PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- Chanel Bomber
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,902
- And1: 42,013
- Joined: Sep 20, 2018
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is supposedly "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker. He sucks.
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is supposedly "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker. He sucks.
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 94,925
- And1: 67,662
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Wharton Alum 08 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Net rating after three games:
Kemba: -9.2
Fournier: +8.0
Kemba is killing us.
What is Rose's net rating?
Highest on the team at +27.4
He was #1 last year as well at +10.6
Yet Thibs took him out after the 15-0 run because of what? Thibs has a deeper team and still have no feel for rotation. Rose on fire we kept going to Randle. IQ, Burks, and RJ didn’t have it and Grimes couldn’t even see a minute when we needed an actual shooter and defender.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,272
- And1: 94,924
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.

Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- Wharton Alum 08
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,814
- And1: 335
- Joined: Apr 02, 2009
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is supposedly "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
Why not Kemba in that role right now?
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 94,925
- And1: 67,662
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Did Randle blame himself post game yet? He always does this after going back to his old self.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,702
- And1: 56,994
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
I hate to tell you this but rose isn't an actual starting pg either, I know he's been really good for us but he's a backup, and I'm sure there were reasons that plenty of teams have felt they were better off without him as well, including the cavs, pistons, timberwolves, and knicks in 2017
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- Monk1718
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,642
- And1: 19,841
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
3toheadmelo wrote:Monk1718 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Might be time to have that talk about RJ.
Cadillac Ntilikina is still a Ntilikina.
!!!!!!!!!!!
gonna need you to morph frank into rj

Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- GONYK
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 66,872
- And1: 45,481
- Joined: Jun 27, 2003
- Location: Brunson Gang
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is supposedly "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker.
I don't really see the benefit of that. Either way, the minute distribution is the same.
I also don't think a competent two-way PG is easy to get, backup or otherwise.
Kemba is just here to soak up non-Rose mins
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- robillionaire
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,702
- And1: 56,994
- Joined: Jul 12, 2015
- Location: Asheville
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
thebuzzardman wrote:Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
hotter take than that: i doubt anybody wants him
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,272
- And1: 94,924
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
hotter take than that: i doubt anybody wants him
Well, we could always package Obi with him.
Oh wait.

Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- Monk1718
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,642
- And1: 19,841
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
hotter take than that: i doubt anybody wants him
Jesus
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 94,925
- And1: 67,662
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Somebody in the game thread said RJ just need an opportunity as if he’s James Harden on OKC.
Both Tom and Thibs blaming this on effort. That’s horse chit, can’t believe we were feeling ourself and couldn’t punch back.
Breaking: Spike Lee gave Cole Anthony moms the court side seats, thanks Spike… thanks to you 29 16 and 8. Spike stay costing us.
Both Tom and Thibs blaming this on effort. That’s horse chit, can’t believe we were feeling ourself and couldn’t punch back.
Breaking: Spike Lee gave Cole Anthony moms the court side seats, thanks Spike… thanks to you 29 16 and 8. Spike stay costing us.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- BBALLER4FR
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,539
- And1: 8,480
- Joined: May 05, 2004
- Location: Not sure anymore.
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Chanel Bomber wrote:Final thought:
I know Rose is carrying this team coming off the bench, and that the "It doesn't matter who starts, but who finishes" platitude is more popular than ever, but I wonder if this team shouldn't rip the band-aid, start Rose (its best player), and then have a more realistic approach to finding a proper back-up PG.
The organization seems paralyzed when it comes to acquiring an actual starting PG - maybe because the price is supposedly "so" high (it's high for a reason). But Rose is playing like one. So why not start Rose, and get a competent two-way back-up PG via trade.
There's a reason why Boston and OKC felt they were better off without Kemba Walker. He sucks.
Preach!
It's a shame regarding Kemba but he cannot be trusted. And it ain't just his defense. As much difficulty he has moving his feet on defense, he is atrocious at moving his feet to get shots for anyone (including himself) on the the floor. He is literally a statue shooter. It's a bad look for such a previously dynamic player. makes you appreciate Rose all the more.
Karl Anthony-Towms
There goes my hero. He's ordinary.
There goes my hero. He's ordinary.
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 94,861
- And1: 135,938
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Monk1718 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Monk1718 wrote:!!!!!!!!!!!
gonna need you to morph frank into rj
this is art



It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,272
- And1: 94,924
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
god shammgod wrote:this was a bad loss but i want to see us against the better teams. last year's knicks could rely on defense to stay in most games. now we're more dependent on offense and that goes cold like it did tonight. we're not the same defensive team. too many bad individual defenders.
You didn't think last year's team was going anywhere anyway, so why do you care?
It's just a different team now.

Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- Monk1718
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,642
- And1: 19,841
- Joined: Jul 10, 2014
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Just want I want to see after a Knicks L…a billy Joel concert from 20 years ago. NY WE HERE
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
Good Night Mean Girls
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- evevale
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,062
- And1: 18,496
- Joined: Dec 06, 2010
- Location: the internet
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
robillionaire wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
hotter take than that: i doubt anybody wants him
hottest take: his next contract is vet min with the MavKnicks

Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- BBALLER4FR
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,539
- And1: 8,480
- Joined: May 05, 2004
- Location: Not sure anymore.
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
LOL! SPike gave his seats to Cole's mom. GET THAT MAN OUT OF THE GARDEN ALREADY!!!!!
Karl Anthony-Towms
There goes my hero. He's ordinary.
There goes my hero. He's ordinary.
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
- DaGawd
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,663
- And1: 51,594
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
- Location: Queens, NY
-
Re: PG Thread: Oh no, we suck again!
thebuzzardman wrote:Hottest of hot takes:
I'd put RJ into a trade for a star in split second.
It’s faxxx not a hot take
BaF
Washington Wizards
Washington Wizards