xKLNx Phenom wrote:Well.... jstarks actually admitted it, and 2010 has proof of an email.. What else do you need?
We also have proof of you circumventing the Rules again, but notice that I gave you a pass as well this 1 time.
2010 wrote:NYStateofMind wrote:But that was his prerogative. If he had known he was going to have to deal with this, I'm sure he wouldn't have ever admitted to who he originally took, and rightfully so. And if he had done that, then what could we have done about it? Just because he fell into the trap of releasing the name to you (seemingly to help you out), shouldn't mean he gets punished for that. Unless someone physically sees the original pick, and has indisputable evidence without baiting the guy into saying it, I say you have to let him keep the player.
I'm not making a big deal. To be honest I'm not interested in McGee or Favors. We just need GMs to understand once you make your pick and you hit that "submit" button it is etched in stone. But I'm cool on it. Hey man, I'm just tryna play by the rules as should everyone else.
Indeed. As I alluded to before, it's just a learning experience for future BATs to keep a closer eye on Selections when you're on and for GMs to try less and less to circumvent the Rules.
===============================================
Now let's just move on to the next GM to create a controversy.
Anyone up for Drafting Stephon Marbury?
--Mags