ImageImageImageImageImage

Jalen Brunson obsession

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#401 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Apr 22, 2022 6:25 am

RHODEY wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Welp, expect that bandwagon to get heavy.


It went from, "He's not a starter" to " Im maybe coming around to the idea of..."

This is after dropping 31 and 41 points sans Luka versus Gobert and the pips.. I understand the concept of pride but.... :oops:

BTW I doubt we get him now because the price tag has grown exponentially. So I guess I could settle for Tyus Jones to co pilot with Quickley if we could somehow swing that.


I’m fine with Tyus in that situation. And I think IQ can be just as good, if not better than, Brunson. At least IQ was drafted in the first round and he was the SEC POTY. The grass is always greener around here lol.
User avatar
BBALLER4FR
RealGM
Posts: 19,539
And1: 8,480
Joined: May 05, 2004
Location: Not sure anymore.
   

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#402 » by BBALLER4FR » Fri Apr 22, 2022 6:34 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
dakomish23 wrote:Welp, expect that bandwagon to get heavy.


It went from, "He's not a starter" to " Im maybe coming around to the idea of..."

This is after dropping 31 and 41 points sans Luka versus Gobert and the pips.. I understand the concept of pride but.... :oops:

BTW I doubt we get him now because the price tag has grown exponentially. So I guess I could settle for Tyus Jones to co pilot with Quickley if we could somehow swing that.


I’m fine with Tyus in that situation. And I think IQ can be just as good, if not better than, Brunson. At least IQ was drafted in the first round and he was the SEC POTY. The grass is always greener around here lol.



I can get on board with Brunson based on what I'm seeing and that management is unwilling to grow from within. But the rear view mirror takes are really weird from some of our posters. I guess it's not ok to say "Brunson was just a backup and NOT a PG" but perfectly fine to say "IQ is just a back up and NOT a PG". And now it's the cool thing to say "Brunson should have always been starting but he had the misfortune of being cast as a backup player" but you can never say the same for IQ. It really is a case of their stuff is better than ours.
Karl Anthony-Towms

There goes my hero. He's ordinary.
Oscirus
RealGM
Posts: 13,530
And1: 9,536
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
       

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#403 » by Oscirus » Fri Apr 22, 2022 7:33 am

dallas aint getting rid of brunson anytime soon lolz
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,610
And1: 5,742
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#404 » by spree2kawhi » Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:49 am

My evaluation of Brunson was **** apparently :lol:

But I still think we need to find the face of the franchise before filling out the roster with role players, and he is still a role player after all.
User avatar
NYKnickerbocker
RealGM
Posts: 19,879
And1: 14,280
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
Location: Queens
       

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#405 » by NYKnickerbocker » Fri Apr 22, 2022 10:44 am

Damn he didn’t make a single 3 lol. 3 time DPOY Rudy out there and he was just getting buckets in the paint lmao
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,164
And1: 96,107
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#406 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Apr 22, 2022 12:12 pm

KnicksNext wrote:
Reign23 wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:Knick fans: This team sucks
Knick fans when any attempt to upgrade the team is brought up: That guy isn't good enough for the Knicks.

every.single.time.


Yes, this pretty much sums up our Knicks fans. No player is ever good enough to go after, and the 'youth' we have is always significantly overrated. It's boring and tiresome.

If we want to get better, we need better players. Our current roster is not built to win a damn thing. I honestly don't get it, but this happens year after year. Posters propose good/great players to add, but then when they realize we have to give up something to get something, the posts then move to a lot of quotes like: 'X player is not that good, X player is too old, X player doesn't fit our roster, I won't give up RJ/Obi/Quick etc. for X player.

It's too much. Bla bla bla. Same sh*t year after year. Doesn't anyone want to actually field a consistently winning team? If we don't make some significant upgrades in the offseason (i.e: Trade some of our youth for a good/great player, or multiple good/great players), we're locked into 25-35 win squads for the foreseeable future.


It's always the mixed bag of extremes. The young players suck or are great! Yet somehow, other players aren't good enough.

I don't care how the FO does it. I could care less who they trade anymore. Yeah, I don't want to see a "good" team of 7 35 year olds that sucks after 2 seasons and the team is capped out for 3 after, but besides that, don't really care which youth stay, which go, which vets might acquired, or not, who is drafted. Just, like, try to make the team good and semi sustainable (which for the Knicks is 3 years) for once.
Image
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,164
And1: 96,107
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#407 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Apr 22, 2022 12:25 pm

Deeeez Knicks wrote:Another classic Grant Hill case where knicks are used to drive up the price. I'm ok with that just to make Dallas pay more. That's all we got. We should hang jerseys for all the times we were Grant Hill'd


Chris Webber's jersey retired first
Image
User avatar
Kampuchea
RealGM
Posts: 11,346
And1: 9,290
Joined: Oct 20, 2010
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
       

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#408 » by Kampuchea » Fri Apr 22, 2022 12:49 pm

Let's bring in Brunson and bring back Mitch plus re-sign RJ to the max.

Brunson - $30mil
RJ - $35mil
Fournier - $18mil
Randle - $29mil
Mitch - $18mil

That is $130Mil, the salary CAP is $122mil next season. We should be able to go over the cap to fill out the roster.

FORMIDABLE
Image
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,592
And1: 6,483
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#409 » by 8516knicks » Fri Apr 22, 2022 1:19 pm

Kampuchea wrote:Let's bring in Brunson and bring back Mitch plus re-sign RJ to the max.

Brunson - $30mil
RJ - $35mil
Fournier - $18mil
Randle - $29mil
Mitch - $18mil

That is $130Mil, the salary CAP is $122mil next season. We should be able to go over the cap to fill out the roster.

FORMIDABLE


That $18M for Fournier sticks out like a sore thumb. (Maybe a sore thumb is why he only shows up every few games?) :cry: :roll:
User avatar
Kampuchea
RealGM
Posts: 11,346
And1: 9,290
Joined: Oct 20, 2010
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
       

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#410 » by Kampuchea » Fri Apr 22, 2022 1:24 pm

8516knicks wrote:
Kampuchea wrote:Let's bring in Brunson and bring back Mitch plus re-sign RJ to the max.

Brunson - $30mil
RJ - $35mil
Fournier - $18mil
Randle - $29mil
Mitch - $18mil

That is $130Mil, the salary CAP is $122mil next season. We should be able to go over the cap to fill out the roster.

FORMIDABLE


That $18M for Fournier sticks out like a sore thumb. (Maybe a sore thumb is why he only shows up every few games?) :cry: :roll:


Yeah, I don't like that $18million. It seems weird as the only one not overpaid. We should bump him to $23M+
Image
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,015
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#411 » by Chanel Bomber » Fri Apr 22, 2022 1:41 pm

Kampuchea wrote:
8516knicks wrote:
Kampuchea wrote:Let's bring in Brunson and bring back Mitch plus re-sign RJ to the max.

Brunson - $30mil
RJ - $35mil
Fournier - $18mil
Randle - $29mil
Mitch - $18mil

That is $130Mil, the salary CAP is $122mil next season. We should be able to go over the cap to fill out the roster.

FORMIDABLE


That $18M for Fournier sticks out like a sore thumb. (Maybe a sore thumb is why he only shows up every few games?) :cry: :roll:


Yeah, I don't like that $18million. It seems weird as the only one not overpaid. We should bump him to $23M+

I agree. Seems reasonable.

MJ Burks deserves his money too so I say we renegociate his contract and give him approximately the same amount as RJ and Randle over 4 years. Just to reward the high bar he's setting for his teammates in terms of TS.
User avatar
RHODEY
RealGM
Posts: 25,299
And1: 22,812
Joined: May 18, 2007
Location: Straight out of a comic book

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#412 » by RHODEY » Fri Apr 22, 2022 3:17 pm

BBALLER4FR wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
RHODEY wrote:
It went from, "He's not a starter" to " Im maybe coming around to the idea of..."

This is after dropping 31 and 41 points sans Luka versus Gobert and the pips.. I understand the concept of pride but.... :oops:

BTW I doubt we get him now because the price tag has grown exponentially. So I guess I could settle for Tyus Jones to co pilot with Quickley if we could somehow swing that.


I’m fine with Tyus in that situation. And I think IQ can be just as good, if not better than, Brunson. At least IQ was drafted in the first round and he was the SEC POTY. The grass is always greener around here lol.



I can get on board with Brunson based on what I'm seeing and that management is unwilling to grow from within. But the rear view mirror takes are really weird from some of our posters. I guess it's not ok to say "Brunson was just a backup and NOT a PG" but perfectly fine to say "IQ is just a back up and NOT a PG". And now it's the cool thing to say "Brunson should have always been starting but he had the misfortune of being cast as a backup player" but you can never say the same for IQ. It really is a case of their stuff is better than ours.


I dont think it has to be one or the other I think Brunson AND IQ would fit the bill. I'm in that camp. Also some of us touted Brunson well before this playoff mini run.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,164
And1: 96,107
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#413 » by thebuzzardman » Fri Apr 22, 2022 3:45 pm

Buzztrodamus time.

Brunson 100% will be a Knick.

Randle was at the game with Perry and Co to recruit him, though he's already back channel indicated he wants to come
Randle included to make Randle feel important.

Feel free to construct trades that work with Mitch, Fournier, Burks, Walker, Bertrans, etc etc.

It's happening
Image
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 15,387
And1: 7,951
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#414 » by sol537 » Fri Apr 22, 2022 3:59 pm

I always liked Brunson even from his college days. I wanted him for us in that draft as a 7th man off the bench type because he's a clear winning player. I'm hoping his dad can convince him to angle his way to NYK. Though I'd imagine he'll stay in DAL just because they gave him the opportunity to blossom.

Still, I'd shed MRob or Randle for Brunson without thinking twice. Brunson + IQ/Grimes + RJ + Obi is the start of something pretty nice.
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,357
And1: 56,908
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#415 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:19 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:My evaluation of Brunson was **** apparently :lol:

But I still think we need to find the face of the franchise before filling out the roster with role players, and he is still a role player after all.





He's not "just a roleplayer" there's a 20ppg scorer with the amount of touches he'd get here, he's not a franchise tier 1 type of player but he's also not simply a roleplayer, roleplayers don't lead their teams to playoff wins when the main guy is out. He's a highly efficient scoring PG that could make a couple all-star games in the right situation.
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,949
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#416 » by seren » Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:28 pm

Brunson’s trajectory is similar to Van Vleet so far. Fred signed a 4/85 two years ago. Given the increase in salary cap since then, I would think something around 4/100 is what it will take at the least. Dallas can give him a fifth year as well. Maybe 5/130. Depending on what is out there, he may even get closer to max from a team under the cap. Detroit perhaps
User avatar
sol537
RealGM
Posts: 15,387
And1: 7,951
Joined: Nov 07, 2001

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#417 » by sol537 » Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:30 pm

4yrs $84 seems about right. Let's see what he does the rest of the playoffs. Utah sure is making him look good with their horrible defenders.
User avatar
Reign23
RealGM
Posts: 11,769
And1: 12,604
Joined: Dec 29, 2014
Location: Germany.
   

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#418 » by Reign23 » Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:41 pm

if we can't get him I would definitely look to offer Tyus Jones the MLE. he looks awesome tbh
formerly known as knickst4pe
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,546
And1: 62,686
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#419 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri Apr 22, 2022 5:03 pm

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:My evaluation of Brunson was **** apparently :lol:

But I still think we need to find the face of the franchise before filling out the roster with role players, and he is still a role player after all.


He's not "just a roleplayer" there's a 20ppg scorer with the amount of touches he'd get here, he's not a franchise tier 1 type of player but he's also not simply a roleplayer, roleplayers don't lead their teams to playoff wins when the main guy is out. He's a highly efficient scoring PG that could make a couple all-star games in the right situation.


He’s the lefty FVV
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,357
And1: 56,908
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: Jalen Brunson obsession 

Post#420 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Fri Apr 22, 2022 5:07 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:My evaluation of Brunson was **** apparently :lol:

But I still think we need to find the face of the franchise before filling out the roster with role players, and he is still a role player after all.


He's not "just a roleplayer" there's a 20ppg scorer with the amount of touches he'd get here, he's not a franchise tier 1 type of player but he's also not simply a roleplayer, roleplayers don't lead their teams to playoff wins when the main guy is out. He's a highly efficient scoring PG that could make a couple all-star games in the right situation.


He’s the lefty FVV


He has more potential than Fred, cause he scores at the rim and mid-range, he's better at self creation.

Return to New York Knicks