ImageImageImageImageImage

Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
AmazingJason
RealGM
Posts: 15,179
And1: 6,142
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#121 » by AmazingJason » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:23 am

Mike Breen wrote:No. There's no market for Derrick Rose. Just wait until the offseason


I could see Sacramento doing it.

Why? Just because.
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES

El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO

PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
User avatar
j4remi
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 38,271
And1: 20,265
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
         

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#122 » by j4remi » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:25 am

Of course you don't rule it out, but the team better look like a championship contender if you're gonna bring him back. Otherwise figure out how much it'd cost to convince Milos Teodosic to come over for a couple of years before he's too old for the nba. It'll probably be half the price or less.
PG- Haliburton | Schroder | Sasser
SG- Grimes | Dick | Bogdanovic
SF- Bridges | George
PF- Hunter |Strus| Fleming
C- Turner | Powell | Wiseman
Adelheid
RealGM
Posts: 11,746
And1: 7,965
Joined: Jul 10, 2014
 

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#123 » by Adelheid » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:27 am

Max amount is 75m/3yr if the Knicks go to the extension route.
If resigned through FA with bird rights...it will be much more and longer as well.
User avatar
AmazingJason
RealGM
Posts: 15,179
And1: 6,142
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#124 » by AmazingJason » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:47 am

Adelheid wrote:Max amount is 75m/3yr if the Knicks go to the extension route.
If resigned through FA with bird rights...it will be much more and longer as well.


75M :nonono: :nonono: :nonono:

More and longer? :curse: :curse: :curse:

Knickstape ended up being right about Rose. Not just right, but like really, really, really right. Goddamn YouTube videos f*cking tricked me; those misleading pieces of sh*t need to get taken off the site. He scored 30 points last night and helped to keep us in the game...but I was cringing the entire time he was doing it.
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES

El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO

PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
User avatar
N Y K
RealGM
Posts: 15,076
And1: 8,517
Joined: Jan 18, 2015
       

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#125 » by N Y K » Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:04 am

just suck enough to get a promising PG this draft
User avatar
AmazingJason
RealGM
Posts: 15,179
And1: 6,142
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#126 » by AmazingJason » Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:13 am

k r i s t a p s wrote:just suck enough to get a promising PG this draft


Keep playing Noah

Play Lance big minutes upon return

Team implodes

Riot in the locker room

Draft Fultz, Jackson or Smith


That's one way it can go down :wink:
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES

El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO

PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,788
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#127 » by dakomish23 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:22 am

E-Balla wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
E-Balla wrote:They matched up but remember Chicago could only sign Wade because they traded Jose with 2 2nds to the Lakers. Noah was only signed because we didn't have a C in this situation we couldn't have signed Lee but Wade would've been open to come here. Remember there were reports that he was thinking of NY when signing.

That dream scenario is what I had in mind though. Maybe even starting Ennings. We wouldn't have Holiday and Lee but I remember when reports first started coming out about Wade not signing in Miami they said his top choices were NY, Denver, and Chicago. If we had RoLo already it could've been an easy signing.


that's a lot of monday morning quarterbacking.

so we were to just know that miami and d-wade wasn't going to work out...

then, sit on the same team during the offseason and hope wade wanted to sign, under that crazy circumstance deep into free agency that no one really knew was going to happen until it did?

and then... when wade signs with chicago anyway... we trot out the exact same team as before with no significant changes?

maybe a maxed-out unworthy SG?

1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.

2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.


I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.

Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo

Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.

What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#128 » by seren » Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:26 am

There seems to be a lot of unnecessary reaction to this. Why should we rule out anything this early in the season?
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,831
And1: 25,128
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#129 » by E-Balla » Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:33 am

AmazingJason wrote:
k r i s t a p s wrote:just suck enough to get a promising PG this draft


Keep playing Noah

Play Lance big minutes upon return

Team implodes

Riot in the locker room

Draft Fultz, Jackson or Smith


That's one way it can go down :wink:

Jackson over Fox, Monk, and Ball? Nah.
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,604
And1: 30,807
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#130 » by Jeff Van Gully » Wed Nov 30, 2016 4:46 am

dakomish23 wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
Jeff Van Gully wrote:
that's a lot of monday morning quarterbacking.

so we were to just know that miami and d-wade wasn't going to work out...

then, sit on the same team during the offseason and hope wade wanted to sign, under that crazy circumstance deep into free agency that no one really knew was going to happen until it did?

and then... when wade signs with chicago anyway... we trot out the exact same team as before with no significant changes?

maybe a maxed-out unworthy SG?

1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.

2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.


I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.

Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo

Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.

What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.


it's the assuredness that wade would have come to NY at all that is troubling. and again, that miami situation fell apart late. wade kind of fell into chicago's lap after it became clear there was trouble in wade county. that's when chicago dealt calderon to the lakers to open up some space. wade wasn't even a target until pat the rat surprisingly quibbled over the change and wade left on principle (rightly so).

if pat didn't front on the money, wade would have been as done a deal as we all expected him to be. a non-target and non-issue. that levee broke after we were already out of the game. now, had wade actually been realistically on the market, rose or no rose, the knicks could have made a pass before signing lee and noah. and i can imagine they would have. lee would not have been necessary and noah could have taken the pocket change or kicked rocks.

all that said, lee is actually going to play out his deal and it is a great one for the production he offers. i'm good with it. if there's anything to be concerned with, it's signing noah in the first place. but, i like noah and i'm not mad at his deal... yet.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 21,596
And1: 20,765
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#131 » by Wolfgang630 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:40 am

Jesus...I don't even want them to contemplate on resigning this undersized 2 guard...he's not a **** PG. Let him walk.
whocares1
RealGM
Posts: 10,125
And1: 6,264
Joined: Oct 31, 2014
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#132 » by whocares1 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:50 am

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
E-Balla wrote:1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.

2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.


I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.

Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo

Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.

What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.


it's the assuredness that wade would have come to NY at all that is troubling. and again, that miami situation fell apart late. wade kind of fell into chicago's lap after it became clear there was trouble in wade county. that's when chicago dealt calderon to the lakers to open up some space. wade wasn't even a target until pat the rat surprisingly quibbled over the change and wade left on principle (rightly so).

if pat didn't front on the money, wade would have been as done a deal as we all expected him to be. a non-target and non-issue. that levee broke after we were already out of the game. now, had wade actually been realistically on the market, rose or no rose, the knicks could have made a pass before signing lee and noah. and i can imagine they would have. lee would not have been necessary and noah could have taken the pocket change or kicked rocks.

all that said, lee is actually going to play out his deal and it is a great one for the production he offers. i'm good with it. if there's anything to be concerned with, it's signing noah in the first place. but, i like noah and i'm not mad at his deal... yet.


Dwyane Wade could have absolutely been had, but once Lopez was traded it was never going to happen. The plan initially was still to play the triangle, and the triangle excels with a post big that can pass the ball. Lopez' only issue was that he wasn't an adequate passer and missed Porzingis a lot of times that he was right next to him.

Lopez became expendable which made way to Rose which made way to Noah. I was one of the few that wanted Dwyane Wade even for the max if we needed to because Wade, a proven recruiter, would have been able to entice CP3 to join the team. Phil wanted to make the triangle work and thus we're stuck with Noah and Lance.
User avatar
dakomish23
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 58,788
And1: 48,762
Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Location: Empire State
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extention later in the season 

Post#133 » by dakomish23 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:51 am

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:
E-Balla wrote:1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.

2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.


I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.

Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo

Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.

What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.


it's the assuredness that wade would have come to NY at all that is troubling. and again, that miami situation fell apart late. wade kind of fell into chicago's lap after it became clear there was trouble in wade county. that's when chicago dealt calderon to the lakers to open up some space. wade wasn't even a target until pat the rat surprisingly quibbled over the change and wade left on principle (rightly so).

if pat didn't front on the money, wade would have been as done a deal as we all expected him to be. a non-target and non-issue. that levee broke after we were already out of the game. now, had wade actually been realistically on the market, rose or no rose, the knicks could have made a pass before signing lee and noah. and i can imagine they would have. lee would not have been necessary and noah could have taken the pocket change or kicked rocks.

all that said, lee is actually going to play out his deal and it is a great one for the production he offers. i'm good with it. if there's anything to be concerned with, it's signing noah in the first place. but, i like noah and i'm not mad at his deal... yet.


I was just following down the road of the possibility. I'm not assured of anything.

I got zero problems with Lee. He's been solid. But Wade is a guy who's game I could see fitting well with our big guns.

Doesn't matter now it's over. Let's see if this team can finally figure out how hard they have to play every night on both ends to earn W's. There's talent for sure.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor


#FreeJimmit
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 11,322
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#134 » by taikibansei » Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:54 am

It's still a bit early--and he's playing much better than expected (even trying on defense)--but I would lean toward NOT keeping him around. Or, if we did, I'd want it to be at a much lower annual salary. Rose can still put up big individual numbers on occasion, but he's no longer a game-changer on his own...and just doesn't have the consistency as a play-maker that we need going forward.

I've stolen the following sequence from a posting to the General Board. It pretty much sums up my current feelings on the Rose extension idea:

Porzingis: "Nice screen Noah, I'm completely open for a corner 3 one of the most efficient shots in basketball, I just need Derrick to pass me the ball."
Image

Porzingis: "I see Derrick cannot see me, so I will extend my right arm."

Image

Porzingis: "Perhaps I am not visible to Derrick yet, I will extend both arms now."
Image

Porzingis: "Noah has locked down my man for a long time now, I better hold both arms straight up because I don't know how much longer Noah can hold my defender."
Image

Lee: "Derrick, Russell has stopped guarding me and I can also shoot 3s. I'm right here."

Image

Rose: "Turnaround hanging contested fadeaway jumper...exactly the play I wanted."

Image
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
WherezDa90sNIX
Sophomore
Posts: 105
And1: 40
Joined: Nov 28, 2016
       

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#135 » by WherezDa90sNIX » Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:08 am

Why the hell are we talking about extending anyone in November while we are currently under .500 again?
Swarles Xavier
Senior
Posts: 724
And1: 248
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#136 » by Swarles Xavier » Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:33 am

taikibansei wrote:It's still a bit early--and he's playing much better than expected (even trying on defense)--but I would lean toward NOT keeping him around. Or, if we did, I'd want it to be at a much lower annual salary. Rose can still put up big individual numbers on occasion, but he's no longer a game-changer on his own...and just doesn't have the consistency as a play-maker that we need going forward.

I've stolen the following sequence from a posting to the General Board. It pretty much sums up my current feelings on the Rose extension idea:

Porzingis: "Nice screen Noah, I'm completely open for a corner 3 one of the most efficient shots in basketball, I just need Derrick to pass me the ball."
Image

Porzingis: "I see Derrick cannot see me, so I will extend my right arm."

Image

Porzingis: "Perhaps I am not visible to Derrick yet, I will extend both arms now."
Image

Porzingis: "Noah has locked down my man for a long time now, I better hold both arms straight up because I don't know how much longer Noah can hold my defender."
Image

Lee: "Derrick, Russell has stopped guarding me and I can also shoot 3s. I'm right here."

Image

Rose: "Turnaround hanging contested fadeaway jumper...exactly the play I wanted."

Image

I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 11,322
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#137 » by taikibansei » Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:44 am

Swarles Xavier wrote:I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.


He has Lee open too, with an easier passing angle. That said...that third frame is a wide-open pass to KP, which Rose would have seen if he'd looked up. (Fourth frame too.)

I like these slides because they show a tendency I've seen in Rose. He decides way too early (for a point guard) whether to shoot or to pass. And when he decides he's going to shoot, that's it. The head goes down, the eyes glaze over--he'll keep feinting and dribbling until he gets that shot off. He rarely changes his mind.

As others have noted, he's really probably better now as a shooting guard/scorer than as a point guard. If we do keep him, it should be with this limitation in mind.
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,749
And1: 110,929
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#138 » by Capn'O » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:10 am

j4remi wrote:Of course you don't rule it out, but the team better look like a championship contender if you're gonna bring him back. Otherwise figure out how much it'd cost to convince Milos Teodosic to come over for a couple of years before he's too old for the nba. It'll probably be half the price or less.


Excuse me? Did somebody say Teodosic might come over?

Image
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION - PLEASE INQUIRE WITHIN

:beer:
Swarles Xavier
Senior
Posts: 724
And1: 248
Joined: Jul 08, 2014

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#139 » by Swarles Xavier » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

taikibansei wrote:
Swarles Xavier wrote:I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.


He has Lee open too, with an easier passing angle. That said...that third frame is a wide-open pass to KP, which he would have seen if he'd looked up.

I like these slides because they show a tendency I've seen in Rose. He decides way too early (for a point guard) whether to shoot or to pass. And when he decides he's going to shoot, that's it. The head goes down, the eyes glaze over--he'll keep feinting and dribbling until he gets that shot off. He rarely changes his mind.

As others have noted, he's really probably better now as a shooting guard/scorer than as a point guard.

Lee is not open, Westbrook was between them the whole time. If Westbrook committed on the double team Lee would have been open. Westbrook only looked away from Lee when Rose started the act of shooting. For Porzingis even on that third frame I don't see the passing angle. Is Rose supposed to throw a parabola pass over the head of the big men that would go back down to Porzings? The available pass would have been where the referee is, if Porzingis relocated maybe he could have gotten the ball. As I said there are better examples.

I agree on Rose making up his mind way too early but I disagree that he would be better as an sg. He is a horrible off-ball player. He can't shoot and he does not cut. Spacing will get worse as his man will leave him in the three point line. He set decent screens to free up the others, but that's such a waste. There's no other way to utilize his ability to penetrate than him having the ball most of the time. He's a pg for better or worse.
User avatar
Sark
RealGM
Posts: 19,274
And1: 16,051
Joined: Sep 21, 2010
Location: Merry Pills
 

Re: Knicks not ruling out DRose extension later in the season 

Post#140 » by Sark » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:20 am

Swarles Xavier wrote:
taikibansei wrote:It's still a bit early--and he's playing much better than expected (even trying on defense)--but I would lean toward NOT keeping him around. Or, if we did, I'd want it to be at a much lower annual salary. Rose can still put up big individual numbers on occasion, but he's no longer a game-changer on his own...and just doesn't have the consistency as a play-maker that we need going forward.

I've stolen the following sequence from a posting to the General Board. It pretty much sums up my current feelings on the Rose extension idea:

Porzingis: "Nice screen Noah, I'm completely open for a corner 3 one of the most efficient shots in basketball, I just need Derrick to pass me the ball."
Image

Porzingis: "I see Derrick cannot see me, so I will extend my right arm."

Image

Porzingis: "Perhaps I am not visible to Derrick yet, I will extend both arms now."
Image

Porzingis: "Noah has locked down my man for a long time now, I better hold both arms straight up because I don't know how much longer Noah can hold my defender."
Image

Lee: "Derrick, Russell has stopped guarding me and I can also shoot 3s. I'm right here."

Image

Rose: "Turnaround hanging contested fadeaway jumper...exactly the play I wanted."

Image

I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.



By the third photo, there is an easy pass to make to the corner.

Passes to the corner for the 3 are pretty common in the NBA these days. It's not an impossible pass to make.

Return to New York Knicks