mpharris36 wrote:
I still contend after Randle eventually signs his new deal KAT will be a more attractive piece in a future trade especially as the cap continues to rise. He is just a more seamless fit with the modern NBA. He has his quirks but I think most FO don't see KAT as a lose cannon as much as Randle. So I just feel in the future his contract will be more easier to move especially if he's player well here rather than Randles new extension contract.
Minny made there bed with the Gobert trade...if they tried to re-trade him there is zero chance they would re-coup even close to the draft equity they lost. So that made KAT's contract the odd man out now they need to pay NAW and Naz.
I think the position they were in with Ant Edwards contract kicking in along with McDaniels and still having Gobert...you got to make choices unless you are going to pay obscene tax which Minny clearly wasn't willing to do.
You're still comparing KAT to Randle. If that's the standard for this deal then sure I guess. To me the standard for this deal is did you give up positive assets for a positive asset. We gave up positive assets for a player the Wolves couldn't find any other suitors for because his contract is awful.
Minny didn't make **** with the Gobert trade, KAT is on the way out because for all the "modern NBA" talk Gobert fits the modern NBA way more. KAT is a tweener on defense, he's never won **** as the best player on a team and he's making $56 million a year. Nobody wants to give a player that's not even top 30 Steph, Embiid, and Jokic money with the current CBA and the 2nd apron. Besides his old agent apparently.
And for the second bold part I think Minny doesn't mind paying the tax. They mind paying the tax for a guy that's significantly less productive than NAW, Naz, and Donte combined. KAT the concept and KAT the player ain't the same. We've seen Minny without him for large parts of the last two seasons and last year they went 14-6 without him (a higher win percentage than with him), 2023 they went 15-14 with him and 27-26 without him (about even), and looking at his on off in the playoffs the last two years they've played +11.4 points per 100 better with him on the bench. Last year in the regular season they were +0.2 points per 100 better with him on the bench. The juice just isn't worth the squeeze.
Naz is probably looking to get about 4/100 and he averaged 18/7/2 as a starter with similar percentages to KAT and slightly better defense IMO. He's just not that much better than guys that can be grabbed at half his cost, and it's not hard to find shooting PFs that can't protect the rim (which is what he is in Minny) so they cut bait.