ImageImageImageImageImage

Randle's Future

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85

What would you do with Randle?

Poll ended at Sun Aug 4, 2024 1:01 pm

Keep him for this season, then let him walk
11
12%
Extend him now (Aug 3 deadline)
53
57%
Trade him now (add details in comments)
16
17%
Other (please put in comments)
13
14%
 
Total votes: 93

Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,179
And1: 3,129
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#281 » by Nazrmohamed » Thu Aug 15, 2024 2:57 am

KnicksGadfly wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
Chislic wrote:The Knicks going 12-2 in January is not an argument to keep Randle. Small sample size. Not proof of concept. No, this doesn't prove he fits. It's called a winning streak. Compatibility can be temporary. (When all players are locked in and playing unselfish.)

Randle went 12-1 with RJ Barrett TWICE. How compatible were they?? :crazy:


Can't tell if you're for or against or being sarcastic. You want him part of this team or not? Cuz all you seemed to show is that we play well with Randle nomatter what group of guys we play with him. And our record since he's been here sortve proves it. I watched him win with Elfrid Peyton, Reggie Bullock, a sophomore RJ and Nerlens Noel. There is no, nor has there ever been a lineup he doesn't fit into. So idk what fit people are talking about.


Well, considering Randle has a 166-164 with the Knicks, I'm not sure what you've proving, considering we've had a 47 and 50 win season with Brunson leading the team these past 2 years.

Randle is a **** fit with so many players...I'm not even sure he would even do the dirty work needed to play on the Olympics team. It's never been an issue with ability for him. Just whether he wants to sacrifice. That's why if anyone asks me to eat crow for Randle again, they're going to have to specify what type of crow they want to serve. "Eat some crow...I told you Randle would be willing to play defense 4 years later! You should have never doubted him...just trade for an All-NBA defender who we need to pay 40 mill a year to, and I promise you he will play defense for 14 games!"



Except this

Read on Twitter


I think he fits
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,502
And1: 28,335
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#282 » by Iron Mantis » Thu Aug 15, 2024 11:07 am

Nazrmohamed wrote:
KnicksGadfly wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
Can't tell if you're for or against or being sarcastic. You want him part of this team or not? Cuz all you seemed to show is that we play well with Randle nomatter what group of guys we play with him. And our record since he's been here sortve proves it. I watched him win with Elfrid Peyton, Reggie Bullock, a sophomore RJ and Nerlens Noel. There is no, nor has there ever been a lineup he doesn't fit into. So idk what fit people are talking about.


Well, considering Randle has a 166-164 with the Knicks, I'm not sure what you've proving, considering we've had a 47 and 50 win season with Brunson leading the team these past 2 years.

Randle is a **** fit with so many players...I'm not even sure he would even do the dirty work needed to play on the Olympics team. It's never been an issue with ability for him. Just whether he wants to sacrifice. That's why if anyone asks me to eat crow for Randle again, they're going to have to specify what type of crow they want to serve. "Eat some crow...I told you Randle would be willing to play defense 4 years later! You should have never doubted him...just trade for an All-NBA defender who we need to pay 40 mill a year to, and I promise you he will play defense for 14 games!"



Except this

Read on Twitter


I think he fits

The post you responded to specifically mentioned Randle's unwillingness to play defense and do the dirty work like hustling and setting screens etc.

And so far his offensive prowess has failed to translate in the playoffs but we are hoping that changes this year.
Image
StlHawksFan
Junior
Posts: 395
And1: 247
Joined: Apr 26, 2024

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#283 » by StlHawksFan » Thu Aug 15, 2024 1:44 pm

Randle gets crap a lot because he takes plays off here and there. But in bulk, his DBPM is 0.0 as a Knick, meaning he is an average defender overall -- and that includes his rough first and third seasons where he actually wasn't playing defense. So, logically, a motivated Randle is potentially a + defender.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,104
And1: 137,829
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#284 » by 3toheadmelo » Thu Aug 15, 2024 2:02 pm

Nazrmohamed wrote:
KnicksGadfly wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
Can't tell if you're for or against or being sarcastic. You want him part of this team or not? Cuz all you seemed to show is that we play well with Randle nomatter what group of guys we play with him. And our record since he's been here sortve proves it. I watched him win with Elfrid Peyton, Reggie Bullock, a sophomore RJ and Nerlens Noel. There is no, nor has there ever been a lineup he doesn't fit into. So idk what fit people are talking about.


Well, considering Randle has a 166-164 with the Knicks, I'm not sure what you've proving, considering we've had a 47 and 50 win season with Brunson leading the team these past 2 years.

Randle is a **** fit with so many players...I'm not even sure he would even do the dirty work needed to play on the Olympics team. It's never been an issue with ability for him. Just whether he wants to sacrifice. That's why if anyone asks me to eat crow for Randle again, they're going to have to specify what type of crow they want to serve. "Eat some crow...I told you Randle would be willing to play defense 4 years later! You should have never doubted him...just trade for an All-NBA defender who we need to pay 40 mill a year to, and I promise you he will play defense for 14 games!"



Except this

Read on Twitter


I think he fits

The bad fit was RJ.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,502
And1: 28,335
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#285 » by Iron Mantis » Thu Aug 15, 2024 10:45 pm

StlHawksFan wrote:Randle gets crap a lot because he takes plays off here and there. But in bulk, his DBPM is 0.0 as a Knick, meaning he is an average defender overall -- and that includes his rough first and third seasons where he actually wasn't playing defense. So, logically, a motivated Randle is potentially a + defender.

But does he want be?

Would love to see consistent effort on that end.

For a big who finds himself hanging around the paint a lot looking for rebounds, you'd like to see him at least get in front of guys driving or try to block a shot or two.

Fun trivia question

Who averaged more blocks per game last season: Julius Randle or Steph Curry?
Image
User avatar
rajajackal
General Manager
Posts: 7,694
And1: 9,851
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#286 » by rajajackal » Thu Aug 15, 2024 11:20 pm

your 1 and 2 options being defensively subpar/par is okay when you have the best wing defending tandem in the league sharing the 3rd option duties and mighty mitchell robinson down low
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,502
And1: 28,335
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#287 » by Iron Mantis » Thu Aug 15, 2024 11:50 pm

rajajackal wrote:your 1 and 2 options being defensively subpar/par is okay when you have the best wing defending tandem in the league sharing the 3rd option duties and mighty mitchell robinson down low

Mitch and OG healthy At the same time?? AND in the playoffs??

Have fun with that....

Image
Image
User avatar
rajajackal
General Manager
Posts: 7,694
And1: 9,851
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#288 » by rajajackal » Fri Aug 16, 2024 12:00 am

Iron Mantis wrote:
rajajackal wrote:your 1 and 2 options being defensively subpar/par is okay when you have the best wing defending tandem in the league sharing the 3rd option duties and mighty mitchell robinson down low

Mitch and OG healthy At the same time?? AND in the playoffs??

Have fun with that....

Image

i think we have the personnel rn for everyone to play more sustainably. i've been convinced that our new sports medicine hire is meant to counter the thibs effect but i'm not going to pretend that's anything more than an inference on my part
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,720
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#289 » by moocow007 » Fri Aug 16, 2024 5:08 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:
KnicksGadfly wrote:
Well, considering Randle has a 166-164 with the Knicks, I'm not sure what you've proving, considering we've had a 47 and 50 win season with Brunson leading the team these past 2 years.

Randle is a **** fit with so many players...I'm not even sure he would even do the dirty work needed to play on the Olympics team. It's never been an issue with ability for him. Just whether he wants to sacrifice. That's why if anyone asks me to eat crow for Randle again, they're going to have to specify what type of crow they want to serve. "Eat some crow...I told you Randle would be willing to play defense 4 years later! You should have never doubted him...just trade for an All-NBA defender who we need to pay 40 mill a year to, and I promise you he will play defense for 14 games!"



Except this

Read on Twitter


I think he fits

The bad fit was RJ.


This. The choice between Randle and RJ was crystal clear and yet, much as with so many other things, people kept wanting to make it complicated. And years later we're still at the "why can't Randle lead the Knicks to anything when it was just him and a bunch of misfitting poop, let's get rid of him cause hes crap."
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,808
And1: 19,367
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#290 » by KnicksGadfly » Fri Aug 16, 2024 6:34 pm

moocow007 wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
Nazrmohamed wrote:

Except this

Read on Twitter


I think he fits

The bad fit was RJ.


This. The choice between Randle and RJ was crystal clear and yet, much as with so many other things, people kept wanting to make it complicated. And years later we're still at the "why can't Randle lead the Knicks to anything when it was just him and a bunch of misfitting poop, let's get rid of him cause hes crap."


Nah...I actually didn't want to bring up Randle's record, but it only started when nazr started spouting fake news about Randle and telling us that Randle's record with the Knicks spoke for itself. So then I looked up Randle's impact on the Knicks and lo and behold, Randle has a 166-164. So, like I said, if you're gonna defend Randle, bring the arguments. Check the facts.

Truth be told, I don't use Randle's record to justify anything. I don't use the booing thing...anyone caught up on that is dumb. I think there's a bigger issue with Randle, that has to do entirely with basketball. I'd just like to summarize some of the points Randle supporters are making in this thread.

Randle can be a good defender...when he's motivated.


This is so damning. We've had a lot of excuses for Randle over the years. We blamed the fans (although I tend to think the fans boo because of poor effort first, and even then, it's so stupid if an athlete stops playing defense over booing). We blamed Randle having a child. Guess we're blaming RJ. Blamed the work load he was taking on. Lots of excuses. What are we making excuses for? Lack of effort. It's extremely frustrating during the regular season. If that happened in the postseason? Man...if Josh Hart was playing 48 minutes and getting triple doubles and OG was hobbling and Brunson came back from injury and Randle was still not doing his best?

We are now a team that wants a championship. We are trying to rely on a guy who can be a good defender...if he's motivated...and apparently, there have only been 2 times in the past 5 years he's been really motivated. Once, when he was in the bubble, fighting for a contract, and the team had drafted his replacement. Once, for a short span of 14 games, when we traded for an all NBA defender who we then had to pay 212 million to.

Let's get back on track and make this thread about motivation. Let's talk about motivation. Leave behind the booing. Leave behind RJ. Leave behind his record, even. Tell me I can have a motivated Randle, right now, for the next few years, and let's get that contract signed. I'll support it wholeheartedly. Or have you all given up on that Randle...the Randle we saw in 2020-2021?
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 96,104
And1: 137,829
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#291 » by 3toheadmelo » Fri Aug 16, 2024 8:49 pm

Read on Twitter
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
User avatar
NYKnickerbocker
RealGM
Posts: 19,885
And1: 14,291
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
Location: Queens
       

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#292 » by NYKnickerbocker » Fri Aug 16, 2024 9:58 pm

KnicksGadfly wrote:
moocow007 wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:The bad fit was RJ.


This. The choice between Randle and RJ was crystal clear and yet, much as with so many other things, people kept wanting to make it complicated. And years later we're still at the "why can't Randle lead the Knicks to anything when it was just him and a bunch of misfitting poop, let's get rid of him cause hes crap."


Nah...I actually didn't want to bring up Randle's record, but it only started when nazr started spouting fake news about Randle and telling us that Randle's record with the Knicks spoke for itself. So then I looked up Randle's impact on the Knicks and lo and behold, Randle has a 166-164. So, like I said, if you're gonna defend Randle, bring the arguments. Check the facts.

Truth be told, I don't use Randle's record to justify anything. I don't use the booing thing...anyone caught up on that is dumb. I think there's a bigger issue with Randle, that has to do entirely with basketball. I'd just like to summarize some of the points Randle supporters are making in this thread.

Randle can be a good defender...when he's motivated.


This is so damning. We've had a lot of excuses for Randle over the years. We blamed the fans (although I tend to think the fans boo because of poor effort first, and even then, it's so stupid if an athlete stops playing defense over booing). We blamed Randle having a child. Guess we're blaming RJ. Blamed the work load he was taking on. Lots of excuses. What are we making excuses for? Lack of effort. It's extremely frustrating during the regular season. If that happened in the postseason? Man...if Josh Hart was playing 48 minutes and getting triple doubles and OG was hobbling and Brunson came back from injury and Randle was still not doing his best?

We are now a team that wants a championship. We are trying to rely on a guy who can be a good defender...if he's motivated...and apparently, there have only been 2 times in the past 5 years he's been really motivated. Once, when he was in the bubble, fighting for a contract, and the team had drafted his replacement. Once, for a short span of 14 games, when we traded for an all NBA defender who we then had to pay 212 million to.

Let's get back on track and make this thread about motivation. Let's talk about motivation. Leave behind the booing. Leave behind RJ. Leave behind his record, even. Tell me I can have a motivated Randle, right now, for the next few years, and let's get that contract signed. I'll support it wholeheartedly. Or have you all given up on that Randle...the Randle we saw in 2020-2021?

I mean what was the Knicks record before Randle lolz. 2 games over is probably a massive improvement over whatever previous reign we had. And that’s only gunna get better over the next few years in the Brunson/Randle era
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#293 » by aggo » Fri Aug 16, 2024 10:29 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
Read on Twitter

no amount of stats can hide the reality


Read on Twitter
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,840
And1: 137,939
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#294 » by god shammgod » Fri Aug 16, 2024 10:49 pm

yeah, randle is probably not a fit in the near future...like melo's current pants
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,502
And1: 28,335
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#295 » by Iron Mantis » Fri Aug 16, 2024 11:26 pm

aggo wrote:no amount of stats can hide the reality


Read on Twitter





Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter
Image
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#296 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 17, 2024 12:14 am

Netflix has bought the rights to this thread for a show called Randle's Future

My sources say it is going to be a legal thriller about an NBA player and his fans. The first episode is titled, "The Defense Rests"
Moose
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,750
And1: 1,689
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#297 » by Moose » Sat Aug 17, 2024 12:49 am

Clyde_Style wrote:Netflix has bought the rights to this thread for a show called Randle's Future

My sources say it is going to be a legal thriller about an NBA player and his fans. The first episode is titled, "The Defense Rests"


As the thread starter, I expect a little kickback.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#298 » by Clyde_Style » Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:09 am

Moose wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:Netflix has bought the rights to this thread for a show called Randle's Future

My sources say it is going to be a legal thriller about an NBA player and his fans. The first episode is titled, "The Defense Rests"


As the thread starter, I expect a little kickback.


Line item 85.b(i) of purchase memorandum states:

"OP shall be entitled to gratis three month subscription to Netflix and one Randle's Future paraphernalia item of their choosing."
Moose
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,750
And1: 1,689
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#299 » by Moose » Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:16 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Moose wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:Netflix has bought the rights to this thread for a show called Randle's Future

My sources say it is going to be a legal thriller about an NBA player and his fans. The first episode is titled, "The Defense Rests"


As the thread starter, I expect a little kickback.


Line item 85.b(i) of purchase memorandum states:

"OP shall be entitled to gratis three month subscription to Netflix and one Randle's Future paraphernalia item of their choosing."


Throw in a pair of mid-tier MSG playoff tickets for each round the Knicks play in over the next three years and you got yourself a deal.
cgmw
RealGM
Posts: 22,545
And1: 10,445
Joined: Jul 23, 2003
Location: Winning now since 1973
Contact:
 

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#300 » by cgmw » Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:32 am

Iron Mantis wrote:
aggo wrote:no amount of stats can hide the reality


Read on Twitter





Read on Twitter



Read on Twitter

The blatant lack of effort is one thing, but it’s the throwing his hands up at the end blaming his own teammates lack of rim protection that really does it for me.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."

Return to New York Knicks