Spot31 wrote:
Should be in the gym working on his jumpshot instead
Thank you. Exactly.
And how about getting some rest after being sick for so long.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Spot31 wrote:
Should be in the gym working on his jumpshot instead

HarthorneWingo wrote:Spot31 wrote:
Should be in the gym working on his jumpshot instead
Thank you. Exactly.
And how about getting some rest after being sick for so long.
Chanel Bomber wrote:
I don't have any issues with this.
I rather disagree with the narrative that he works on his game 30 hours a day and that his supernatural work ethic guarantees that he will eventually surpass his peers. First of all, it won't, because talent matters, and we know he has ventures outside of basketball, and he's in the best market to pursue those other interests.
I do fear for his commitment to the game when he inevitably becomes a bit part player or a supporting actor in the NBA. His motivation assumedly is that he believes he's destined for stardom. We will see.
But this in and of itself is a non-issue to me.

Chanel Bomber wrote:
I don't have any issues with this.
I rather disagree with the narrative that he works on his game 30 hours a day and that his supernatural work ethic guarantees that he will eventually surpass his peers. First of all, it won't, because talent matters, and we know he has ventures outside of basketball, and he's in the best market to pursue those other interests.
I do fear for his commitment to the game when he inevitably becomes a bit part player or a supporting actor in the NBA. His motivation assumedly is that he believes he's destined for stardom. We will see.
But this in and of itself is a non-issue to me.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:
I don't have any issues with this.
I rather disagree with the narrative that he works on his game 30 hours a day and that his supernatural work ethic guarantees that he will eventually surpass his peers. First of all, it won't, because talent matters, and we know he has ventures outside of basketball, and he's in the best market to pursue those other interests.
I do fear for his commitment to the game when he inevitably becomes a bit part player or a supporting actor in the NBA. His motivation assumedly is that he believes he's destined for stardom. We will see.
But this in and of itself is a non-issue to me.
counterpoint - why should he be allowed to have any fun when he makes us miserable watching the knicks?
Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:
I don't have any issues with this.
I rather disagree with the narrative that he works on his game 30 hours a day and that his supernatural work ethic guarantees that he will eventually surpass his peers. First of all, it won't, because talent matters, and we know he has ventures outside of basketball, and he's in the best market to pursue those other interests.
I do fear for his commitment to the game when he inevitably becomes a bit part player or a supporting actor in the NBA. His motivation assumedly is that he believes he's destined for stardom. We will see.
But this in and of itself is a non-issue to me.
counterpoint - why should he be allowed to have any fun when he makes us miserable watching the knicks?
Fat Kat wrote:

Chanel Bomber wrote:Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:I don't have any issues with this.
I rather disagree with the narrative that he works on his game 30 hours a day and that his supernatural work ethic guarantees that he will eventually surpass his peers. First of all, it won't, because talent matters, and we know he has ventures outside of basketball, and he's in the best market to pursue those other interests.
I do fear for his commitment to the game when he inevitably becomes a bit part player or a supporting actor in the NBA. His motivation assumedly is that he believes he's destined for stardom. We will see.
But this in and of itself is a non-issue to me.
counterpoint - why should he be allowed to have any fun when he makes us miserable watching the knicks?
You win.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Guano wrote:
counterpoint - why should he be allowed to have any fun when he makes us miserable watching the knicks?
You win.
none of us win - we are here rooting for the knicks

3toheadmelo wrote:Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:You win.
none of us win - we are here rooting for the knicks
melozakistan is winning

Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:Guano wrote:
counterpoint - why should he be allowed to have any fun when he makes us miserable watching the knicks?
You win.
none of us win - we are here rooting for the knicks
Fat Kat wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:Guano wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:You win.
none of us win - we are here rooting for the knicks
Who said I was rooting for the Knicks
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.