PG: We survived 4-1
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,695
- And1: 19,191
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Wizards are 4-1? Wow that's new...
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,648
- And1: 95,429
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
aggo wrote:dont let the final 2 minutes fool you.
we outplayed them
better gameplan (all of our pnr coverages and blitzes)
our defensive rotations were on point
we were unnecessarily sloppy with the ball at times
minuses-
Randle needs to pass out of the double team faster
I think he needs to faceup the mismatch more than to just post.
Didn't watch this game live. I'll watch it at some point.
Randle, throughout his career, seems best attacking mismatches on the move/downhill. Can he do it from the post? Sure. But the best version of Randle seems to be attacking the mismatch outside in, driving it and scoring or passing from there.
Moving Randle >>> Stationary Randle

Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- omerome
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,571
- And1: 8,836
- Joined: Aug 22, 2004
- Location: Maryland (via Brooklyn)
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
F N 11 wrote:Idk who responsible for 10 straight ISO Randle down the stretch. Had 9 assist team had 7. Please let the guards be guards man.
Yeah, I hated those possessions. It's so robotic and it wasn't what gave us the lead. Those plays kill our movement.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
GONYK wrote:Mitch has been one of our most important players. No question.Dave DaButcher wrote:?s=21
And he’s exhibiting toughness, resilience and discipline. Mitch is a very important piece.
Mitch was awesome
Guys just go thud now. He is a legit stopper and game changer
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,952
- And1: 57,328
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Fournier 4-14 was pretty sketchy as well. He's streaky.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,222
- And1: 136,471
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
randle made a lot of good passes but he almost blew the game. hopefully he learns from this.
rj had his best game of the season on both ends. good schit
rj had his best game of the season on both ends. good schit

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 95,053
- And1: 67,797
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Burks in instead of Rose was mad questionable
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- X-Man Cometh
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,376
- And1: 1,281
- Joined: May 03, 2012
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
aggo
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,358
- And1: 8,481
- Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
thebuzzardman wrote:aggo wrote:dont let the final 2 minutes fool you.
we outplayed them
better gameplan (all of our pnr coverages and blitzes)
our defensive rotations were on point
we were unnecessarily sloppy with the ball at times
minuses-
Randle needs to pass out of the double team faster
I think he needs to faceup the mismatch more than to just post.
Didn't watch this game live. I'll watch it at some point.
Randle, throughout his career, seems best attacking mismatches on the move/downhill. Can he do it from the post? Sure. But the best version of Randle seems to be attacking the mismatch outside in, driving it and scoring or passing from there.
Moving Randle >>> Stationary Randle
I mean he got a lot of foul shots off the post. I think he got foul shots on every post up he tried. but I still want him to faceup more because hes shown that hes susceptible to holding onto the ball too long when the double comes. if hes facing up atleast he will see the court better than to be a sitting duck.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,648
- And1: 95,429
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
RHODEY wrote:HighRyzer83 wrote:Let's face it, it was a bunch of lucky bullshyt to get the bulls in that position. We controlled the whole game.
Well you make you own luck. They seemed to want it more. We are considerably more talented though. It was a road win versus a tough team. Ill take it. Ill say one thing..we are just skimming our full potential...
It's almost as if a team with two new starters is taking some time to gel...

Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- blueNorange
- Knicks Forum Contrarian
- Posts: 53,437
- And1: 21,151
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
- Location: mgmt: caa
Re: PG: We survived 4-1

LOL Y U MAD THO?

mitchell robinson has blocked zion williamson 3 times as of 7/6/19.

mitchell robinson has blocked zion williamson 3 times as of 7/6/19.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- NYKnickerbocker
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,848
- And1: 14,252
- Joined: Oct 10, 2012
- Location: Queens
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
We won that with two of our best offensive pieces misfiring
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
jvsimonetti0514
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,561
- And1: 9,787
- Joined: Dec 22, 2015
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
RJ and Kemba get the game balls and Evan and Randle need to walk home. Very bad
I'm apart of a Knicks podcast! You Should check it out!
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- damedash09
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,702
- And1: 1,538
- Joined: Feb 11, 2011
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
mpharris36 wrote:could u imagine if RJ missed those 2 FT's at the end...the board would have been so toxic!
Randle is getting crushed in this thread..as he should
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Grinditout
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,618
- And1: 2,752
- Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Randle ain't it, accept it and Put the ball in our guards' to close it out.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- KnicksGadfly
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,695
- And1: 19,191
- Joined: Jul 29, 2007
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Didn't play at our best and still beat Chicago...those fans must be salty as f now
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Riot Randolph
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,007
- And1: 9,582
- Joined: Nov 28, 2011
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Bulls fans salty...I ain't scared of the Knicks they played their best game and we still almost beat them,...lol no we didn't, we faltered in the last 3 minutes...but we're beating them by 10 pts all game
Formerly Knicks85
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- evevale
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,065
- And1: 18,520
- Joined: Dec 06, 2010
- Location: the internet
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Facts!!!!!!!!
Anyways…….
BING BONG!!!!!!!!!!!
ON THE ROAD TO 81-1!!!!!!!!!!
I swear you're the only poster on this board I want to hug and slap as hard as I physically can at the same time

Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- NYK Dolemite
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,506
- And1: 1,202
- Joined: Jul 10, 2010
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Iron Mantis wrote:
Yo this looks dope. What’s it from?
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,648
- And1: 95,429
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
robillionaire wrote:duetta wrote:It's an ugly win. Nothing to celebrate. We collapsed in the last 3 minutes.
No idea what Burks is doing out there. Randle has been great at times - but when teams apply the pressure...not good, not good at all.
I will celebrate every ugly win we get. Sometimes it ain't pretty. We got the W against a team that was undefeated in their building
Maybe some on here are too young, but the Riley\JVG era Knicks had a LOT of ugly wins that were close games. Actually, in retrospect, it felt like 90% of the wins.




















