thebuzzardman wrote:BeagleBoss wrote:Philly having a 10th pick is soooooo unfair!!!
Because their FO doesn't suck like the Knicks?
the front office that just got fired? Or the front office before that got fired?
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
thebuzzardman wrote:BeagleBoss wrote:Philly having a 10th pick is soooooo unfair!!!
Because their FO doesn't suck like the Knicks?

HarthorneWingo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Where is Gaines to save us? Just let him make the draft decisions
Fired
shtolky wrote:mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:what in the world ?
does that surprise you, teams trying to swindle the knicks.
They want our 2019 unprotected 1st.
With KP out for most of the year and MPjr injury history that woudl be a sure fire top pick with our luck.
There isn't a chance the 2019 pick (unprotected or not) would be on the table to move up a few slots. Hell Orlando moved up 2 spots from 12 to 10 and it only cost them a 2nd. I get the pessimism ha ha same old Knicks but there is no universe in which we have to give up the 2019 pick to move up to 6 or 5 from 9.
jvsimonetti0514 wrote:shtolky wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
does that surprise you, teams trying to swindle the knicks.
They want our 2019 unprotected 1st.
With KP out for most of the year and MPjr injury history that woudl be a sure fire top pick with our luck.
There isn't a chance the 2019 pick (unprotected or not) would be on the table to move up a few slots. Hell Orlando moved up 2 spots from 12 to 10 and it only cost them a 2nd. I get the pessimism ha ha same old Knicks but there is no universe in which we have to give up the 2019 pick to move up to 6 or 5 from 9.
Moving up in the late lottery is going to be cheaper than from mid lottery to top 5. Boston got another 1st for moving back to 3 last year.

GONYK wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Where is Gaines to save us? Just let him make the draft decisions
Fired
He's our VP of Player Personnel
HEZI wrote:Polk377 wrote:HEZI wrote:
The Jazz weren't even supposed to make the playoffs. Who predicted they would? After they lost Hayward they were looked at as a lotto team. You seriously trying to brush off an accomplishment like that by a rookie in the Western Conference when we can't even sniff the playoffs in the pathetic Eastern Conference?
You're acting like the Jazz are a stacked team. They got Mitchell, Gobert who is not an offensive player, and a bunch of role players. They didn't just sneak into the playoffs either, they were the 5th overall seed. Let me guess, you had them as the 5th seed before the season started and you also saw them advancing to the 2nd round?
Who cares about a green light? Porzingis has a green light too, as evidenced by his 18 shots a game.
You are overhyping him man. You really think he would have accomplished the same thing with the Knicks, Bulls, Hornets?
Man that's a flawed argument. That's like saying you really think Steph Curry would win 2 MVPs and 3 Championships on the Knicks. Who cares? You wanted to talk volume scoring and efficiency, let's not play fantasy world right now. Deal with things as is right now.
Polk377 wrote:HEZI wrote:Polk377 wrote:
You mean being placed on a playoff team with a solid foundation and getting the green light to shoot when he wants? Comparing the Jazz this year to the last 3 years of the Knicks is just stupid.
The Jazz weren't even supposed to make the playoffs. Who predicted they would? After they lost Hayward they were looked at as a lotto team. You seriously trying to brush off an accomplishment like that by a rookie in the Western Conference when we can't even sniff the playoffs in the pathetic Eastern Conference?
You're acting like the Jazz are a stacked team. They got Mitchell, Gobert who is not an offensive player, and a bunch of role players. They didn't just sneak into the playoffs either, they were the 5th overall seed. Let me guess, you had them as the 5th seed before the season started and you also saw them advancing to the 2nd round?
Who cares about a green light? Porzingis has a green light too, as evidenced by his 18 shots a game.
You are overhyping him man. You really think he would have accomplished the same thing with the Knicks, Bulls, Hornets?
GONYK wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Where is Gaines to save us? Just let him make the draft decisions
Fired
He's our VP of Player Personnel
Polk377 wrote:HEZI wrote:Polk377 wrote:
You are overhyping him man. You really think he would have accomplished the same thing with the Knicks, Bulls, Hornets?
Man that's a flawed argument. That's like saying you really think Steph Curry would win 2 MVPs and 3 Championships on the Knicks. Who cares? You wanted to talk volume scoring and efficiency, let's not play fantasy world right now. Deal with things as is right now.
You are the one living in the fantasy bubble. I'm done.
fatalogic wrote:Polk377 wrote:HEZI wrote:
The Jazz weren't even supposed to make the playoffs. Who predicted they would? After they lost Hayward they were looked at as a lotto team. You seriously trying to brush off an accomplishment like that by a rookie in the Western Conference when we can't even sniff the playoffs in the pathetic Eastern Conference?
You're acting like the Jazz are a stacked team. They got Mitchell, Gobert who is not an offensive player, and a bunch of role players. They didn't just sneak into the playoffs either, they were the 5th overall seed. Let me guess, you had them as the 5th seed before the season started and you also saw them advancing to the 2nd round?
Who cares about a green light? Porzingis has a green light too, as evidenced by his 18 shots a game.
You are overhyping him man. You really think he would have accomplished the same thing with the Knicks, Bulls, Hornets?
I don't think he is over hyping him but maybe undervaluing the development chops of the Jazz. Mitchell is probably better than Frank right now no matter where he went but I don't think he is a rookie of the year candidate if he was drafted by some of the dregs of the league.
HarthorneWingo wrote:2010 wrote:Nyk_Fatboy wrote:
Duke played zone its hard to gauge wendell on perimeter defense its very misleading because of the style of defense duke was in. Do i believe he can defend the perimeter? yes. it probably wont be amazing but i dont think he will be liability either dude is an intelligent player.
that does not look bad at all to me and i know its a small clip but its a small clip doing what they claim he cant do. and if he's playing next to KP who is a legit rim protector and WC can focus more on his man than worry about the rim like he had to at duke who says he's not a better perimeter defender than given credit for? Kp is a engaged defender, Carter is a engaged defender, ntilkina is a engaged defender. you plug in the 2 and 3 spot with the same mentality why cant it work? defense is team oriented last i checked.
He had to guard in space against a small St. John's team and got repeatedly torched (as did Bagley). He cannot guard in space. Go back and watch some tape of that game. Trust me.
How many centers can really guard PGs/wings out past the 3 point line? It defies physics

WajaBawl wrote:
Not even sure if they're asking about Frank tbh. He's so raw right now that I can't see other teams drooling over him. Most likely they're asking for another 1st, which in that case, they can walk themselves out.

god shammgod wrote:please stop including timmy in trades that have him as a positive

2010 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:2010 wrote:
He had to guard in space against a small St. John's team and got repeatedly torched (as did Bagley). He cannot guard in space. Go back and watch some tape of that game. Trust me.
How many centers can really guard PGs/wings out past the 3 point line? It defies physics
That doesn't mean we should continue to stock up on those who can't.

god shammgod wrote:please stop including timmy in trades that have him as a positive
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor

camillepd wrote:Questionable back issue Porter is not the player to give up future picks to move up for. Doncic, yes. Otherwise, stay at 9 and draft BPA.
camillepd wrote:Questionable back issue Porter is not the player to give up future picks to move up for. Doncic, yes. Otherwise, stay at 9 and draft BPA.