ImageImageImageImageImage

OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!!

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#801 » by Fury » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:37 pm

Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?


Mods troll in that thread so here we are.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#802 » by Thugger HBC » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:37 pm

Falstaffxx wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:
Again with "second round picks" don't matter. Yet second round picks were required for the trades for these players that are supposedly good acquisitions, like Kidd and Camby.

I didn't say they won't contribute, I said they aren't impact players. Yet we brought them in as if we are rounding out our roster for a title run, when we have not chance, while getting rid of the one player who could have helped now AND been a building block for the future. Self-destrucive, senseless management that continues the Knicks' cycle of futility. Every time, we try to rationalize it. I've been there rationalizing it every time along with everyone else. But this is one time too many, and just too blantant, to be ignored.



I don't necessarily disagree with you, but this applies to Dwight Howard going to the Lakers...how?


Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.

They're only a problem if we make the finals.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,008
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#803 » by GONYK » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:38 pm

Falstaffxx wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:
Again with "second round picks" don't matter. Yet second round picks were required for the trades for these players that are supposedly good acquisitions, like Kidd and Camby.

I didn't say they won't contribute, I said they aren't impact players. Yet we brought them in as if we are rounding out our roster for a title run, when we have not chance, while getting rid of the one player who could have helped now AND been a building block for the future. Self-destrucive, senseless management that continues the Knicks' cycle of futility. Every time, we try to rationalize it. I've been there rationalizing it every time along with everyone else. But this is one time too many, and just too blantant, to be ignored.



I don't necessarily disagree with you, but this applies to Dwight Howard going to the Lakers...how?


Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.


So it doesn't apply. Ok.

Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.
Knicker23
General Manager
Posts: 9,524
And1: 139
Joined: Apr 24, 2010

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#804 » by Knicker23 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:39 pm

knicksnyk wrote:

y dont we worry about getting out of the first round first before we start talking about making it to the ECF.


Yep, one step at a time. Still doesn't change the fact that we have just as good a shot, if not better, than every other team in the east, outside of Heat, to make the ECF.. Hardly something that could ever be described as "doomed"
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#805 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:39 pm

Fury wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?


Mods troll in that thread so here we are.


Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.

This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.
User avatar
SonOfMars
RealGM
Posts: 13,822
And1: 2,741
Joined: Mar 02, 2011
 

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#806 » by SonOfMars » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:40 pm

How about we talk about the Lakers-Nuggets-Magic-Sixers trade

Image
Image
Props Turbo_Zone
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#807 » by Fury » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:40 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
Fury wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?


Mods troll in that thread so here we are.


Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.

This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.


Dude, you trolled in there and now mad that people are discussing it in here?

And how am I derailing? This is a Knick board, and this trade proves Knick management is ****.
Falstaffxx
Banned User
Posts: 9,153
And1: 165
Joined: Sep 27, 2010

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#808 » by Falstaffxx » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:40 pm

GONYK wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.


So it doesn't apply. Ok.

Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.


You take an explanation for why it does matter and then just say "okay so it doesn't matter." In an environment where there are 3 teams you have almost no chance to beat ahead you in the title chase, and you have a player who both gives you your best chance now and is also one your only long-term building blocks, and you throw that away...this is all interconnected.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,638
And1: 137,515
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#809 » by god shammgod » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:40 pm

dwight being a laker is better then dwight being a net and those were the only 2 realistic options. which one is better for the knicks ?
Falstaffxx
Banned User
Posts: 9,153
And1: 165
Joined: Sep 27, 2010

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#810 » by Falstaffxx » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:41 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
Fury wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?


Mods troll in that thread so here we are.


Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.

This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.


Seriously, we're not supposed to "complain" about the state of this franchise?...whatever.
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#811 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:41 pm

Fury wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
Fury wrote:
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.


Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.

This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.


Dude, you trolled in there and now mad that people are discussing it in here?


And I stopped. So this is your warning. STOP.

TO EVERYONE




THIS IS A DWIGHT HOWARD TRADE THREAD. EITHER TALK ABOUT IT IN HERE, OR LEAVE. THIS IS NOT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE KNICKS.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#812 » by Fury » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:41 pm

god shammgod wrote:dwight being a laker is better then dwight being a net and those were the only 2 realistic options. which one is better for the knicks ?


Stop derailing man.
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#813 » by Thugger HBC » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:41 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
Fury wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?


Mods troll in that thread so here we are.


Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.

This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.

Do it, that thread is a Knicks embarrassment anyway.

Sorry Moo, but that thread makes the entire fanbase look worse.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 67,008
And1: 45,778
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#814 » by GONYK » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 pm

Falstaffxx wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.


So it doesn't apply. Ok.

Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.


You take an explanation for why it does matter and then just say "okay so it doesn't matter." In an environment where there are 3 teams you have almost no change to beat ahead you in the title chase, and you have a player who both gives you your best chance now and is also one your only long-term building blocks, and you throw that away...this is all interconnected.


No, it's not.

We have a chance to beat OKC, the Lakers, and Miami.

The moves those teams make do not directly affect us. All we can do is build the best team we can. Period.

Let's worry about making the Finals before we start complaining about the Lakers.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,252
And1: 25,712
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#815 » by moocow007 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 pm

Falstaffxx wrote:
moocow007 wrote:
Falstaffxx wrote:Are you saying the Knicks aren't doomed? What's the definition of "not doomed" then? I don't think we're even close to being in the discussion for a championship, and we just let our best young player walk for nothing, while rounding out the roster with old vets who aren't impact players. Were are in draft-pick debt, and our one young up-and-comer is going to be coming off a major injury. We'll be a +.500 team, and if everything clicks we might even be a 50 win team. But that's about it, and then we are rebuilding in 3 years. I guess it just depends on what the definition of "doomed" is.


Doomed implies that you are first destined for something. Which again, goes right into what fans of other teams criticize about the Knick fans...when they act like they deserve something and, when they don't get it, get robbed of it. NY is no more destined for anything than any other team. And, as a result, it isn't doomed anymore than any other team.

So because we're not championship locks were doomed?

Old vets that aren't impact players? Kidd and Camby may not be their former star selfs but they hardly are useless.

Draft pick debt? We have no 2nd round picks (wow). We have dealt 2 1st round picks during a stretch that the Knicks will still be among the better teams in the NBA (wow).

So we're going to be a pretty good team is what you're saying and that = doomed?

YOu just answered you're own overreaction question yourself.


Again with "second round picks" don't matter. Yet second round picks were required for the trades for these players that are supposedly good acquisitions, like Kidd and Camby.

I didn't say they won't contribute, I said they aren't impact players. Yet we brought them in as if we are rounding out our roster for a title run, when we have not chance, while getting rid of the one player who could have helped now AND been a building block for the future. Self-destrucive, senseless management that continues the Knicks' cycle of futility. Every time, we try to rationalize it. I've been there rationalizing it every time along with everyone else. But this is one time too many, and just too blantant, to be ignored.


2nd round picks weren't involved in the Kidd signing so not sure what you're talking about here. The Mavericks wanted more than just 2nd round picks (see how much they are viewed as desirable?)...why? cause they actually wanted him back. The Blazers weren't interested in Camby back at all...ergo why they were willing to trade him for a 2nd round pick AND to swap a much more useful Jared Jeffries for Kurt Thomas.

And how do you know they wont be impact players? What's an impact player? 20/10? The Knicks weren't getting those for 2nd round picks and no capspace.

Rationalize about what? What exactly are we rationalizing? That we didn't trade for HOward? We didn't have the assets along with roughly 28 other teams...to trade for him. So what are we rationalizing? Should it be the same rationalization that the other 28 teams that would have LOVED to have him should be rationalizing right now?

This is about rationalizing, it's about overreating...again.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#816 » by Fury » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:42 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
And I stopped. So this is your warning. STOP.


THIS IS A DWIGHT HOWARD TRADE THREAD. EITHER TALK ABOUT IT IN HERE, OR LEAVE. THIS IS NOT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE KNICKS.


You trolled in there for a lot of days. Quite the double standard.

I didn't derail anything in this thread.
knicksnyk
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,708
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 12, 2012

Re: OT: Dwight A Laker Soon? [Woj] 

Post#817 » by knicksnyk » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:43 pm

GONYK wrote:
So it doesn't apply. Ok.

Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.


you don't get it. it isn't a houston vs knicks thing this is a knicks vs knicks thing. we are our own worst enemy. does comparing yourself to a team that is undergoing a rebuilding process make you feel better about the dumb decisions that management has made. get it together.
User avatar
SonOfMars
RealGM
Posts: 13,822
And1: 2,741
Joined: Mar 02, 2011
 

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#818 » by SonOfMars » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:44 pm

Man, I think Iguodala is going to do wonders for the Nuggets :D
Image
Props Turbo_Zone
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#819 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:44 pm

Fury wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
And I stopped. So this is your warning. STOP.


THIS IS A DWIGHT HOWARD TRADE THREAD. EITHER TALK ABOUT IT IN HERE, OR LEAVE. THIS IS NOT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE KNICKS.


You trolled in there for a lot of days. Quite the double standard.



Seriously, do not push me. You already know how much that thread pisses me off and, as thugger says, I believe is an embarrassment. Go troll the Knicks in there. NOT here.

This is the last time I respond to your post on this matter. STOP.
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,725
And1: 18,724
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: OFFICIAL: Dwight A Laker NOT a Net WHeee!!! 

Post#820 » by Fury » Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:44 pm

Hey guys, Josh McRoberts is in this trade! That is should get this convo going.

Return to New York Knicks