Would you trade #21 for Lopez/Randolph at #7?
Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO
- SportsFan215
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,992
- And1: 60
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
- SportsFan215
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,992
- And1: 60
- Joined: Jun 23, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,650
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jun 26, 2005
- Location: New Hampshire
SportsFan215 wrote:Ok I would offer as part of a multi-team deal:
Banks/Alexander Johnson/#7 for KVH/Ager/#10
Personally, I'd probably due that deal if Thorn and Kiki felt we HAD to have a player and thought he'd be taken at 8 or 9. We're basically giving up nothing, getting the first rounder we wanted, adding Banks who still has upside and adding a guy like Alexander Johnson (who I was a big fan of when he came into the league).
Would this deal ever happen, I highly doubt it.

-
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,945
- And1: 10,483
- Joined: Feb 02, 2007
-
If Thorn thinks one of Jordan, Love, Lopez, Randolph is clearly superior to the others and he is on the board then of course, its a no brainer to trade the 21, to move up three sports and to ensure he gets that player.
The cost of moving up three spots in the top 10, in this case a #21, is not unreasonable. It just depends on whether Thorn feels that strongly about any peculiar prospect. To me, if Love is on the board, I do the trade without hesitation.
The cost of moving up three spots in the top 10, in this case a #21, is not unreasonable. It just depends on whether Thorn feels that strongly about any peculiar prospect. To me, if Love is on the board, I do the trade without hesitation.