whocares1 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:whocares1 wrote:
They never replaced what Randle gave the team. At the end of the day you can’t depend on anyone other than Brunson to create for others.
It's fine they moved on from Randle, because he tried to create more than he should have.
And in theory, I liked that they went for KAT because they can play 5 out with him at the 5.
Which would work if KAT was a really good 3 point shooter, but is really any better than any other C who shoots good from 3? Is he special? Not really.
Also, they probably figured KAT can playmake some from the 5, give a little of Randle and some of iHart.
Except there's only been like 1 play this year with KAT doing some passing from the high post.
Mostly it's KAT doing P&Rs with Brunson, a zillion trailing 3s, and several of KATs drive to the baskets awkwardly, score half the time, offensive foul half the time, always complain to the refs, drives.
I will agree that he might’ve tried to create too much at times but this team needs another perimeter facilitator and not one like an Isaiah Hartenstein (tho that would obviously help).
Towns and Mikal do not draw multiple defenders like Randle can. This team needs a player like that.
As long as it's not Randle, that would be nice.
For 5 1st round picks would be cool if Bridges created a little gravity.
At least he can get his own shot off.
At this point, you kind of have to question the FO having $130 million invested in 3 players not one of which is elite at dribble drive, 3 level scoring etc.
Kind of how you build teams that can't win it all. Too many $ tied up in non top 10 talent.