KnicksGadfly wrote:Nazrmohamed wrote:Chislic wrote:The Knicks going 12-2 in January is not an argument to keep Randle. Small sample size. Not proof of concept. No, this doesn't prove he fits. It's called a winning streak. Compatibility can be temporary. (When all players are locked in and playing unselfish.)
Randle went 12-1 with RJ Barrett TWICE. How compatible were they??
Can't tell if you're for or against or being sarcastic. You want him part of this team or not? Cuz all you seemed to show is that we play well with Randle nomatter what group of guys we play with him. And our record since he's been here sortve proves it. I watched him win with Elfrid Peyton, Reggie Bullock, a sophomore RJ and Nerlens Noel. There is no, nor has there ever been a lineup he doesn't fit into. So idk what fit people are talking about.
Well, considering Randle has a 166-164 with the Knicks, I'm not sure what you've proving, considering we've had a 47 and 50 win season with Brunson leading the team these past 2 years.
Randle is a **** fit with so many players...I'm not even sure he would even do the dirty work needed to play on the Olympics team. It's never been an issue with ability for him. Just whether he wants to sacrifice. That's why if anyone asks me to eat crow for Randle again, they're going to have to specify what type of crow they want to serve. "Eat some crow...I told you Randle would be willing to play defense 4 years later! You should have never doubted him...just trade for an All-NBA defender who we need to pay 40 mill a year to, and I promise you he will play defense for 14 games!"
Except this
I think he fits


























