Falstaffxx wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:
Shooting percentage went from 44.9% to 42.1%
3-point % went from 38.2% to 34.1%
PPG went from 18 to 14.2
Rebounds went from 2.5 per game to 1.7 per game
You can say the same for Toney Douglas too.
But here is the difference......
Toney declined with more minutes and more shot attempts...every shooting category took a dump.
Crawford had less minutes, shot attempts, games and zero starts.
Toney was a reason why we got swept. 36% shooting in the playoffs allowing his defense to be laughed at by having Rondo blow by him on every drive.
I would like to believe Crawford was a reason why ATL advanced.
The real difference between the two is that Toney Douglas was in his second season, seeing his responsibilities and expectations jump up for the first time - and his shooting percentage went down. Crawford is a veteran, soon to be 32, whose numbers went down across the board while playing the same minutes and in the same role as he had the previous year. If you have to bet on which player's numbers will trend upward, Douglas is the much safer bet.
Is that the criteria you're gonna use?
Crawford numbers went down because he took less shots, over 200 less.
And since when is a player not allowed to get older and see his production dip? They all do it.
Toney almost doubled his minutes from year one to year 2 and just about every single category fell off.
It's not a point of whose numbers will go up with me.
It's who I will plug in a role to help get me a championship, which was my original thought process.
Jamal Crawford as sixth man>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Toney Douglas as whatever his role supposed to be.
























