ImageImageImageImageImage

2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2

Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks

User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,497
And1: 136,858
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1481 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:06 pm

knickstape4ever wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:To say Orlando never tanked is not true at all.

2012-2013: 20-62
2013-2014: 23-59
2014-2015: 25-47
2016-2017: 29-53
2017-2018: 25-57

You guys say tanking is supposed to be all about getting young stars long term but now you're using a new narrative saying that you use tanking to trade players for stars. Pick a side, you all over the place :lol: . And the only player who was a top 5 pick on Toronto was JV. So they didn't really "tank", instead they actually did what the Knicks have been doing, which is getting the 8th and 9th pick. They actually hit on their picks unlike us. So you're still wrong about Toronto. Also notice how you ignored Miami, cause you know damn well they didn't tank to get to the finals. :lol:

Lavine will be a free agent next year. Why not just wait for him? Bulls are worse with Vucevic's defense so Lavine will want out of there. We can even trade for him if necessary. I am pretty sure another star player will want out as well. It happens every year.




How am I all over the place, when you don't even want to acknowledge that the Magic made the playoff, so isn't the tanking a success there? They traded an MVP caliber player in 2011, they weren't "tanking" they were just flat out bad, they only had the worst record once in that time period and drafted Oladipo. However they drafted Isaac and Gordon in those years too, who helped them get to the playoffs which seems to be the do or die goal this year. Gordon and Isaac were the 4th and 6th picks, if you say the Raptors didn't tank then neither did the Magic. That is the point, the players who actually got them to the playoffs and back to irrelevancy were the guys they drafted from 2014 on. The fact they made the playoffs before us, and you forgot that they did shows how completely irrelevant it is to do it in the East :lol:

How am I wrong about Toronto? They had years of lottery picks that helped them build an asset base. Who wants any of our young players outside of IQ and RJ? We're not even doing what those teams did, our lottery picks are rotting on the bench while the vets play. Why would I mention the Heat? They aren't going to win the title, and most importantly, go look at their minutes distribution last year, then look at ours and tell me if you notice a difference. I'll save you the trip, their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th players with the most minutes were 2nd year guys and under 25. Derrick Jones played more for them than IQ plays for us.


Time to let go of the LaVine dream, if that's our only hope we may as well just get ready for the eventual 2024-2028 draft now, cause if we don't sign him there's nothing else out there, and if we do sign him we still need a number 1 :lol: You can't sell me on a guy being a 1 while they're 9 games under .500 in the East.


getting Lavine isn't happening. Bulls aren't trading him, like the Knicks aren't trading Randle

Chicago is gonna get better. Vuc helps them and w/ their current lottery odds, there's a chance they could even land a top 4 pick which would give them a brighter future than the Knicks

even if the Bulls aren't good and signs point to Lavine wanting out, they'll likely trade him before the deadline next year in that scenario. he'd still become a FA, but any team trading for him would have to feel confident in re-signing him

Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
knickstape4ever
Head Coach
Posts: 7,082
And1: 7,166
Joined: Jul 09, 2014
   

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1482 » by knickstape4ever » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:09 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:To say Orlando never tanked is not true at all.

2012-2013: 20-62
2013-2014: 23-59
2014-2015: 25-47
2016-2017: 29-53
2017-2018: 25-57

You guys say tanking is supposed to be all about getting young stars long term but now you're using a new narrative saying that you use tanking to trade players for stars. Pick a side, you all over the place :lol: . And the only player who was a top 5 pick on Toronto was JV. So they didn't really "tank", instead they actually did what the Knicks have been doing, which is getting the 8th and 9th pick. They actually hit on their picks unlike us. So you're still wrong about Toronto. Also notice how you ignored Miami, cause you know damn well they didn't tank to get to the finals. :lol:

Lavine will be a free agent next year. Why not just wait for him? Bulls are worse with Vucevic's defense so Lavine will want out of there. We can even trade for him if necessary. I am pretty sure another star player will want out as well. It happens every year.




How am I all over the place, when you don't even want to acknowledge that the Magic made the playoff, so isn't the tanking a success there? They traded an MVP caliber player in 2011, they weren't "tanking" they were just flat out bad, they only had the worst record once in that time period and drafted Oladipo. However they drafted Isaac and Gordon in those years too, who helped them get to the playoffs which seems to be the do or die goal this year. Gordon and Isaac were the 4th and 6th picks, if you say the Raptors didn't tank then neither did the Magic. That is the point, the players who actually got them to the playoffs and back to irrelevancy were the guys they drafted from 2014 on. The fact they made the playoffs before us, and you forgot that they did shows how completely irrelevant it is to do it in the East :lol:

How am I wrong about Toronto? They had years of lottery picks that helped them build an asset base. Who wants any of our young players outside of IQ and RJ? We're not even doing what those teams did, our lottery picks are rotting on the bench while the vets play. Why would I mention the Heat? They aren't going to win the title, and most importantly, go look at their minutes distribution last year, then look at ours and tell me if you notice a difference. I'll save you the trip, their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th players with the most minutes were 2nd year guys and under 25. Derrick Jones played more for them than IQ plays for us.


Time to let go of the LaVine dream, if that's our only hope we may as well just get ready for the eventual 2024-2028 draft now, cause if we don't sign him there's nothing else out there, and if we do sign him we still need a number 1 :lol: You can't sell me on a guy being a 1 while they're 9 games under .500 in the East.

I just gave you 5 seasons of Orlando tanking. I am not ignoring their playoff appearances. In fact, their 5 years of tanking has only resulted in 2 first round exits. So you actually just made my argument even stronger. Tanking is not always successful.

Again you are all all over the place. You said you did not mention the Heat because they aren't going to win a championship, yet you are praising Orlando for reaching the playoffs with Aaron Gordon and Isaac because they tanked for them. Bruh, Im done :lol:
When you are ready to pick a side in your argument and be consistent then we can talk about tanking.

And you're still wrong about Toronto. Cause they picked Derozan 9th, Ross, 8th. Isn't that where we've been picking the last couple of years? Blame the Knicks for drafting Frank, Knox, Obi over the likes of SGA, Bam, Donovan Mitchell, Haliburton, etc. That's where your frustration should really be at. A top 5 pick isn't the only way to draft high end talent.

It's not a stretch to say Lavine can reach another level under Thibs. We saw Randle do it, and Lavine is getting better every year just like Randle. They're both extremely hard workers which bodes well with Thibs.


I think the point NoDope is trying to make is that we are eerily close to becoming the Magic. a team that might make it to the playoffs a couple times, get bounced quickly in the 1st round and end up back in the lottery

they were never able to land a #1 option and we don't have one either. which is why, if we want one, it makes more sense to get one thru the draft rather than be a perennial 7/8 seed

side note: one of the reasons also for the Magic's "tank" not working is that they made a very bad trade: Dipo and Sabonis for Ibaka. had they held onto those players, they'd be better rn
Image
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,497
And1: 136,858
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1483 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:15 pm

knickstape4ever wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


How am I all over the place, when you don't even want to acknowledge that the Magic made the playoff, so isn't the tanking a success there? They traded an MVP caliber player in 2011, they weren't "tanking" they were just flat out bad, they only had the worst record once in that time period and drafted Oladipo. However they drafted Isaac and Gordon in those years too, who helped them get to the playoffs which seems to be the do or die goal this year. Gordon and Isaac were the 4th and 6th picks, if you say the Raptors didn't tank then neither did the Magic. That is the point, the players who actually got them to the playoffs and back to irrelevancy were the guys they drafted from 2014 on. The fact they made the playoffs before us, and you forgot that they did shows how completely irrelevant it is to do it in the East :lol:

How am I wrong about Toronto? They had years of lottery picks that helped them build an asset base. Who wants any of our young players outside of IQ and RJ? We're not even doing what those teams did, our lottery picks are rotting on the bench while the vets play. Why would I mention the Heat? They aren't going to win the title, and most importantly, go look at their minutes distribution last year, then look at ours and tell me if you notice a difference. I'll save you the trip, their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th players with the most minutes were 2nd year guys and under 25. Derrick Jones played more for them than IQ plays for us.


Time to let go of the LaVine dream, if that's our only hope we may as well just get ready for the eventual 2024-2028 draft now, cause if we don't sign him there's nothing else out there, and if we do sign him we still need a number 1 :lol: You can't sell me on a guy being a 1 while they're 9 games under .500 in the East.

I just gave you 5 seasons of Orlando tanking. I am not ignoring their playoff appearances. In fact, their 5 years of tanking has only resulted in 2 first round exits. So you actually just made my argument even stronger. Tanking is not always successful.

Again you are all all over the place. You said you did not mention the Heat because they aren't going to win a championship, yet you are praising Orlando for reaching the playoffs with Aaron Gordon and Isaac because they tanked for them. Bruh, Im done :lol:
When you are ready to pick a side in your argument and be consistent then we can talk about tanking.

And you're still wrong about Toronto. Cause they picked Derozan 9th, Ross, 8th. Isn't that where we've been picking the last couple of years? Blame the Knicks for drafting Frank, Knox, Obi over the likes of SGA, Bam, Donovan Mitchell, Haliburton, etc. That's where your frustration should really be at. A top 5 pick isn't the only way to draft high end talent.

It's not a stretch to say Lavine can reach another level under Thibs. We saw Randle do it, and Lavine is getting better every year just like Randle. They're both extremely hard workers which bodes well with Thibs.


I think the point NoDope is trying to make is that we are eerily close to becoming the Magic. a team that might make it to the playoffs a couple times, get bounced quickly in the 1st round and end up back in the lottery

they were never able to land a #1 option and we don't have one either. which is why, if we want one, it makes more sense to get one thru the draft rather than be a perennial 7/8 seed

side note: one of the reasons also for the Magic's "tank" not working is that they made a very bad trade: Dipo and Sabonis for Ibaka. had they held onto those players, they'd be better rn

5 years of tanking and they couldn't find a #1 option in the draft. Just shows you how tanking isn't always successful.

The only realistic way to tank is by firing Thibs and replacing him with a garbage coach like Fizdale
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
knickstape4ever
Head Coach
Posts: 7,082
And1: 7,166
Joined: Jul 09, 2014
   

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1484 » by knickstape4ever » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:16 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


How am I all over the place, when you don't even want to acknowledge that the Magic made the playoff, so isn't the tanking a success there? They traded an MVP caliber player in 2011, they weren't "tanking" they were just flat out bad, they only had the worst record once in that time period and drafted Oladipo. However they drafted Isaac and Gordon in those years too, who helped them get to the playoffs which seems to be the do or die goal this year. Gordon and Isaac were the 4th and 6th picks, if you say the Raptors didn't tank then neither did the Magic. That is the point, the players who actually got them to the playoffs and back to irrelevancy were the guys they drafted from 2014 on. The fact they made the playoffs before us, and you forgot that they did shows how completely irrelevant it is to do it in the East :lol:

How am I wrong about Toronto? They had years of lottery picks that helped them build an asset base. Who wants any of our young players outside of IQ and RJ? We're not even doing what those teams did, our lottery picks are rotting on the bench while the vets play. Why would I mention the Heat? They aren't going to win the title, and most importantly, go look at their minutes distribution last year, then look at ours and tell me if you notice a difference. I'll save you the trip, their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th players with the most minutes were 2nd year guys and under 25. Derrick Jones played more for them than IQ plays for us.


Time to let go of the LaVine dream, if that's our only hope we may as well just get ready for the eventual 2024-2028 draft now, cause if we don't sign him there's nothing else out there, and if we do sign him we still need a number 1 :lol: You can't sell me on a guy being a 1 while they're 9 games under .500 in the East.


getting Lavine isn't happening. Bulls aren't trading him, like the Knicks aren't trading Randle

Chicago is gonna get better. Vuc helps them and w/ their current lottery odds, there's a chance they could even land a top 4 pick which would give them a brighter future than the Knicks

even if the Bulls aren't good and signs point to Lavine wanting out, they'll likely trade him before the deadline next year in that scenario. he'd still become a FA, but any team trading for him would have to feel confident in re-signing him

Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent


I mean it takes time to adjust to having new teammates

+ 2 of the losses were to the Jazz and Suns, who have the 2 best records in the NBA. the other 2 were against the Warriors and Spurs, so not bad teams either

Maybe Randle will ask out too if we start losing games? Bulls will probably wind up within 2 games of the Knicks final record (they have an easier SOS) and will have better lottery odds than the Knicks, giving them a chance at a top 4 pick. So what reason would Lavine want out? I don't think anyone expected them to be a playoff team this yr, they are gonna get better, and they have a solid HC. also Chicago is a desirable market
Image
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 95,497
And1: 136,858
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1485 » by 3toheadmelo » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:26 pm

knickstape4ever wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
getting Lavine isn't happening. Bulls aren't trading him, like the Knicks aren't trading Randle

Chicago is gonna get better. Vuc helps them and w/ their current lottery odds, there's a chance they could even land a top 4 pick which would give them a brighter future than the Knicks

even if the Bulls aren't good and signs point to Lavine wanting out, they'll likely trade him before the deadline next year in that scenario. he'd still become a FA, but any team trading for him would have to feel confident in re-signing him

Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent


I mean it takes time to adjust to having new teammates

+ 2 of the losses were to the Jazz and Suns, who have the 2 best records in the NBA. the other 2 were against the Warriors and Spurs, so not bad teams either

Maybe Randle will ask out too if we start losing games? Bulls will probably wind up within 2 games of the Knicks final record (they have an easier SOS) and will have better lottery odds than the Knicks, giving them a chance at a top 4 pick. So what reason would Lavine want out? I don't think anyone expected them to be a playoff team this yr, they are gonna get better, and they have a solid HC. also Chicago is a desirable market

Lavine might want out because he's been on that team for 4 years and they haven't made the playoffs due to the lack of talent around him, horrible coaching, and a bad front office. So far their new front office and coach hasn't changed much. Bulls has been trying to get into the playoffs the last 2 years. I follow them a bit cause of BAF. Lavine has repeatedly said he wants to be on a winning team.

Randle has only been here 2 years and in his second year the Knicks have made a big turn around. He even wrote a letter to us Knicks fans like last month saying he wants to be here long term. I can't see him wanting out.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
knickstape4ever
Head Coach
Posts: 7,082
And1: 7,166
Joined: Jul 09, 2014
   

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1486 » by knickstape4ever » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:46 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent


I mean it takes time to adjust to having new teammates

+ 2 of the losses were to the Jazz and Suns, who have the 2 best records in the NBA. the other 2 were against the Warriors and Spurs, so not bad teams either

Maybe Randle will ask out too if we start losing games? Bulls will probably wind up within 2 games of the Knicks final record (they have an easier SOS) and will have better lottery odds than the Knicks, giving them a chance at a top 4 pick. So what reason would Lavine want out? I don't think anyone expected them to be a playoff team this yr, they are gonna get better, and they have a solid HC. also Chicago is a desirable market

Lavine might want out because he's been on that team for 4 years and they haven't made the playoffs due to the lack of talent around him, horrible coaching, and a bad front office. So far their new front office and coach hasn't changed much. Bulls has been trying to get into the playoffs the last 2 years. I follow them a bit cause of BAF. Lavine has repeatedly said he wants to be on a winning team.

Randle has only been here 2 years and in his second year the Knicks have made a big turn around. He even wrote a letter to us Knicks fans like last month saying he wants to be here long term. I can't see him wanting out.


Billy Donovan is an upgrade over Boylen. the change in winning %, reflects it, not to mention Donovan's track record (both pro's and college)

the Bulls FO is TBD. yes, the Vuc deal was kinda a head-scratcher, but it also makes sense. they're showing Lavine that they're committed to improving now. and what did they really give up? Wendell Carter (who I really like, but maybe change of scenery was necessary, already playing better with ORL), and 2 1sts (protected), and Otto Porter Jr.

not a bad deal when you consider that the 2021 1st is top 4 protected. worst case scenario, Bulls miss playoffs, pick ends up being 7-9 and that goes to the Magic. Bulls are betting that Vuc provided more value/winning than the 8th pick over the next few years.....a safe bet IMO

but since that pick is top 4 protected, Bulls still have a shot at landing a franchise-changing talent to pair w/ Lavine, Vuc and Williams (who looks like a nice young player already)

yeah, I don't think Randle wants out either, I'm just using it as a comp b/c the Bulls aren't far behind the Knicks
Image
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,181
And1: 56,370
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1487 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sun Apr 4, 2021 10:54 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:To say Orlando never tanked is not true at all.

2012-2013: 20-62
2013-2014: 23-59
2014-2015: 25-47
2016-2017: 29-53
2017-2018: 25-57

You guys say tanking is supposed to be all about getting young stars long term but now you're using a new narrative saying that you use tanking to trade players for stars. Pick a side, you all over the place :lol: . And the only player who was a top 5 pick on Toronto was JV. So they didn't really "tank", instead they actually did what the Knicks have been doing, which is getting the 8th and 9th pick. They actually hit on their picks unlike us. So you're still wrong about Toronto. Also notice how you ignored Miami, cause you know damn well they didn't tank to get to the finals. :lol:

Lavine will be a free agent next year. Why not just wait for him? Bulls are worse with Vucevic's defense so Lavine will want out of there. We can even trade for him if necessary. I am pretty sure another star player will want out as well. It happens every year.




How am I all over the place, when you don't even want to acknowledge that the Magic made the playoff, so isn't the tanking a success there? They traded an MVP caliber player in 2011, they weren't "tanking" they were just flat out bad, they only had the worst record once in that time period and drafted Oladipo. However they drafted Isaac and Gordon in those years too, who helped them get to the playoffs which seems to be the do or die goal this year. Gordon and Isaac were the 4th and 6th picks, if you say the Raptors didn't tank then neither did the Magic. That is the point, the players who actually got them to the playoffs and back to irrelevancy were the guys they drafted from 2014 on. The fact they made the playoffs before us, and you forgot that they did shows how completely irrelevant it is to do it in the East :lol:

How am I wrong about Toronto? They had years of lottery picks that helped them build an asset base. Who wants any of our young players outside of IQ and RJ? We're not even doing what those teams did, our lottery picks are rotting on the bench while the vets play. Why would I mention the Heat? They aren't going to win the title, and most importantly, go look at their minutes distribution last year, then look at ours and tell me if you notice a difference. I'll save you the trip, their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th players with the most minutes were 2nd year guys and under 25. Derrick Jones played more for them than IQ plays for us.


Time to let go of the LaVine dream, if that's our only hope we may as well just get ready for the eventual 2024-2028 draft now, cause if we don't sign him there's nothing else out there, and if we do sign him we still need a number 1 :lol: You can't sell me on a guy being a 1 while they're 9 games under .500 in the East.

I just gave you 5 seasons of Orlando tanking. I am not ignoring their playoff appearances. In fact, their 5 years of tanking has only resulted in 2 first round exits. So you actually just made my argument even stronger. Tanking is not always successful.

Again you are all all over the place. You said you did not mention the Heat because they aren't going to win a championship, yet you are praising Orlando for reaching the playoffs with Aaron Gordon and Isaac because they tanked for them. Bruh, Im done :lol:
When you are ready to pick a side in your argument and be consistent then we can talk about tanking.

And you're still wrong about Toronto. Cause they picked Derozan 9th, Ross, 8th. Isn't that where we've been picking the last couple of years? Blame the Knicks for drafting Frank, Knox, Obi over the likes of SGA, Bam, Donovan Mitchell, Haliburton, etc. That's where your frustration should really be at. A top 5 pick isn't the only way to draft high end talent.

It's not a stretch to say Lavine can reach another level under Thibs. We saw Randle do it, and Lavine is getting better every year just like Randle. They're both extremely hard workers which bodes well with Thibs.



5 seasons with zero context whatsoever, and they weren't flat out tanking which is why they only had the worst record once. Adding context is pointing out they had the 5th worst record in 2017 and 2018, or that they were 35-47 in 2015-2016 which is why you left out that year. I don't understand your angle on this one, we haven't made the playoffs and have been losing longer than them, the only two years we committed to being a bottom 3 team are the two years we ended up with two actual all-star level talents. The Magic lost a MVP runner up, and bounced back quicker than we did, they also decided to trade off Oladipo in the middle too and bounced back from that, so did the tank work or not? You want us to make the playoffs, so how are you trying to spin 2 first round exists as a bad thing if you also want us to be a first round exit this year, that is the measure of our growth right, getting to the playoffs for the right to get bodied.

Where am I praising the Magic? I said we're on the path to being like them, which is exactly what I want to avoid. They never drafted a top tier talent and decided to go ahead with their push to be competitive, which is what we're doing. I brought up the Magic because they made the playoffs the last 2 seasons, nobody cares that they did it, and they're no better for doing it. They were at a crossroads with Vucevic, drafted a center and then he has a career year, makes the all-star team, they make the playoffs and lock him up in the offseason, how can you not see the similarities? They should be a cautionary tale. The Raptors developed those players, they created value by playing and developing Ross and DeRozan, outside of RJ nobody on this team under 25 is playing big minutes.

And what if we don't get LaVine, then what? We're back to hoping that we can land a free agent that may never come? What's the pivot if LaVine decides to take the extra year, or the Bulls start winning. You can't say the Vucevic trade has failed so soon too, it's been 5 games, judge them after 20 at least. The best way to get talent is the draft, whether it's drafting that player or building up trade assets to trade for that player.
User avatar
TheGreenArrow
RealGM
Posts: 27,609
And1: 43,112
Joined: Sep 13, 2017

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1488 » by TheGreenArrow » Sun Apr 4, 2021 11:35 pm

knickstape4ever wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
but you wanna mortgage it all for Towns?

Towns hasn't been a winning player. In college, Towns played great defense, but now it seems like he uses all his energy on offense and doesn't care much on defense

if Thibs couldn't get him to play defense in Minnesota, how will he here? Thibs' literally has us as a top 5 defense which is pretty incredible


Everything you just said about towns we said about Randle last year.

It’s not about thibs, it’s about putting towns under the guidance of Kenny Payne(who he had at ku) and johnnie Bryant.

That’s the game changer!!!!!


Maybe Kenny Payne makes a difference, maybe not. But we do know that Towns/Thibs didn't work out well

yes, same was said about Randle, but we every Kentucky player that comes here isn't gonna up their game just b/c of Payne. Knox didn't. Maybe Randle's success is self-driven. you need to be motivated to play defense, and Randle is. I haven't seen that from Towns, even under Thibs

also, Johnnie Bryant probably doesn't work w/ the bigs much, so not sure he'd really have an impact on Towns


Read on Twitter


We’d be getting a more mature towns.

He’s ready for a thibs like coach/approach!!!!
NewYorkOrNoWhere!!!!!!!!!!!!
NewKnicks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,762
And1: 756
Joined: Feb 03, 2021

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1489 » by NewKnicks » Sun Apr 4, 2021 11:41 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


How am I all over the place, when you don't even want to acknowledge that the Magic made the playoff, so isn't the tanking a success there? They traded an MVP caliber player in 2011, they weren't "tanking" they were just flat out bad, they only had the worst record once in that time period and drafted Oladipo. However they drafted Isaac and Gordon in those years too, who helped them get to the playoffs which seems to be the do or die goal this year. Gordon and Isaac were the 4th and 6th picks, if you say the Raptors didn't tank then neither did the Magic. That is the point, the players who actually got them to the playoffs and back to irrelevancy were the guys they drafted from 2014 on. The fact they made the playoffs before us, and you forgot that they did shows how completely irrelevant it is to do it in the East :lol:

How am I wrong about Toronto? They had years of lottery picks that helped them build an asset base. Who wants any of our young players outside of IQ and RJ? We're not even doing what those teams did, our lottery picks are rotting on the bench while the vets play. Why would I mention the Heat? They aren't going to win the title, and most importantly, go look at their minutes distribution last year, then look at ours and tell me if you notice a difference. I'll save you the trip, their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th players with the most minutes were 2nd year guys and under 25. Derrick Jones played more for them than IQ plays for us.


Time to let go of the LaVine dream, if that's our only hope we may as well just get ready for the eventual 2024-2028 draft now, cause if we don't sign him there's nothing else out there, and if we do sign him we still need a number 1 :lol: You can't sell me on a guy being a 1 while they're 9 games under .500 in the East.


getting Lavine isn't happening. Bulls aren't trading him, like the Knicks aren't trading Randle

Chicago is gonna get better. Vuc helps them and w/ their current lottery odds, there's a chance they could even land a top 4 pick which would give them a brighter future than the Knicks

even if the Bulls aren't good and signs point to Lavine wanting out, they'll likely trade him before the deadline next year in that scenario. he'd still become a FA, but any team trading for him would have to feel confident in re-signing him

Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent


I can't believe you're still still thinking Lavine is leaving the Bulls. There is zero chance the Bulls let him go, and he's said he's extremely happy with the organization especially after signing Vuc. They traded two 1sts to get Vuc. There not letting Lavine go. Also, I'm sure the team had extensive talks with Lavine before they pulled the trigger on a deal for a 30 year old. I'm sure Lavine said yeah, let's go for it, I want to stay here and build a winner with Vuc on my team. They don't make that deal without getting Lavine's opinion.

Also, do you look at schedules/teams played when saying a team isn't good? Bulls played the Spurs, Warriors, Suns, Jazz and the Nets. Do you consider that it might take time for teams to gel after major trades? Or no, you're able to see the next 5 years based on 5 games?

I'm not saying the Bulls are going to be great, but you don't have any clue what the future holds for them after adding Vuc. I don't either. Let's see how they play the next 10 games when their schedule is not as tough as the last 6 games, and they've had a little time to gel.

I respect your opinions Melo, but making predictions on the future of the Bulls based on 5 games seems a bit premature. Don't you think?
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,804
And1: 95,626
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1490 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Apr 5, 2021 12:06 am

NewKnicks wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
getting Lavine isn't happening. Bulls aren't trading him, like the Knicks aren't trading Randle

Chicago is gonna get better. Vuc helps them and w/ their current lottery odds, there's a chance they could even land a top 4 pick which would give them a brighter future than the Knicks

even if the Bulls aren't good and signs point to Lavine wanting out, they'll likely trade him before the deadline next year in that scenario. he'd still become a FA, but any team trading for him would have to feel confident in re-signing him

Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent


I can't believe you're still still thinking Lavine is leaving the Bulls. There is zero chance the Bulls let him go, and he's said he's extremely happy with the organization especially after signing Vuc. They traded two 1sts to get Vuc. There not letting Lavine go. Also, I'm sure the team had extensive talks with Lavine before they pulled the trigger on a deal for a 30 year old. I'm sure Lavine said yeah, let's go for it, I want to stay here and build a winner with Vuc on my team. They don't make that deal without getting Lavine's opinion.

Also, do you look at schedules/teams played when saying a team isn't good? Bulls played the Spurs, Warriors, Suns, Jazz and the Nets. Do you consider that it might take time for teams to gel after major trades? Or no, you're able to see the next 5 years based on 5 games?

I'm not saying the Bulls are going to be great, but you don't have any clue what the future holds for them after adding Vuc. I don't either. Let's see how they play the next 10 games when their schedule is not as tough as the last 6 games, and they've had a little time to gel.

I respect your opinions Melo, but making predictions on the future of the Bulls based on 5 games seems a bit premature. Don't you think?


Well, you are being just as assured he won't leave as Melo is he will.
It's a coin toss of opinion at that point.

Either way, both of you are speculating. There are solid reasons he might leave and solid reasons he might stay.

Knicks have extra picks and cap space and cost controlled players, at least for another year.
Those are their team building advantages. Oh, and having a good coach.
And that like 4 of their cost controlled players are good.

What is working against them?
No good FA's this upcoming season - or not elite.
The picks are in the mid 1st-ish.
Dolan

Well, I'm paraphrasing. More to it than that. Knicks can do some good things, but they'll have to thread the needle some, get their timing right and have some skill/luck in the draft and some luck in maybe a name player "complaining a trade"
Image
Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,852
And1: 9,505
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1491 » by Zenzibar » Mon Apr 5, 2021 12:30 am

newyorker4ever wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
newyorker4ever wrote:
Nobody is crying because they're showing progress, it's that the progress they're showing isn't enough progress that they'll be winning anything but making the playoffs in the very weak east and in doing that it's hurting the chance at rebuilding quicker and hurting the chances of getting players in the draft that could actually make this team show real progress of becoming something special with some of these players that they'll miss out on in the top of the draft.


But in order to show progress is to take steps. The Team will not go from a bottom dweller to the ECFs in one year. A player like Zack is not going from the Bulls to the Bulls 2.0, however, will be intrigued if we're competitive.

As I said before, our best bet is to make the play-in, get the experience but lose and still be in the lottery.


If the draft wasn't as strong with star type talent in the top 5 then i'd agree but it is so IMO our best bet would of been to get in that top 5 and be able to add one of those top 5 (J.Suggs) to this team.



My Guy. the draft lottery Gods have not been kind to the Knicks in a loooonnnnngg time. If you, I would not place a big bet in us drafting our position or moving up.
Stop All Genocides
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,396
And1: 110,344
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1492 » by Capn'O » Mon Apr 5, 2021 12:59 am

3toheadmelo wrote:Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic.


:uhoh:
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,852
And1: 9,505
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1493 » by Zenzibar » Mon Apr 5, 2021 1:05 am

TheGreenArrow wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
TheGreenArrow wrote:
Everything you just said about towns we said about Randle last year.

It’s not about thibs, it’s about putting towns under the guidance of Kenny Payne(who he had at ku) and johnnie Bryant.

That’s the game changer!!!!!


Maybe Kenny Payne makes a difference, maybe not. But we do know that Towns/Thibs didn't work out well

yes, same was said about Randle, but we every Kentucky player that comes here isn't gonna up their game just b/c of Payne. Knox didn't. Maybe Randle's success is self-driven. you need to be motivated to play defense, and Randle is. I haven't seen that from Towns, even under Thibs

also, Johnnie Bryant probably doesn't work w/ the bigs much, so not sure he'd really have an impact on Towns


Read on Twitter


We’d be getting a more mature towns.

He’s ready for a thibs like coach/approach!!!!


Towns has 3 more years on his contract and he would have to do a Harden in order to force a trade to NY.

Minny however is in a tricky situation. If they land a top 2 pick, will they draft ANOTHER point guard or trade out? They already have D'Angelo, Malik and Edwards. They need a power forward to compliment Towns but this draft is top heavy with points guards, shooting guards and wings which they have a plethora of.


.
Stop All Genocides
Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,852
And1: 9,505
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1494 » by Zenzibar » Mon Apr 5, 2021 1:16 am

Gravy wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Gravy wrote:Its no sure thing that all the top 5 players in the draft will be better than Randle and all those teams will be contenders overnight.

Will this year have no busts?




Not a single team drafting in the top 5 would trade their pick for Randle.

True, not right now but lets see what those players are in 3 years.



You were right the first time. After the top 3, a Randle trade would require #4 or 5 and them some.
Stop All Genocides
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,181
And1: 56,370
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1495 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Mon Apr 5, 2021 1:40 am

Zenzibar wrote:
Gravy wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:


Not a single team drafting in the top 5 would trade their pick for Randle.

True, not right now but lets see what those players are in 3 years.



You were right the first time. After the top 3, a Randle trade would require #4 or 5 and them some.



Image
Richard4444
RealGM
Posts: 10,410
And1: 7,203
Joined: Dec 28, 2018
Location: São Paulo, Brasil
   

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1496 » by Richard4444 » Mon Apr 5, 2021 4:53 am

NewKnicks wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
knickstape4ever wrote:
getting Lavine isn't happening. Bulls aren't trading him, like the Knicks aren't trading Randle

Chicago is gonna get better. Vuc helps them and w/ their current lottery odds, there's a chance they could even land a top 4 pick which would give them a brighter future than the Knicks

even if the Bulls aren't good and signs point to Lavine wanting out, they'll likely trade him before the deadline next year in that scenario. he'd still become a FA, but any team trading for him would have to feel confident in re-signing him

Bulls are 1-4 with Vucevic. His defense made them even worse. It's not a stretch to say Lavine will ask out. We can trade for him or sign him as a free agent


I can't believe you're still still thinking Lavine is leaving the Bulls. There is zero chance the Bulls let him go, and he's said he's extremely happy with the organization especially after signing Vuc. They traded two 1sts to get Vuc. There not letting Lavine go. Also, I'm sure the team had extensive talks with Lavine before they pulled the trigger on a deal for a 30 year old. I'm sure Lavine said yeah, let's go for it, I want to stay here and build a winner with Vuc on my team. They don't make that deal without getting Lavine's opinion.

Also, do you look at schedules/teams played when saying a team isn't good? Bulls played the Spurs, Warriors, Suns, Jazz and the Nets. Do you consider that it might take time for teams to gel after major trades? Or no, you're able to see the next 5 years based on 5 games?

I'm not saying the Bulls are going to be great, but you don't have any clue what the future holds for them after adding Vuc. I don't either. Let's see how they play the next 10 games when their schedule is not as tough as the last 6 games, and they've had a little time to gel.

I respect your opinions Melo, but making predictions on the future of the Bulls based on 5 games seems a bit premature. Don't you think?


I will be surprised if Lavine re-signs with the Bulls unless the Bulls significantly improves next season.

Bulls is a mid-market team that hardly attracts FAs and does not have a lot of talent. Coby and PatWill can be great but it will take time.

Now they have a 30,5 years old star who soon will start to decline and 2 FRPs less. And he doesn't solve at all the defense issues of the team if he will not make them worse.
BAF Brooklyn - Pre-Season NBA 2K Simulation 2023 Champions.

Brunson/Nembhard/Micic
IQ/Strus/Ben Sheppard
Butler/Nesmith/Watford
Batum/Boucher/Morris/
Embiid/Plumlee/Landale/
Zenzibar
General Manager
Posts: 8,852
And1: 9,505
Joined: Jan 10, 2019
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1497 » by Zenzibar » Mon Apr 5, 2021 1:07 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:
Gravy wrote:True, not right now but lets see what those players are in 3 years.



You were right the first time. After the top 3, a Randle trade would require #4 or 5 and them some.



Image


Me: I'll value a young 26 year old All-Star.

You: believe a 19 year old hyped by the same draft "gurus" who also said Obi Toppin was a ready to step-in prospect.

Image
Stop All Genocides
Juco24
Head Coach
Posts: 6,226
And1: 5,811
Joined: Feb 12, 2013

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1498 » by Juco24 » Mon Apr 5, 2021 3:08 pm

I'm sure it's been discussed but what's the scouting report on Chris Duarte? I watched him a little and from where we're seemingly going to pick - he doesn't seem like a bad option. Thoughts?
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,804
And1: 95,626
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1499 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Apr 5, 2021 3:17 pm

Juco24 wrote:I'm sure it's been discussed but what's the scouting report on Chris Duarte? I watched him a little and from where we're seemingly going to pick - he doesn't seem like a bad option. Thoughts?


He won SG of the year, so I think we should pass.

https://www.registerguard.com/story/sports/college/basketball/2021/04/03/oregon-ducks-senior-chris-duarte-wins-jerry-west-shooting-guard-year-award/7077241002/

After all, Obi won PF of the year and we've seen how that turned out. :D
Image
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,181
And1: 56,370
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: 2020-2021 College/Draft Thread 2 

Post#1500 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Mon Apr 5, 2021 4:45 pm

Zenzibar wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Zenzibar wrote:

You were right the first time. After the top 3, a Randle trade would require #4 or 5 and them some.



Image


Me: I'll value a young 26 year old All-Star.

You: believe a 19 year old hyped by the same draft "gurus" who also said Obi Toppin was a ready to step-in prospect.

Image



Just cause you overvalue him doesn't mean that's reality :lol:. In reality no GM is going to call up the Knicks about Randle offering a top 5 pick, not because the price is high, it's because the pick is worth more. He's only that valuable to delusional fans who don't read the room and see how the NBA works.

Return to New York Knicks