Depends on what those picks are.
Id give up IQ instead of Obi and then thats a pretty fair trade I suppose.
Brunson / Rose
Mitchell
RJ / Cam
Randle / Obi
Robinson / Hart
Thats a solid 9 man rotation. Rokas, Sims, and McBride waiting in the wings.
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36
AusKnicksTape wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:I truly do not understand how Randle is going to work with Brunson and Mitchell. RJ needs touches too.
They really wanted Brunson, but in order to pair him with Mitchell? Really? I call BS
This is an ad hoc situation fueled by lust for a star, but none of this was planned. Sure, you can say we didn’t know Ainge was going into full rebuild mode in Utah, but our FO probably knew he was going that direction before the Gobert trade and before they signed Brunson.
The only clear plan was they wanted Brunson and they got him.
I’m not even opposed to trading for Mitchell, but how TF are you going to make Randle work in that line-up? YOU WON’T. He will be a disaster. But, yeah, ignore the issue and pretend our roster will be golden. It won’t. Mitchell might be great, but we have a serious roster construction problem with guys wanting touches and it is not resolvable. You can’t convince me Randle will willinglhy play a mostly off the ball game now and take a back seat to the backcourt. He’s going to pout and turn the locker room into a cesspool
This. If someones open to starting a thread for thoughts on how to make this work i'd be keen to hear. I know this thread is predominately targeted at the trade discussions but i'd love to see the hypotheticals on what happens in the event that Mitchell signs and RJ and Randle stay.
I genuinely don't see how it can work without RJ's development getting smashed and at that point if you're not focusing on RJ why would you be desperate to hold onto him. There's got to be some front office oversight here as Leon has shown that he looks after his own so they're not about to downgrade Brunson's role here. Brunson isn't getting traded in 6 months when he's eligible too.
Maybe they're thinking they'll move Randle at the deadline? I just cant't see how this works long term. I understand why Utah wouldn't want Randle but I can't understand why the Knicks are reportedly still so high on keeping him (if that is true of course)?
Spida's going to get his. Brunson is clearly going to get his since that was their big sell to him. RJ needs to get his otherwise whats the point.

god shammgod wrote:mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:
you put those guys together in their prime and you aint getting out of the 2nd round either
and we were the 11th worst record with a horrendous season...we aren't bottoming out with Brunson and Mitchell...those picks will be mid teens to 20's.
This is what they were accumulating all these picks to do...trade them. They weren't planning on drafting anyone.
if all those picks convey, how many rookies would we have next year ?
EricAnderson wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:Reign23 wrote:m2 bro. absolutely.
but when a 25 year old multiple all star becomes available you have to strike..
No you don't.
The Celtics passed on trading Brown for PG13 after his rookie year, turned out fine for them.
It turned out fine because of how good he became.
Odds are extremely slim that any of our young guys will be as good as Jaylen Brown
whocares1 wrote:El Poochio wrote:Brunson Mitchell Randle team have so many deficiencies lol where do you start fixing that
More importantly, how does RJ fit into the offensive system with these three on the court with him? Is he going to be content with being a floor spacer bc they aren’t running the offense through 4 people.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:whocares1 wrote:El Poochio wrote:Brunson Mitchell Randle team have so many deficiencies lol where do you start fixing that
More importantly, how does RJ fit into the offensive system with these three on the court with him? Is he going to be content with being a floor spacer bc they aren’t running the offense through 4 people.
who cares how RJ fits into that system. he's going to be the 4th best player on that team, don't be so concerned.
honestly, he's a great kid, and appears to be really low maintenance. he'll be fine getting his occasional touches and standing in the corner. he can be our little andrew wiggins

god shammgod wrote:the people thinking keeping obi is a priority are really buying into the last couple of weeks way too much. with the guys we have, you need him to play d and hit the 3 and he was no better at julius last year at those things and he played against backups. he needed that last month just to shoot the same lousy percentage from 3 as julius.
Clyde_Style wrote:Last thought on Randle. The man does not GAF about winning. He would pout during our victories if something went against his own personal interests during a game. Conversely, he’d often be all smiles and chirpy after a loss if he had big numbers. The guy is an effing loser.
If you want to bring in Mitchell, you better have a plan for getting Randle off this squad or chit is going to get ugly here. Randle is a time bomb. He is incapable of sharing the spotlight. When RJ took over the leadership role Randle went into a funk he never recovered from. He will loathe the attention Mitchell gets. Ignore at your own peril

prophet_of_rage wrote:Spida is not a pg.Orange Mamba wrote:Since when did having two playmaking guards become a bad thing? Brunson showed he could play off the ball well in Dallas too. and DM is a willing passer
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk

mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:the people thinking keeping obi is a priority are really buying into the last couple of weeks way too much. with the guys we have, you need him to play d and hit the 3 and he was no better at julius last year at those things and he played against backups. he needed that last month just to shoot the same lousy percentage from 3 as julius.
we will just bring back melo anyway
The Jazz wanted the Knicks to send six first-round picks, in addition to Quentin Grimes, Immanuel Quickley and Obi Toppin.

Kidknick! wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:Last thought on Randle. The man does not GAF about winning. He would pout during our victories if something went against his own personal interests during a game. Conversely, he’d often be all smiles and chirpy after a loss if he had big numbers. The guy is an effing loser.
If you want to bring in Mitchell, you better have a plan for getting Randle off this squad or chit is going to get ugly here. Randle is a time bomb. Ignore at your own peril
Facts, Randle was the WORST Knick teammate I have ever seen in my 30+ years of Knicks fandom. He's garbage. And now imagine his behavior to becoming possibly the FOURTH option behind Mitchell, RJ and Brunson. This is a recipe for disaster. Man couldn't even handle the occasional good Founier game.
god shammgod wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:whocares1 wrote:
More importantly, how does RJ fit into the offensive system with these three on the court with him? Is he going to be content with being a floor spacer bc they aren’t running the offense through 4 people.
who cares how RJ fits into that system. he's going to be the 4th best player on that team, don't be so concerned.
honestly, he's a great kid, and appears to be really low maintenance. he'll be fine getting his occasional touches and standing in the corner. he can be our little andrew wiggins
he's got some work to do to play d like wiggins. i doubt he can. he aint that kind of athlete.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:whocares1 wrote:El Poochio wrote:Brunson Mitchell Randle team have so many deficiencies lol where do you start fixing that
More importantly, how does RJ fit into the offensive system with these three on the court with him? Is he going to be content with being a floor spacer bc they aren’t running the offense through 4 people.
who cares how RJ fits into that system. he's going to be the 4th best player on that team, don't be so concerned.
honestly, he's a great kid, and appears to be really low maintenance. he'll be fine getting his occasional touches and standing in the corner. he can be our little andrew wiggins

Deeeez Knicks wrote:It’ll be a tough climb for the Knicks whether they do or don’t make the trade. They are probably set up better to make the deal, consolidate a bunch of assets and get a legit top 20, #1 option type player. They have been building for that moment. I would have rather seen them rebuild thru the draft, but that ship has sailed and they have been ignoring that route for 20+ years so it isn’t happening
god shammgod wrote:the people thinking keeping obi is a priority are really buying into the last couple of weeks way too much. with the guys we have, you need him to play d and hit the 3 and he was no better at julius last year at those things and he played against backups. he needed that last month just to shoot the same lousy percentage from 3 as julius.