Greenie wrote:Ime Udoka for coach.
Once a Knick, always a Knick.
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Greenie wrote:Ime Udoka for coach.
Jeff Van Gully wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:As much as I think Jeff sticks to the vets too long and that it sucks we're going to be in the latter half of the lottery most likely, people complaining that this team isn't tanking hard enough since KP was out are absurd and detached from reality. We're 4-15 since KP went down. Good for a pace of 1618 wins over the course of a full season. Fcat of the matter is, if tanking was your ultimate goal this year blame KP for going nuclear in the first 2 months of the season.... Even if we sold off Lee, KOQ, and Beas at the deadline what does that get us 1 extra loss over that time period? Most of the wins have come from standout Burke performances anyway... Teams got a head start on us tanking. It is what it is. Just hope we find a stud anywhere from 8-10.
Yeah we were most likely gonna win a handful of games no matter what by the end of the season. KP played like an MVP and carried us for a few weeks in the beginning.
I would blame management #1 though. We keep trying these stay competitive rebuilds. The Hardaway signing was pointless, and we have way too many vets. Wish we could take a more long term approach and had a plan. Accept that we are a bad team instead of trying to fake being a mediocre one
i hear that. i don't mind the tim signing, but i get it. some of it was remnants from phil tho, to be fair to perry. lee was already here. (i like him too and don't mind his guidance on a rebuilding team. i do get the conundrum of his presence requiring him to play minutes though.) noah was already here.
so far, i haven't seen perry do anything against his vision. even the mudiay gamble is the kind of chance i like to see. dude is trash, but was worth a look for the rest of his deal... even if as a reserve, he's a young one with time.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
Clyde_Style wrote:If Trey and Frank are going to be our backcourt, then I would rather not be looking at PGs in the draft and finally find a dynamic two-way small forward, because if Trey and Frank + a bionic KP are combined with an elite SF and you fill out the rest of the roster with great defenders who can hit their shots, you'll be in good shape.
I still think Trey needs to increase their assist ratios, but if they can do that and become the starting PG then that leaves open the question of how to slot Frank, because it still seems the club is going to start Tim at SG. I want to develop Frank as a starter so I'm wondering now if Tim becomes our sixth man and not Trey.
Clyde_Style wrote:vallen wrote:so if Frank is still getting out shined by D-Leaguers and Bottom of the Bench guys at 20 years old can we talk about D-League ?
Is Frank getting torched by his defensive assignments?
Is Frank not already the best defender not named Porzingis?
Your posts about Frank are so embarrassingly bad.
HEZI wrote:Context wrote:HEZI wrote:
Blame the Wizards not the Knicks. Can't expect the Knicks players to just lay down on their back in the middle of the court. Bradley Beal looking like THJ out there.
I dont blame the players... I blame whoever made the decision not to blow up the team when KP went down.
I hear you but it's not like we've been winning games though. Before yesterday we were like 3-14 since KP got hurt and really we had no business winning yesterday but the Wizards were just terrible. Even if we take out those wins we would still only be what, tied for 7th or 8th right now?
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Burke was a great pickup, and is one of our best players but he still looks like a 6th man overall. It’s still a valuable role and we should keep him. Maybe he does become more. There’s really nobody on this roster I can pencil in as a really good starter minus KP.
In the meantime on this team I am all for Frank and Burke starting and getting a lot of minutes....let Troy free too.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
vallen wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:vallen wrote:so if Frank is still getting out shined by D-Leaguers and Bottom of the Bench guys at 20 years old can we talk about D-League ?
Is Frank getting torched by his defensive assignments?
Is Frank not already the best defender not named Porzingis?
Your posts about Frank are so embarrassingly bad.
lol. ok sure. hes Renaldo Balkman. wow look out. the kid needs to play 45 minutes to equate numbers real backups put up in 20. Your responses are so embarrassingly naive and completely from the view of blue and orange glasses. the one good thing he does doesnt make up for the 12 other things he doesnt. but ya. he plays good man to man and has long arms. look out NBA.
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:If Trey and Frank are going to be our backcourt, then I would rather not be looking at PGs in the draft and finally find a dynamic two-way small forward, because if Trey and Frank + a bionic KP are combined with an elite SF and you fill out the rest of the roster with great defenders who can hit their shots, you'll be in good shape.
I still think Trey needs to increase their assist ratios, but if they can do that and become the starting PG then that leaves open the question of how to slot Frank, because it still seems the club is going to start Tim at SG. I want to develop Frank as a starter so I'm wondering now if Tim becomes our sixth man and not Trey.
If we stay at #8/#9, I don't think we have the opportunity to be picky about position. We need to take whoever we think is the best player whether its a G, wing or big. Really depends who's left as it could be slim pickings.
If Mikal is available I would jump on him so would agree with that premise. Best player could be a guard though if hes gone.
K P 6 wrote:We locked in at 9. Its okay to let go now lol.
Clyde_Style wrote:If Trey and Frank are going to be our backcourt, then I would rather not be looking at PGs in the draft and finally find a dynamic two-way small forward, because if Trey and Frank + a bionic KP are combined with an elite SF and you fill out the rest of the roster with great defenders who can hit their shots, you'll be in good shape.
I still think Trey needs to increase their assist ratios, but if they can do that and become the starting PG then that leaves open the question of how to slot Frank, because it still seems the club is going to start Tim at SG. I want to develop Frank as a starter so I'm wondering now if Tim becomes our sixth man and not Trey.
BBALLER4FR wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:If Trey and Frank are going to be our backcourt, then I would rather not be looking at PGs in the draft and finally find a dynamic two-way small forward, because if Trey and Frank + a bionic KP are combined with an elite SF and you fill out the rest of the roster with great defenders who can hit their shots, you'll be in good shape.
I still think Trey needs to increase their assist ratios, but if they can do that and become the starting PG then that leaves open the question of how to slot Frank, because it still seems the club is going to start Tim at SG. I want to develop Frank as a starter so I'm wondering now if Tim becomes our sixth man and not Trey.
Not happening. If we draft SF this summer, the Knicks would slot Tim at SG and unless Frank comes in a totally different player next season, he'd be coming off the bench. It's sad but Titm is more of a shooter than Frank and Trey is more of a play maker than Frank. We clearly miss out on defense, but Frank's inability to create for himself or others and his tentativeness to become an offensive threat are such liabilities that the organization will feel compelled to bring him off the bench.
BBALLER4FR wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:If Trey and Frank are going to be our backcourt, then I would rather not be looking at PGs in the draft and finally find a dynamic two-way small forward, because if Trey and Frank + a bionic KP are combined with an elite SF and you fill out the rest of the roster with great defenders who can hit their shots, you'll be in good shape.
I still think Trey needs to increase their assist ratios, but if they can do that and become the starting PG then that leaves open the question of how to slot Frank, because it still seems the club is going to start Tim at SG. I want to develop Frank as a starter so I'm wondering now if Tim becomes our sixth man and not Trey.
Not happening. If we draft SF this summer, the Knicks would slot Tim at SG and unless Frank comes in a totally different player next season, he'd be coming off the bench. It's sad but Titm is more of a shooter than Frank and Trey is more of a play maker than Frank. We clearly miss out on defense, but Frank's inability to create for himself or others and his tentativeness to become an offensive threat are such liabilities that the organization will feel compelled to bring him off the bench.
Clyde_Style wrote:And I'm not even sure why Mudiay should come back next year. He really does not do any one thing very well. Why waste a roster spot on him? Even Baker is a better player and he'll be back.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:And I'm not even sure why Mudiay should come back next year. He really does not do any one thing very well. Why waste a roster spot on him? Even Baker is a better player and he'll be back.
Ehhh I thought Mudiay played well last night and when he plays confidently he's helpful because he's a good passer and a bully on smaller pg's...