ImageImageImageImageImage

Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

CalamityX12
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 15,818
And1: 2,535
Joined: Mar 15, 2012
         

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1741 » by CalamityX12 » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:53 pm

can't wait to see who Marks draft.... i mean is there a prospect that HASN'T been covered yet by our committed fanbase?
The ModFather

My sports teams are currently experiencing suckiness. Please pardon the mess.
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,225
And1: 5,767
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1742 » by DarkXaero » Fri Jun 16, 2017 6:58 pm

Surprised at the lack of Jordan Bell buzz here. I think he's the closest thing to Draymond Green in this draft, at least defensively.
User avatar
shakendfries
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,886
And1: 1,063
Joined: Jun 24, 2015

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1743 » by shakendfries » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:38 pm

Read on Twitter


If the Nets pass on the opportunity to draft Patton for Giles, imma be so disappointed


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
ImageImage

"Kevin Durant is not coming to the Nets. If I'm wrong, I will change my avatar to anything you request no matter how humiliating it is." - MrDollarBills, 10/22/18
User avatar
NyCeEvO
Forum Mod - Nets
Forum Mod - Nets
Posts: 22,057
And1: 6,082
Joined: Jul 14, 2010

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1744 » by NyCeEvO » Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:57 pm

Rockice_24 wrote:OG just became a real possibility. Rumors out there he may miss most if not all of next season. This could be another Levert situation and if he's there we have to take him. He is everything you want in a PF. This would be the steal of the draft if we could land him.

We have to disconnect Levert and his success from the stories of others. First, the doctor who performed CLV's surgery is affiliated with the Nets. We had confidence that our guy had done the best possible job and he made a compelling case that CLV shouldn't have any further issues.

I can't find info on who performed OG's surgery but the fact that his projected recovery for an ACL has gone from what should've been 6-8 months to 12-16 months is a bit alarming. Recovery time for ACL tears has been decreasing over the years as the science and rehabbing techniques have improved. I'd really like to know why OG will be out for so long before entertaining the idea of selecting him. The reason why he's dropping is not because he's being slept on; it's because something might have gone wrong.
User avatar
shakendfries
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,886
And1: 1,063
Joined: Jun 24, 2015

Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1745 » by shakendfries » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:37 pm

For what it's worth

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


It wouldn't surprise me if the Celtics wind up with Okafor + Josh Jackson. Regardless, if the 76ers amass Fultz, Simmons, and Embiid this may wind up giving further credence to the Hinkie method, aka the gift that keeps on giving

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
ImageImage

"Kevin Durant is not coming to the Nets. If I'm wrong, I will change my avatar to anything you request no matter how humiliating it is." - MrDollarBills, 10/22/18
FlipFlopShot
Pro Prospect
Posts: 985
And1: 330
Joined: Jun 12, 2015
     

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1746 » by FlipFlopShot » Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:49 pm

shakendfries wrote:For what it's worth

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


It wouldn't surprise me if the Celtics wind up with Okafor + Josh Jackson. Regardless, if the 76ers amass Fultz, Simmons, and Embiid this may wind up giving further credence to the Hinkie method, aka the gift that keeps on giving

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


And in 4 years they all come to Brooklyn because of our respectable culture. We can all thank Hinkie for all these gifts.
ignisyon
Ballboy
Posts: 15
And1: 7
Joined: Jan 24, 2017
 

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1747 » by ignisyon » Fri Jun 16, 2017 10:37 pm

On Semi, he's been getting quite a few "Draymond" comparisons, but I just don't see it. Ojeleye looks like he could be a great defender, but didn't have the awareness and effort needed to be a real good defensive player/anchor. I think Draymond dropped in the draft because people were unsure of what his role would be in the NBA because his game and measurements were so weird. I like Ojeleye as a prospect, but I think he'll be more of a 3's and drives player and an ok small-ball 4.
User avatar
shakendfries
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,886
And1: 1,063
Joined: Jun 24, 2015

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1748 » by shakendfries » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:03 pm

FlipFlopShot wrote:
shakendfries wrote:For what it's worth

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


It wouldn't surprise me if the Celtics wind up with Okafor + Josh Jackson. Regardless, if the 76ers amass Fultz, Simmons, and Embiid this may wind up giving further credence to the Hinkie method, aka the gift that keeps on giving

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


And in 4 years they all come to Brooklyn because of our respectable culture. We can all thank Hinkie for all these gifts.


In all likelihood Ainge is making a bigger play & finna swoop Paul George from Magic + LeBron

And hopefully the Nets will have a respectable record in 4 years


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
ImageImage

"Kevin Durant is not coming to the Nets. If I'm wrong, I will change my avatar to anything you request no matter how humiliating it is." - MrDollarBills, 10/22/18
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 51,070
And1: 3,844
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1749 » by vincecarter4pres » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:09 pm

ignisyon wrote:On Semi, he's been getting quite a few "Draymond" comparisons, but I just don't see it. Ojeleye looks like he could be a great defender, but didn't have the awareness and effort needed to be a real good defensive player/anchor. I think Draymond dropped in the draft because people were unsure of what his role would be in the NBA because his game and measurements were so weird. I like Ojeleye as a prospect, but I think he'll be more of a 3's and drives player and an ok small-ball 4.

I also wouldn't doubt he had character concerns. He's a certifiable hothead, with techs galore, constant dirty play that would have made the dirtiest guys from the 80's blush, near fights and bar brawls under his belt. I don't even mind it, at least if he were on my team, though he's relatively unlikable when on another team, but I'm guessing there were reports coming into the draft that he was a little off and possible worry it would manifest into some sort of actual off court disaster.
Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,031
And1: 11,974
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1750 » by Paradise » Fri Jun 16, 2017 11:44 pm

This potential Boston-Philly blockbuster trade is exactly why it was absolutely silly to worry about the pick. Everyone was so 110% sure that Fultz would be wearing green. Now, he's likely headed to Philadelphia.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Marks tweak his plans a bit depending on what happens between now and Thursday.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
User avatar
MrDollarBills
RealGM
Posts: 77,434
And1: 54,290
Joined: Feb 15, 2008
       

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1751 » by MrDollarBills » Sat Jun 17, 2017 2:28 am

If Semi isn't the type to get into off court trouble I don't mind injecting some emotion into the mix as long as he is coachable and will do what he's asked from the staff.
Please consider donating blood: https://www.nybc.org/

2025-2026 Indiana Pacers

C: J. Valanciunas/C. Castleton
PF: K. Kuzma/J. Robinson-Earl
SF: T. Evbuomwan/J. Howard
SG: T. Hardaway Jr./C. Williams
PG: C. Payne/J. Springer
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,225
And1: 5,767
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1752 » by DarkXaero » Sat Jun 17, 2017 3:56 am

Paradise wrote:This potential Boston-Philly blockbuster trade is exactly why it was absolutely silly to worry about the pick. Everyone was so 110% sure that Fultz would be wearing green. Now, he's likely headed to Philadelphia.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Marks tweak his plans a bit depending on what happens between now and Thursday.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
That makes no sense, you're automatically assuming that Celtics would lose in that potential trade. It is being reported that Celtics might get the Lakers' unprotected 2018 pick in the trade, which could be extremely valuable, with that draft having Luka Doncic.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,031
And1: 11,974
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1753 » by Paradise » Sat Jun 17, 2017 4:21 am

DarkXaero wrote:
Paradise wrote:This potential Boston-Philly blockbuster trade is exactly why it was absolutely silly to worry about the pick. Everyone was so 110% sure that Fultz would be wearing green. Now, he's likely headed to Philadelphia.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Marks tweak his plans a bit depending on what happens between now and Thursday.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
That makes no sense, you're automatically assuming that Celtics would lose in that potential trade. It is being reported that Celtics might get the Lakers' unprotected 2018 pick in the trade, which could be extremely valuable, with that draft having Luka Doncic.


No. What I'm saying is that for a year everyone was scared of gifting to Boston is likely going elsewhere and will make the Philadelphia Sixers look like 2010 Thunder. My point is we can't build a team based off of what didn't happen yet. Now, we see that Philly is building a organic GS/OKC team and Boston is building a super team. Playing Lin more games and Brook more games going to change that? A lot of the arguments stemmed from fans wanting young guys benched in fear of a Top pick developing in Boston.

We may wake up on Friday to a division core of

BOS - IT / Jackson / George / Horford
PHI - Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid

Boston isn't going to lose the deal because it's virtually impossible for them to squander their assets since they have so many including FA options. We're looking at the pick maximizing TWO teams.

Philly will end up profiting from Billy King the way we expected Boston to benefit...Barring the deal going through and it sounds 95% done.

Yes, Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid is a better core than what Boston might do unless it's a Butler/Jackson/George crazy kind of deal.

Fultz, Simmons and Embiid are three franchise caliber players under 23.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
DarkXaero
RealGM
Posts: 14,225
And1: 5,767
Joined: Mar 25, 2011
   

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1754 » by DarkXaero » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:06 pm

Paradise wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:
Paradise wrote:This potential Boston-Philly blockbuster trade is exactly why it was absolutely silly to worry about the pick. Everyone was so 110% sure that Fultz would be wearing green. Now, he's likely headed to Philadelphia.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Marks tweak his plans a bit depending on what happens between now and Thursday.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
That makes no sense, you're automatically assuming that Celtics would lose in that potential trade. It is being reported that Celtics might get the Lakers' unprotected 2018 pick in the trade, which could be extremely valuable, with that draft having Luka Doncic.


No. What I'm saying is that for a year everyone was scared of gifting to Boston is likely going elsewhere and will make the Philadelphia Sixers look like 2010 Thunder. My point is we can't build a team based off of what didn't happen yet. Now, we see that Philly is building a organic GS/OKC team and Boston is building a super team. Playing Lin more games and Brook more games going to change that? A lot of the arguments stemmed from fans wanting young guys benched in fear of a Top pick developing in Boston.

We may wake up on Friday to a division core of

BOS - IT / Jackson / George / Horford
PHI - Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid

Boston isn't going to lose the deal because it's virtually impossible for them to squander their assets since they have so many including FA options. We're looking at the pick maximizing TWO teams.

Philly will end up profiting from Billy King the way we expected Boston to benefit...Barring the deal going through and it sounds 95% done.

Yes, Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid is a better core than what Boston might do unless it's a Butler/Jackson/George crazy kind of deal.

Fultz, Simmons and Embiid are three franchise caliber players under 23.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Fultz and Simmons have yet to play a single minute in the NBA and you're declaring them franchise caliber players already? :lol:

If Boston slides down to #3 to get the player they wanted all along (Josh Jackson) WHILE getting an unprotected 2018 pick from a lotto team (Lakers), it's a great deal for them. And it's only possible because we gifted them a #1 pick. No matter where that pick ends up, the truth remains that we basically lost a #1 pick for nothing and directly strengthened our division rivals in a huge way.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,031
And1: 11,974
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1755 » by Paradise » Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:46 pm

DarkXaero wrote:
Paradise wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:That makes no sense, you're automatically assuming that Celtics would lose in that potential trade. It is being reported that Celtics might get the Lakers' unprotected 2018 pick in the trade, which could be extremely valuable, with that draft having Luka Doncic.


No. What I'm saying is that for a year everyone was scared of gifting to Boston is likely going elsewhere and will make the Philadelphia Sixers look like 2010 Thunder. My point is we can't build a team based off of what didn't happen yet. Now, we see that Philly is building a organic GS/OKC team and Boston is building a super team. Playing Lin more games and Brook more games going to change that? A lot of the arguments stemmed from fans wanting young guys benched in fear of a Top pick developing in Boston.

We may wake up on Friday to a division core of

BOS - IT / Jackson / George / Horford
PHI - Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid

Boston isn't going to lose the deal because it's virtually impossible for them to squander their assets since they have so many including FA options. We're looking at the pick maximizing TWO teams.

Philly will end up profiting from Billy King the way we expected Boston to benefit...Barring the deal going through and it sounds 95% done.

Yes, Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid is a better core than what Boston might do unless it's a Butler/Jackson/George crazy kind of deal.

Fultz, Simmons and Embiid are three franchise caliber players under 23.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Fultz and Simmons have yet to play a single minute in the NBA and you're declaring them franchise caliber players already? :lol:

If Boston slides down to #3 to get the player they wanted all along (Josh Jackson) WHILE getting an unprotected 2018 pick from a lotto team (Lakers), it's a great deal for them. And it's only possible because we gifted them a #1 pick. No matter where that pick ends up, the truth remains that we basically lost a #1 pick for nothing and directly strengthened our division rivals in a huge way.

Fultz is a can't miss scoring prospect. Simmons was an all around can't miss prospect. I don't see what's so laughable about it. This is a general league consensus. Not even just fans.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1756 » by Prokorov » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:15 pm

Rockice_24 wrote:OG just became a real possibility. Rumors out there he may miss most if not all of next season. This could be another Levert situation and if he's there we have to take him. He is everything you want in a PF. This would be the steal of the draft if we could land him.


would love him but i dont think that will prevent him from going high in the draft
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1757 » by Prokorov » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:19 pm

shakendfries wrote:For what it's worth

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


It wouldn't surprise me if the Celtics wind up with Okafor + Josh Jackson. Regardless, if the 76ers amass Fultz, Simmons, and Embiid this may wind up giving further credence to the Hinkie method, aka the gift that keeps on giving

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums


i think it would do the opposite. it would mean thet half the guys the tanked for ended up leaving the team without much to show for iti.

MCW, Noel, Okafor would have netted them basically a couple second rounders and moving up 2 spots in the draft. Embiid could very well be headed down the greg oden path.
Prokorov
RealGM
Posts: 43,027
And1: 14,679
Joined: Dec 06, 2013

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1758 » by Prokorov » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:23 pm

Paradise wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:
Paradise wrote:
No. What I'm saying is that for a year everyone was scared of gifting to Boston is likely going elsewhere and will make the Philadelphia Sixers look like 2010 Thunder. My point is we can't build a team based off of what didn't happen yet. Now, we see that Philly is building a organic GS/OKC team and Boston is building a super team. Playing Lin more games and Brook more games going to change that? A lot of the arguments stemmed from fans wanting young guys benched in fear of a Top pick developing in Boston.

We may wake up on Friday to a division core of

BOS - IT / Jackson / George / Horford
PHI - Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid

Boston isn't going to lose the deal because it's virtually impossible for them to squander their assets since they have so many including FA options. We're looking at the pick maximizing TWO teams.

Philly will end up profiting from Billy King the way we expected Boston to benefit...Barring the deal going through and it sounds 95% done.

Yes, Fultz / Simmons / Saric / Embiid is a better core than what Boston might do unless it's a Butler/Jackson/George crazy kind of deal.

Fultz, Simmons and Embiid are three franchise caliber players under 23.



Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Fultz and Simmons have yet to play a single minute in the NBA and you're declaring them franchise caliber players already? :lol:

If Boston slides down to #3 to get the player they wanted all along (Josh Jackson) WHILE getting an unprotected 2018 pick from a lotto team (Lakers), it's a great deal for them. And it's only possible because we gifted them a #1 pick. No matter where that pick ends up, the truth remains that we basically lost a #1 pick for nothing and directly strengthened our division rivals in a huge way.

Fultz is a can't miss scoring prospect. Simmons was an all around can't miss prospect. I don't see what's so laughable about it. This is a general league consensus. Not even just fans.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


there is nothing cant miss about simmons. fultz as well. both could end up just being fringe borderline 1 way allstars.
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,031
And1: 11,974
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Re: Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1759 » by Paradise » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:25 pm

Read on Twitter


Even Colangelo knows what protection is.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Paradise
Nets Forum: Asst. To The RM
Posts: 39,031
And1: 11,974
Joined: Aug 16, 2012
Location: NYC
     

Brooklyn Nets 2017 Draft Thread 

Post#1760 » by Paradise » Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:33 pm

Prokorov wrote:
Paradise wrote:
DarkXaero wrote:Fultz and Simmons have yet to play a single minute in the NBA and you're declaring them franchise caliber players already? :lol:

If Boston slides down to #3 to get the player they wanted all along (Josh Jackson) WHILE getting an unprotected 2018 pick from a lotto team (Lakers), it's a great deal for them. And it's only possible because we gifted them a #1 pick. No matter where that pick ends up, the truth remains that we basically lost a #1 pick for nothing and directly strengthened our division rivals in a huge way.

Fultz is a can't miss scoring prospect. Simmons was an all around can't miss prospect. I don't see what's so laughable about it. This is a general league consensus. Not even just fans.




Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app


there is nothing cant miss about simmons. fultz as well. both could end up just being fringe borderline 1 way allstars.

Yeah, there's a lot of coulda woulda shoulda come draft time. So what? Kyrie was a 5 game sample prospect. John Wall could've been a fringe all star too. He had no jumper. That has nothing to do with the facts.

The kid is beasting in workouts and hasn't been reported to shown any major weaknesses against his peers. He's gotten endorsed by guys like T-Mac. Professionals get paid to scout and most of the league believes he's going to be a perennial scoring guard.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app

Return to Brooklyn Nets