Mike Breen wrote:No. There's no market for Derrick Rose. Just wait until the offseason
I could see Sacramento doing it.
Why? Just because.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Mike Breen wrote:No. There's no market for Derrick Rose. Just wait until the offseason

Adelheid wrote:Max amount is 75m/3yr if the Knicks go to the extension route.
If resigned through FA with bird rights...it will be much more and longer as well.
k r i s t a p s wrote:just suck enough to get a promising PG this draft

E-Balla wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:E-Balla wrote:They matched up but remember Chicago could only sign Wade because they traded Jose with 2 2nds to the Lakers. Noah was only signed because we didn't have a C in this situation we couldn't have signed Lee but Wade would've been open to come here. Remember there were reports that he was thinking of NY when signing.
That dream scenario is what I had in mind though. Maybe even starting Ennings. We wouldn't have Holiday and Lee but I remember when reports first started coming out about Wade not signing in Miami they said his top choices were NY, Denver, and Chicago. If we had RoLo already it could've been an easy signing.
that's a lot of monday morning quarterbacking.
so we were to just know that miami and d-wade wasn't going to work out...
then, sit on the same team during the offseason and hope wade wanted to sign, under that crazy circumstance deep into free agency that no one really knew was going to happen until it did?
and then... when wade signs with chicago anyway... we trot out the exact same team as before with no significant changes?
maybe a maxed-out unworthy SG?
1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.
2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
AmazingJason wrote:k r i s t a p s wrote:just suck enough to get a promising PG this draft
Keep playing Noah
Play Lance big minutes upon return
Team implodes
Riot in the locker room
Draft Fultz, Jackson or Smith
That's one way it can go down

dakomish23 wrote:E-Balla wrote:Jeff Van Gully wrote:
that's a lot of monday morning quarterbacking.
so we were to just know that miami and d-wade wasn't going to work out...
then, sit on the same team during the offseason and hope wade wanted to sign, under that crazy circumstance deep into free agency that no one really knew was going to happen until it did?
and then... when wade signs with chicago anyway... we trot out the exact same team as before with no significant changes?
maybe a maxed-out unworthy SG?
1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.
2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.
I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.
Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo
Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.
What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.
Jeff Van Gully wrote:dakomish23 wrote:E-Balla wrote:1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.
2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.
I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.
Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo
Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.
What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.
it's the assuredness that wade would have come to NY at all that is troubling. and again, that miami situation fell apart late. wade kind of fell into chicago's lap after it became clear there was trouble in wade county. that's when chicago dealt calderon to the lakers to open up some space. wade wasn't even a target until pat the rat surprisingly quibbled over the change and wade left on principle (rightly so).
if pat didn't front on the money, wade would have been as done a deal as we all expected him to be. a non-target and non-issue. that levee broke after we were already out of the game. now, had wade actually been realistically on the market, rose or no rose, the knicks could have made a pass before signing lee and noah. and i can imagine they would have. lee would not have been necessary and noah could have taken the pocket change or kicked rocks.
all that said, lee is actually going to play out his deal and it is a great one for the production he offers. i'm good with it. if there's anything to be concerned with, it's signing noah in the first place. but, i like noah and i'm not mad at his deal... yet.

Jeff Van Gully wrote:dakomish23 wrote:E-Balla wrote:1. Chicago couldn't sign Wade with Rose on the books. They had to trade Jose to fit him.
2. Yeah this is in hindsight. What's not hindsight? Noah and Rose were terrible acquisitions and we gave up a B+ deal to get 2 scrubs that made us worse and destroyed flexibility. Flexibility that could've had us in the running for Wade.
I don't think they're scrubs in any way, but I was preaching this team should just roll that **** over till 2017. Part of that plan could of been giving Wade a big 1 year deal with the 30 mil in space and maybe signing Jennings.
Jennings Wade Melo KP RoLo
Probably better than this team, though I'm not giving up on this squad and praying each piece figures out what we need from them to be successful.
What's done is done. Don't dig a deeper grave. That's all I can ask for at this point.
it's the assuredness that wade would have come to NY at all that is troubling. and again, that miami situation fell apart late. wade kind of fell into chicago's lap after it became clear there was trouble in wade county. that's when chicago dealt calderon to the lakers to open up some space. wade wasn't even a target until pat the rat surprisingly quibbled over the change and wade left on principle (rightly so).
if pat didn't front on the money, wade would have been as done a deal as we all expected him to be. a non-target and non-issue. that levee broke after we were already out of the game. now, had wade actually been realistically on the market, rose or no rose, the knicks could have made a pass before signing lee and noah. and i can imagine they would have. lee would not have been necessary and noah could have taken the pocket change or kicked rocks.
all that said, lee is actually going to play out his deal and it is a great one for the production he offers. i'm good with it. if there's anything to be concerned with, it's signing noah in the first place. but, i like noah and i'm not mad at his deal... yet.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor






taikibansei wrote:It's still a bit early--and he's playing much better than expected (even trying on defense)--but I would lean toward NOT keeping him around. Or, if we did, I'd want it to be at a much lower annual salary. Rose can still put up big individual numbers on occasion, but he's no longer a game-changer on his own...and just doesn't have the consistency as a play-maker that we need going forward.
I've stolen the following sequence from a posting to the General Board. It pretty much sums up my current feelings on the Rose extension idea:
Porzingis: "Nice screen Noah, I'm completely open for a corner 3 one of the most efficient shots in basketball, I just need Derrick to pass me the ball."
Porzingis: "I see Derrick cannot see me, so I will extend my right arm."
Porzingis: "Perhaps I am not visible to Derrick yet, I will extend both arms now."
Porzingis: "Noah has locked down my man for a long time now, I better hold both arms straight up because I don't know how much longer Noah can hold my defender."
Lee: "Derrick, Russell has stopped guarding me and I can also shoot 3s. I'm right here."
Rose: "Turnaround hanging contested fadeaway jumper...exactly the play I wanted."
Swarles Xavier wrote:I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.

j4remi wrote:Of course you don't rule it out, but the team better look like a championship contender if you're gonna bring him back. Otherwise figure out how much it'd cost to convince Milos Teodosic to come over for a couple of years before he's too old for the nba. It'll probably be half the price or less.

taikibansei wrote:Swarles Xavier wrote:I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.
He has Lee open too, with an easier passing angle. That said...that third frame is a wide-open pass to KP, which he would have seen if he'd looked up.
I like these slides because they show a tendency I've seen in Rose. He decides way too early (for a point guard) whether to shoot or to pass. And when he decides he's going to shoot, that's it. The head goes down, the eyes glaze over--he'll keep feinting and dribbling until he gets that shot off. He rarely changes his mind.
As others have noted, he's really probably better now as a shooting guard/scorer than as a point guard.
Swarles Xavier wrote:taikibansei wrote:It's still a bit early--and he's playing much better than expected (even trying on defense)--but I would lean toward NOT keeping him around. Or, if we did, I'd want it to be at a much lower annual salary. Rose can still put up big individual numbers on occasion, but he's no longer a game-changer on his own...and just doesn't have the consistency as a play-maker that we need going forward.
I've stolen the following sequence from a posting to the General Board. It pretty much sums up my current feelings on the Rose extension idea:
Porzingis: "Nice screen Noah, I'm completely open for a corner 3 one of the most efficient shots in basketball, I just need Derrick to pass me the ball."
Porzingis: "I see Derrick cannot see me, so I will extend my right arm."
Porzingis: "Perhaps I am not visible to Derrick yet, I will extend both arms now."
Porzingis: "Noah has locked down my man for a long time now, I better hold both arms straight up because I don't know how much longer Noah can hold my defender."
Lee: "Derrick, Russell has stopped guarding me and I can also shoot 3s. I'm right here."
Rose: "Turnaround hanging contested fadeaway jumper...exactly the play I wanted."
I don't know much but it looks like passing to Porzingis in that situation is what you would call a dangerous pass. There are 3 okc players between them. There's no double team so you can bet that the defenders are looking at the passing lanes. There are better examples of Rose's lack of court vision.