Greenie wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:blanko wrote:We are gonna offer our lottery pick/2 dallas picks/dsj/ knox/zo and even one of our picks for AD.
Sent from my SM-N960N using Tapatalk
Maybe. Who knows. I hope not. AD is great. It's not remotely "Melo all over again". But the way it's similar is gutting depth. Trading away good young players and a pick of ours, plus 2 picks for depth - in effect, 6 or 7 cost controlled players for one guy.
Yup. I hope not.
Not even. Both Chandler and Gallo needed to be paid. Neither were cost controlled anymore.
Frank
Knox
Dotson
Trier
Picks
For
Davis
Mitch
Davis
Kawhi
Brogdon
Smith
I get all that. You assume they'll be money left over for Brogdan. Well, I guess if Durant doesn't sign, which "might" be the key to any FA signings at all - we don't know. Since it's all speculation, that's ok. Also, wouldn't the Pels want DSJr in the deal? They already have "highest possible ceiling ever Frank" in JRue.
Dotson doesn't count for anything. There's 50 guys like him all over NBA. I guess for salary matching purposes. I like him. I like players that defend and shoot. Good teams usually have several. Knox, Trier and some picks would have value for the Pels though. How many? I'd assume the minimum is the Knick's first and both of the Mavs. But could be another Knicks pick.
Also, to the point about Gallo and Chandler, the Knicks were soon to be capped out after adding Melo to Stat; I guess it took Chandler (the C) to finish it off, but the team lacked flexibility of assets moving forward.
That would be a concern after any trade for AD. Not that losing Knox or Frank or even DSJr instead of Frank would be the end of the world after - the NBA is mostly about the quality of the starters/ immediate bench, and the team would have that, but the drop off would come quick, in effect the Knicks traded away 3 straight years of 1st round picks, and assuming they retain their picks other than the 2019, that'd be some stuff to use to make moves that fill out the team moving forward, but still feels just a bit light.
I like the concept. Feels like the Knicks are sort of a year or two early to really do it right. Take Philly. Sure, a most extreme example of "doing it right' but added Butler. Then added Harris. Still was able to make other deals, added a pick back IN.
They built the team up before that and STILL had the flexibility and assets to make TWO major deals. And then added in a pick after.