HerSports85 wrote:i mean things could be worse ... the Bucks lost again. Sheeesh
Bet money they beat us Friday
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
HerSports85 wrote:i mean things could be worse ... the Bucks lost again. Sheeesh

The KnicksFix wrote:whocares1 wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:This dumba** coach runs KAT in drop coverage
EVERY. SINGLE. NIGHT.
That’s not even a top 5 reason the Knicks lost tonight so I don’t get the point in even mentioning it.
It adds up when you let guys walk into the damn paint. Did you watch the game?
Or perhaps you like how soft he is on defense? Should i mention how Brunson is often tunnel vision? Or that deuce was ice cold and so was bridges? Or maybe you’d like the fact the kat can’t guard a damn tree and if he would stop playing drop coverage and press up then those ball handlers dont attack him with a head of steam, or ready to post.
Drop coverage matters, get a clue, rook.
3toheadmelo wrote:robillionaire wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:
His tunnel vision is a serious issue!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And idk if it can be fixed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We should look to move him for Lamelo this summer
6-15 FG with 2 assists down by 23 points right now against Minnesota
Capn'O wrote:Gravy wrote:The bench is jus too thin right now. They probably win if Cam Payne plays or Deuce hits a shot.
He just doesn't trust the rooks yet. It's pretty frustrating.
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What's happening with Brunson on offense is easy to see, if you have the right personnel you can take away his post ups and mismatches. If you have two good wing defenders you can put your center on Hart, your physically strongest defender on KAT and then you put your quickest/best defender on Brunson. He cannot post up some of these jumbo sized wings, so that takes away a weapon, and if you try and get KAT involved in the screen they will switch it so he has to go against a good perimeter defender instead of the C which is where he mismatch hunts, and third if you call for a screen with Hart they don't care about what he does. The C guarding Hart will roam and blow up offense all over the place, this has been a theme all season for teams with the personnel to do it.
This gets Tom into the trap of trying to post up KAT, which looks like a mismatch but kills ball movement and the C helping off Hart will be everywhere.
The best way to get around this would be to use KAT more like how we used IHart, but for whatever reason we have not really tried to use him as a hub passer. That will give Hart the edge on the C guarding him and open up cuts, ball movement etc, it's how our offense worked last year from Jan into the playoffs.
whocares1 wrote:Jalen Bluntson wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Sims is a volleyball player
There was ZERO reason not to play Hukporti. People out here blaming Brunson for the loss when him and OG were the only reason the game was even close.
Hart was good too. Honestly Sims was a net positive in the minutes he was out there. Did he make some mistakes sure, but if anything he was just a small part of the problems of tonight but most of them are fixable with time.
Clyde_Style wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What's happening with Brunson on offense is easy to see, if you have the right personnel you can take away his post ups and mismatches. If you have two good wing defenders you can put your center on Hart, your physically strongest defender on KAT and then you put your quickest/best defender on Brunson. He cannot post up some of these jumbo sized wings, so that takes away a weapon, and if you try and get KAT involved in the screen they will switch it so he has to go against a good perimeter defender instead of the C which is where he mismatch hunts, and third if you call for a screen with Hart they don't care about what he does. The C guarding Hart will roam and blow up offense all over the place, this has been a theme all season for teams with the personnel to do it.
This gets Tom into the trap of trying to post up KAT, which looks like a mismatch but kills ball movement and the C helping off Hart will be everywhere.
The best way to get around this would be to use KAT more like how we used IHart, but for whatever reason we have not really tried to use him as a hub passer. That will give Hart the edge on the C guarding him and open up cuts, ball movement etc, it's how our offense worked last year from Jan into the playoffs.
TheGreenArrow wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:robillionaire wrote:
We should look to move him for Lamelo this summer
6-15 FG with 2 assists down by 23 points right now against Minnesota
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g

Guano wrote:Capn'O wrote:Gravy wrote:The bench is jus too thin right now. They probably win if Cam Payne plays or Deuce hits a shot.
He just doesn't trust the rooks yet. It's pretty frustrating.
it's so bad that when og does rest we question if he is injured
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:What's happening with Brunson on offense is easy to see, if you have the right personnel you can take away his post ups and mismatches. If you have two good wing defenders you can put your center on Hart, your physically strongest defender on KAT and then you put your quickest/best defender on Brunson. He cannot post up some of these jumbo sized wings, so that takes away a weapon, and if you try and get KAT involved in the screen they will switch it so he has to go against a good perimeter defender instead of the C which is where he mismatch hunts, and third if you call for a screen with Hart they don't care about what he does. The C guarding Hart will roam and blow up offense all over the place, this has been a theme all season for teams with the personnel to do it.
This gets Tom into the trap of trying to post up KAT, which looks like a mismatch but kills ball movement and the C helping off Hart will be everywhere.
The best way to get around this would be to use KAT more like how we used IHart, but for whatever reason we have not really tried to use him as a hub passer. That will give Hart the edge on the C guarding him and open up cuts, ball movement etc, it's how our offense worked last year from Jan into the playoffs.
Gravy wrote:Guano wrote:Capn'O wrote:
He just doesn't trust the rooks yet. It's pretty frustrating.
it's so bad that when og does rest we question if he is injured
I dont know who OGs sub is supposed to be, thats how much we dont have a bench lol
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
3toheadmelo wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:6-15 FG with 2 assists down by 23 points right now against Minnesota
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
robillionaire wrote:Bridges was also quite bad. Total non-factor for the 5 FRP man.
OG was great though.
TheGreenArrow wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Nobody’s “clamping” Lamelo like Amen did to Brunson tonight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If we had Lamelo instead of brunson we would’ve won this game by double digits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But that’s a conversation this board isn’t ready to have yet so I digress!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TheGreenArrow wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:robillionaire wrote:
We should look to move him for Lamelo this summer
6-15 FG with 2 assists down by 23 points right now against Minnesota
?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g