knicks1999 wrote:So Clarkson it is…..can’t be worse than Payne!
kolek is working on it. we must think we have enough there to bring shamet back instead of another PG.
Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks

knicks1999 wrote:So Clarkson it is…..can’t be worse than Payne!
Jeff Van Gully wrote:knicks1999 wrote:So Clarkson it is…..can’t be worse than Payne!
kolek is working on it. we must think we have enough there to bring shamet back instead of another PG.
Google AI Overview wrote:Based on career statistics and scouting reports, Garrison Mathews is a better defender than Landry Shamet. While neither player is known as a lockdown defender, Mathews has a reputation for high effort and foul-drawing, while Shamet has consistently been targeted by offenses due to his defensive limitations.
Defensive strengths and weaknesses
Garrison Mathews
Strengths: Mathews is known for his high motor, relentless effort, and willingness to draw charges, which he does at an elite level. He has improved his understanding of team defensive schemes, including communication and positioning.
Weaknesses: Despite his effort, Mathews is still considered a below-average defender. He can be exploited by faster perimeter players and has struggled when defending pick-and-rolls, an area where his athletic limitations are exposed.
Landry Shamet
Strengths: Shamet is a good team defender with a high basketball IQ, and his length allows him to contest shots.
Weaknesses: Shamet lacks the lateral quickness and physical strength to consistently stay in front of quicker or stronger opponents. He is also susceptible to getting lost in screens, making him a frequent target for opposing offenses. His defensive metrics have been consistently poor throughout his career.
Summary
While neither player offers high-end perimeter defense, Mathews is the more reliable and impactful defender. His exceptional effort and knack for drawing offensive fouls give him a defensive edge that Shamet lacks. Shamet, by contrast, has been viewed as a defensive liability who is often hidden by his team to avoid mismatches.
ctorres wrote:
Shamet has his work cut out for him. According to Google, Matthews is a better defender.Google AI Overview wrote:Based on career statistics and scouting reports, Garrison Mathews is a better defender than Landry Shamet. While neither player is known as a lockdown defender, Mathews has a reputation for high effort and foul-drawing, while Shamet has consistently been targeted by offenses due to his defensive limitations.
Defensive strengths and weaknesses
Garrison Mathews
Strengths: Mathews is known for his high motor, relentless effort, and willingness to draw charges, which he does at an elite level. He has improved his understanding of team defensive schemes, including communication and positioning.
Weaknesses: Despite his effort, Mathews is still considered a below-average defender. He can be exploited by faster perimeter players and has struggled when defending pick-and-rolls, an area where his athletic limitations are exposed.
Landry Shamet
Strengths: Shamet is a good team defender with a high basketball IQ, and his length allows him to contest shots.
Weaknesses: Shamet lacks the lateral quickness and physical strength to consistently stay in front of quicker or stronger opponents. He is also susceptible to getting lost in screens, making him a frequent target for opposing offenses. His defensive metrics have been consistently poor throughout his career.
Summary
While neither player offers high-end perimeter defense, Mathews is the more reliable and impactful defender. His exceptional effort and knack for drawing offensive fouls give him a defensive edge that Shamet lacks. Shamet, by contrast, has been viewed as a defensive liability who is often hidden by his team to avoid mismatches.
TheGreenArrow wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:8516knicks wrote:"The Knicks have enough room for rookie vet minimum under the second apron." What is a ROOKIE VET contract? I didn't know there was such a thing. How many years before a vet qualifies for a regular vet minimum versus a rookie vet minimum?![]()
![]()
Rookie vet is a guy like McCullars, right?
Who else on the Knicks might qualify? Hukporti or Dadiet? Both are under contract.
Pate?
Is there room for a two way still, or is that out?
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g


JayTWill wrote:Shamet's deal isn't guaranteed?
thebuzzardman wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Rookie vet is a guy like McCullars, right?
Who else on the Knicks might qualify? Hukporti or Dadiet? Both are under contract.
Pate?
Is there room for a two way still, or is that out?
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Is he that scrappy little redneck that was on the heat?
Shamet averaged 5.7 points and 1.2 rebounds while shooting 39.7 percent in 15.2 minutes across 50 games last season with the Knicks.
thebuzzardman wrote:What’s the rule on two way contracts? Two orthree in total so the Knicks could go 14+3 = 17 spots? Or 15+2?
So end of roster is:
Shamet or Matthew
Tiny rookie vet is McCullars or Dink
Two way deals are McCullars or Dink or Diawara, pick 2?
Richard4444 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:What’s the rule on two way contracts? Two orthree in total so the Knicks could go 14+3 = 17 spots? Or 15+2?
So end of roster is:
Shamet or Matthew
Tiny rookie vet is McCullars or Dink
Two way deals are McCullars or Dink or Diawara, pick 2?
There isnt rookie vets in NBA. We need a rookie min. He should be Diawara. Dink or Nnaji.
I dont think McCullars qualify as a rookie because he played last season.

Richard4444 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:What’s the rule on two way contracts? Two orthree in total so the Knicks could go 14+3 = 17 spots? Or 15+2?
So end of roster is:
Shamet or Matthew
Tiny rookie vet is McCullars or Dink
Two way deals are McCullars or Dink or Diawara, pick 2?
There isnt rookie vets in NBA. We need a rookie min. He should be Diawara. Dink or Nnaji.
I dont think McCullars qualify as a rookie because he played last season.
Wildcat wrote:It was the only real move. Malcolm wasn't coming over for questionable minutes. Shamet will be okay with that role. I am a bit concern on how thin we are up front, though.