CJackson wrote:You ever been accused of rape and showed up 40 minutes late to your own trial?
take your own advice for rose. let the pros do their jobs.
also defendant doesn't need to be present in civil suits.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
CJackson wrote:You ever been accused of rape and showed up 40 minutes late to your own trial?
CJackson wrote:Rotten Apple wrote:KayCSmooth wrote:You're right. I think Rose is innocent, and I'm glad to see her case being picked apart. But cheering or smiling during this case can only hurt your appearance in the eyes of jurors. Of course we don't know the extent of the congratulatory cheers. Hopefully it was subtle. In the end shame on Rose and his lawyers for not being prepared to keep an appropriate, compassionate, & professional demeanor at all times. But again, maybe it was subtle.
Y'all ever been in a court room?
You ever been accused of rape and showed up 40 minutes late to your own trial?

Rotten Apple wrote:CJackson wrote:Rotten Apple wrote:
Y'all ever been in a court room?
You ever been accused of rape and showed up 40 minutes late to your own trial?
Well I was not referencing that but sides celebrate all the time in court rooms Rose did nothing wrong but of course his name is not Porzingis so he's open for verbal attacks on here.
CJackson wrote:Rotten Apple wrote:CJackson wrote:
You ever been accused of rape and showed up 40 minutes late to your own trial?
Well I was not referencing that but sides celebrate all the time in court rooms Rose did nothing wrong but of course his name is not Porzingis so he's open for verbal attacks on here.
OK Troll you're on ignore now
You can't help making it personal with board members when you disagree. You are a troll
Bye
trophywinner wrote:postcall wrote:Thanks man I literally just wanted a source to read for myself. I didn't mean to imply anything lol.
i know, i just found it interesting that her testimony is largely based on her background & personality. being timid, naive, non-sexual, almost prudish. yet her texts to rose show her as a freak, deviant, and vulgar. she's crazy.
RHODEY wrote:trophywinner wrote:postcall wrote:Thanks man I literally just wanted a source to read for myself. I didn't mean to imply anything lol.
i know, i just found it interesting that her testimony is largely based on her background & personality. being timid, naive, non-sexual, almost prudish. yet her texts to rose show her as a freak, deviant, and vulgar. she's crazy.
Bingo.
CJackson wrote:It is likely nothing actionable will be proven conclusively either way. I can't see how the jury will reward her for what looks like an amateurish con job.
If you could prove someone lied about a rape accusation they should then go to prison themselves. But this will probably be shut down as he said, she said and wrapped up.
Rape is awful. False rape accusations are completely despicable too.
SoCalKnickFan wrote:The scary thing is without the texts she could have him by the ballz and he'd be facing possible jail time if she put on a convincing performance. Hope he learns from this
trophywinner wrote:CJackson wrote:It is likely nothing actionable will be proven conclusively either way. I can't see how the jury will reward her for what looks like an amateurish con job.
If you could prove someone lied about a rape accusation they should then go to prison themselves. But this will probably be shut down as he said, she said and wrapped up.
Rape is awful. False rape accusations are completely despicable too.
agree on prison time for false accusations. but i guess a lifetime of lawyer fees will have to suffice. she's in deeeeeeeep no doubt
Phish Tank wrote:look, I think everyone agrees Rose is not the brightest bulb outside the basketball court.
The lawsuit and trial is cringeworthy, but at the same time, there are a lot of inconsistencies with the prosecution's argument. I wouldn't be surprised now to see Rose get off scotch free just due to the inconsistency
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.
Rotten Apple wrote:Rose crazy for thatand its not against the law to celebrate in the court room nor can the jury hold that against the defense
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.
madvillian wrote:Rotten Apple wrote:Rose crazy for thatand its not against the law to celebrate in the court room nor can the jury hold that against the defense
Reminds me of one of the best court room scenes ever, second scene in the Wire...Stringer and his boys show up and intimidate the witness who refuses to confirm the murder. McNulty steps out and as he passes Stringer he says "I'll be chalking you off one day".
Of course he meant it metaphorically, like he'd pin a case on Stringer someday. But it turned out literally, as Stringer (HUGE SPOILER) was of course killed, and then was "chalked off" literally by the police.

trophywinner wrote:postcall wrote:Thanks man I literally just wanted a source to read for myself. I didn't mean to imply anything lol.
i know, i just found it interesting that her testimony is largely based on her background & personality. being timid, naive, non-sexual, almost prudish. yet her texts to rose show her as a freak, deviant, and vulgar. she's crazy.
3toheadmelo wrote:?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
I'll be surprised if rose loses this case at this point