Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks
MrDollarBills wrote:I'm not a fan of trading down if Hunter or Abdul-Carter are in play.
If Mara thinks this team is winning more than 6 games next year he is worse off than I thought. We need to focus on improving and development.
TerrenceClarke wrote:Any Giant fan that would support this move would be bugging.
Colin Cowheard was saying the rams want the 3rd pick. He didnt say these exact words, but he basically was saying that Schoen and Daboll are desperate,cause they have a mandate to win this year. And that this rumor has a lot of legs behind it.
He said the rams are looking to rebuild and that they are tired of the stuff that surronds stafford, with his wife etc etc.
Synciere wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:Any Giant fan that would support this move would be bugging.
Colin Cowheard was saying the rams want the 3rd pick. He didnt say these exact words, but he basically was saying that Schoen and Daboll are desperate,cause they have a mandate to win this year. And that this rumor has a lot of legs behind it.
He said the rams are looking to rebuild and that they are tired of the stuff that surronds stafford, with his wife etc etc.
Yeah of course the 3 pick should be off the table. Mina Kimes in her most recent pod was talking about trading first round picks plus Stafford and how she would do that if she was a Giants fan. The Rams are picking 26th. I’m still a no to trading the 3 pick for a 37 year old qb.
GONYK wrote:
Ward and Sanders working out against each other and talking a whole lotta sh*t
Is it just me or is Sanders always pretty quick to throw his teammates under the bus? Cam even calls him out for it ~14:30.
DOT wrote:I'm not saying I want it to happen
But y'all letting Saquon walk only to the next year draft a RB 3rd overall would objectively be funny
I don't think you'd take him 3rd, I think y'all are doing due diligence and seeing who would be available if you traded down. Least I hope you guys wouldn't take him 3rd.
Ghetto Gospel wrote:we scheduled a meeting with ashton jeanty for fcking what. clown ass org
MrDollarBills wrote:Ghetto Gospel wrote:we scheduled a meeting with ashton jeanty for fcking what. clown ass org
That would mean we'd be trading back to draft a RB in Round 1.
Schoen cannot be that stupid. He can't. Take BPA and move on
MrDollarBills wrote:Ranaan is saying the Giants are going in on Stafford.
I'm not sure about this either tbh because I don't think we can sacrifice a 2nd round pick either.
FrozenEnvelope wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Ranaan is saying the Giants are going in on Stafford.
I'm not sure about this either tbh because I don't think we can sacrifice a 2nd round pick either.
37 year old Stafford making $50M to play 10 games and end up 4-13.
MrDollarBills wrote:Ranaan is saying the Giants are going in on Stafford.
I'm not sure about this either tbh because I don't think we can sacrifice a 2nd round pick either.
mpharris36 wrote:FrozenEnvelope wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Ranaan is saying the Giants are going in on Stafford.
I'm not sure about this either tbh because I don't think we can sacrifice a 2nd round pick either.
37 year old Stafford making $50M to play 10 games and end up 4-13.
look at the positives if thats the case then we are picking at the top of the draft again both the HC/GM are fired
DOT wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Ranaan is saying the Giants are going in on Stafford.
I'm not sure about this either tbh because I don't think we can sacrifice a 2nd round pick either.
On the bright side
When it fails, you'll at least get to clean house and start fresh with a rookie QB and new head coach at the same time, rather than a HC on the hot seat who can't let the rookie QB develop and is trying to squeeze as many wins as possible out of the roster to save his job.
MrDollarBills wrote:DOT wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:Ranaan is saying the Giants are going in on Stafford.
I'm not sure about this either tbh because I don't think we can sacrifice a 2nd round pick either.
On the bright side
When it fails, you'll at least get to clean house and start fresh with a rookie QB and new head coach at the same time, rather than a HC on the hot seat who can't let the rookie QB develop and is trying to squeeze as many wins as possible out of the roster to save his job.
I really don't understand why we're even doing this. No one makes good decisions as a lame duck.
FrozenEnvelope wrote:mpharris36 wrote:FrozenEnvelope wrote:
37 year old Stafford making $50M to play 10 games and end up 4-13.
look at the positives if thats the case then we are picking at the top of the draft again both the HC/GM are fired
Very good point!
DOT wrote:MrDollarBills wrote:DOT wrote:On the bright side
When it fails, you'll at least get to clean house and start fresh with a rookie QB and new head coach at the same time, rather than a HC on the hot seat who can't let the rookie QB develop and is trying to squeeze as many wins as possible out of the roster to save his job.
I really don't understand why we're even doing this. No one makes good decisions as a lame duck.
Because at the end of the day, the decisions are made by owners, who are not necessarily the most qualified people to run an organization
Honestly, I don't get it either. Only thing I can think is Mara really believes the roster outside of QB is good, and either doesn't want Ward/Shedeur or doesn't think they'll be there at 3.