Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?

Falstaffxx wrote:GONYK wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:
Again with "second round picks" don't matter. Yet second round picks were required for the trades for these players that are supposedly good acquisitions, like Kidd and Camby.
I didn't say they won't contribute, I said they aren't impact players. Yet we brought them in as if we are rounding out our roster for a title run, when we have not chance, while getting rid of the one player who could have helped now AND been a building block for the future. Self-destrucive, senseless management that continues the Knicks' cycle of futility. Every time, we try to rationalize it. I've been there rationalizing it every time along with everyone else. But this is one time too many, and just too blantant, to be ignored.
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but this applies to Dwight Howard going to the Lakers...how?
Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.

Falstaffxx wrote:GONYK wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:
Again with "second round picks" don't matter. Yet second round picks were required for the trades for these players that are supposedly good acquisitions, like Kidd and Camby.
I didn't say they won't contribute, I said they aren't impact players. Yet we brought them in as if we are rounding out our roster for a title run, when we have not chance, while getting rid of the one player who could have helped now AND been a building block for the future. Self-destrucive, senseless management that continues the Knicks' cycle of futility. Every time, we try to rationalize it. I've been there rationalizing it every time along with everyone else. But this is one time too many, and just too blantant, to be ignored.
I don't necessarily disagree with you, but this applies to Dwight Howard going to the Lakers...how?
Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.
knicksnyk wrote:
y dont we worry about getting out of the first round first before we start talking about making it to the ECF.
Fury wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.


Knickstape1214 wrote:Fury wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.
Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.
This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.
GONYK wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.
So it doesn't apply. Ok.
Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.
Knickstape1214 wrote:Fury wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.
Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.
This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.
Fury wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:Fury wrote:
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.
Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.
This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.
Dude, you trolled in there and now mad that people are discussing it in here?
god shammgod wrote:dwight being a laker is better then dwight being a net and those were the only 2 realistic options. which one is better for the knicks ?

Knickstape1214 wrote:Fury wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I thought the stickied thread on top was for this Knicks management bitch fest?
Mods troll in that thread so here we are.
Then I'll just remove it? If it's not serving its purpose, there is no need for it. Go complain in there. NOT here.
This is your only warning. If you do not stop, you will be suspended for derailing.

Falstaffxx wrote:GONYK wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:Just one more team to make this supposed "win now" run that much more futile.
So it doesn't apply. Ok.
Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.
You take an explanation for why it does matter and then just say "okay so it doesn't matter." In an environment where there are 3 teams you have almost no change to beat ahead you in the title chase, and you have a player who both gives you your best chance now and is also one your only long-term building blocks, and you throw that away...this is all interconnected.

Falstaffxx wrote:moocow007 wrote:Falstaffxx wrote:Are you saying the Knicks aren't doomed? What's the definition of "not doomed" then? I don't think we're even close to being in the discussion for a championship, and we just let our best young player walk for nothing, while rounding out the roster with old vets who aren't impact players. Were are in draft-pick debt, and our one young up-and-comer is going to be coming off a major injury. We'll be a +.500 team, and if everything clicks we might even be a 50 win team. But that's about it, and then we are rebuilding in 3 years. I guess it just depends on what the definition of "doomed" is.
Doomed implies that you are first destined for something. Which again, goes right into what fans of other teams criticize about the Knick fans...when they act like they deserve something and, when they don't get it, get robbed of it. NY is no more destined for anything than any other team. And, as a result, it isn't doomed anymore than any other team.
So because we're not championship locks were doomed?
Old vets that aren't impact players? Kidd and Camby may not be their former star selfs but they hardly are useless.
Draft pick debt? We have no 2nd round picks (wow). We have dealt 2 1st round picks during a stretch that the Knicks will still be among the better teams in the NBA (wow).
So we're going to be a pretty good team is what you're saying and that = doomed?
YOu just answered you're own overreaction question yourself.
Again with "second round picks" don't matter. Yet second round picks were required for the trades for these players that are supposedly good acquisitions, like Kidd and Camby.
I didn't say they won't contribute, I said they aren't impact players. Yet we brought them in as if we are rounding out our roster for a title run, when we have not chance, while getting rid of the one player who could have helped now AND been a building block for the future. Self-destrucive, senseless management that continues the Knicks' cycle of futility. Every time, we try to rationalize it. I've been there rationalizing it every time along with everyone else. But this is one time too many, and just too blantant, to be ignored.
Knickstape1214 wrote:
And I stopped. So this is your warning. STOP.
THIS IS A DWIGHT HOWARD TRADE THREAD. EITHER TALK ABOUT IT IN HERE, OR LEAVE. THIS IS NOT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE KNICKS.
GONYK wrote:
So it doesn't apply. Ok.
Look, letting Lin go was a bad move, but I'd rather be the Knicks than the Rockets right now.

Fury wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:
And I stopped. So this is your warning. STOP.
THIS IS A DWIGHT HOWARD TRADE THREAD. EITHER TALK ABOUT IT IN HERE, OR LEAVE. THIS IS NOT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE KNICKS.
You trolled in there for a lot of days. Quite the double standard.