posters don't believe they will be able to retain him next season, so I'm curious what they'd pay.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#8 » by shrink » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:49 pm

funkatron101 wrote:You are getting lazy shrink. :lol: At least post who the expirings are.

Houston fans like Battier and insist that they aren't in money saving mode. They will need some other incentive if they are losing Battier, I think.


I don't think the loudest HOU poster is realistic when it comes to his team completely ignoring money. $19 mil is a lot of money .. Battier is not worth that much.

Oh, and you're right about me being lazy. I posted this as a demonstration to help someone else's deal, and though it'd be interesting for some readers here. It definitely needs flesh on the bones.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#9 » by Krapinsky » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:53 pm

bruceallen61 wrote:
Dr.Krapinsky wrote:Shrink I have a trade that I thought of last night but i can't seem to pull off anything that works unders the CBA -- The gist is a 4 team trade with POR, CHA, NY, MIN

Por gets Lee, NY gets Augustin, Cha gets Miller and MN helps with expirings to NY and gets an asset in return from Portland.

Maybe you can help with that one. I would appreciate it.


This is rough because of Lee's BYC status. This is the best I could come up with in 10 minutes

NYK IN: (save 12m this year)
Aug, Chandler, Blount, Cards, Wilkins, Pecherov, brewer, pavlovic

PDX in:
Lee, Jawai

CHA in:
Miller, Curry

MN in:
Milicic, Mobley, Hughes


CHA in curry for chandler. They were rumored to want Curry last year.

NYK saves tons of cash. Doesn't appear to hurt next years cap.

MN Mobleys contract is covered by insurance, but this is salary neutral as the wolves take back 6m extra salary this year.

I cant do any better without spending tons of time computing salaries by hand


Wow, no wonder I couldn't pull it off. I ddin't realize Lee was BYC -- i think that's what was throwing me off. Thanks for the help Bruce
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#10 » by funkatron101 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 6:59 pm

shrink wrote:
funkatron101 wrote:You are getting lazy shrink. :lol: At least post who the expirings are.

Houston fans like Battier and insist that they aren't in money saving mode. They will need some other incentive if they are losing Battier, I think.


I don't think the loudest HOU poster is realistic when it comes to his team completely ignoring money. $19 mil is a lot of money .. Battier is not worth that much.

Agreed. I just think that fans have a tough time swallowing financial savings when their team is exceeding expectations. They have a good shot at making the playoffs and trading Battier off can ruin that.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,342
And1: 12,198
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#11 » by Worm Guts » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:11 pm

That's something you've got evaluate when you consider this trade. Battier may not be worth 19 million dollars, but how much is it going to cost you to cut the legs out from under a playoff team? That's terrible PR.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,288
And1: 19,301
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#12 » by shrink » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:17 pm

Personally I don't think Battier is crucial to the new running style that HOU is being successful with these days, and it certainly wouldn't cut the legs out of that team. In fact, I think his decline probably has something to do with HOU's new style. However, I think that Battier would be a much better fit for what POR is trying to do.

Stick Gomes in the expiring pile, and include HOU's first. I think Gomes might be a better fit anyway -- he can certainly keep up with those youngin's.
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#13 » by the_bruce » Wed Dec 16, 2009 7:41 pm

I'm not in favor of trading gomes at all. He and session are such bargains even with a reduced salary cap.

Gomes will never be seen as good as some of the higher caliber 3's like butler, crash, etc. But he's also paid roughly half of what they make and produces about the same offensively. They all might be better defenders than gomes, but he's shown good defense against some very good players. Gomes also has a high bbiq and I think that high IQ will suit our new system more.

If MN trades Sessions or Gomes. I expect an upgrade, not a lateral move. I think crash & the other SF's in that salary range are lateral and I love butler & crash is one of my fav players.

With gomes we pay a guy 4-5m a year, but he produces similar to a guy making 8-10m.

With sessions we pay a guy 4m a year, but he produces similar to a guy making 6-10m.

MN probably saves ~7m over similar production "better" players.

I love the trade value you are creating, by sending players to where they will be worth more. With this much trade value, it should be possible to make a trade that even most of the RealGM forum would approve. One problem though. I like Lee in POR, but their posters don't believe they will be able to retain him next season, so I'm curious what they'd pay.


With PDX's recent injuries and miller not fitting into the scheme this seems like a good deal for them.
Basicly Miller for Lee (rental).

On MN's end it's simply moving expirings around. No benefit imo. I think if it was a 5 teamer with HOU included. You could send the expirings coming to MN for tmac and drop them under the lux + they get mobleys contract. Saving them what looks to be close to 20m this year. Tons of value. MN could get some use with TMac and he'd bring ppl to the games. Hou saving that much cash would definately need to send more value.

It's a good proposition for all teams if worked correctly, but would take time to iron all the wrinkles out.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#14 » by revprodeji » Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:12 pm

No.

Simple as that.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Varejao17
Rookie
Posts: 1,236
And1: 165
Joined: Sep 01, 2004
Location: Manaus-Amazonas-Brasil
     

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#15 » by Varejao17 » Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:47 pm

Not a good trade IMO...
Image
props to C.lupus
User avatar
mnWI
General Manager
Posts: 8,550
And1: 47
Joined: Dec 24, 2003
Location: Shaking babies and kissing hands

Re: MIN-POR-HOU 

Post#16 » by mnWI » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:17 am

In Darryl Morey's system of player evaluation, Shane Battier is grossly underpaid and as valuable on the court as most all-stars.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves