god shammgod wrote:saying ihart is the better rebounder/defender is like saying obi would end up better than randle. nobody would say something so ridic...oh wait lol

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully
god shammgod wrote:saying ihart is the better rebounder/defender is like saying obi would end up better than randle. nobody would say something so ridic...oh wait lol


aggo wrote:I wonder if mitch worked on his FTs?


thebuzzardman wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
That means he's not playing, but it sounds nice.
Wait, Stuporman told me none of the injured players would play in any of these "laugher" games.
I guess his ability to read the future completely correctly only applies to past draft picks, once they are on a good streak.
?
Im Coming Home wrote:aggo wrote:I wonder if mitch worked on his FTs?
No shot. He's only gotten worse through the years.
god shammgod wrote:not only is shart a better defender than mitch, he's better than rudy gobert because of these stats. he's also better than og by the way. listen closely....you are not serious individuals.
Im Coming Home wrote:Shams probably smoking a whole pack of newports at once to celebrate.


god shammgod wrote:not only is shart a better defender than mitch, he's better than rudy gobert because of these stats. he's also better than og by the way. listen closely....you are not serious individuals.
?aggo wrote:I wonder if mitch worked on his FTs?

god shammgod wrote:not only is shart a better defender than mitch, he's better than rudy gobert because of these stats. he's also better than og by the way. listen closely....you are not serious individuals.
stuporman wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
That means he's not playing, but it sounds nice.
Wait, Stuporman told me none of the injured players would play in any of these "laugher" games.
I guess his ability to read the future completely correctly only applies to past draft picks, once they are on a good streak.
I said Mitch was the one that could come back during these laugher games...I guess your ability to read the present moment sentences someone writes only applies to trolling posts so I write this one that way in hopes you can read it.

stuporman wrote:god shammgod wrote:not only is shart a better defender than mitch, he's better than rudy gobert because of these stats. he's also better than og by the way. listen closely....you are not serious individuals.
The one stat they neglect to include is with Mitch starting the Knicks were a top 5 defense and when he went down and iHart starting the Knicks were a bottom 5 defense. It was only after OG came did the Knicks all of a sudden become a better defensive team again.
I will be fair though, iHart has played good enough defense lately that the team defense hasn't dropped off that much after OG went out. Of course, you know that Mitch working himself back into game shape will be a perfect excuse to say he's not as good now for the people who are his haters.

stuporman wrote:god shammgod wrote:not only is shart a better defender than mitch, he's better than rudy gobert because of these stats. he's also better than og by the way. listen closely....you are not serious individuals.
The one stat they neglect to include is with Mitch starting the Knicks were a top 5 defense and when he went down and iHart starting the Knicks were a bottom 5 defense. It was only after OG came did the Knicks all of a sudden become a better defensive team again.
I will be fair though, iHart has played good enough defense lately that the team defense hasn't dropped off that much after OG went out. Of course, you know that Mitch working himself back into game shape will be a perfect excuse to say he's not as good now for the people who are his haters.