PennytoShaq wrote:pepe1991 wrote:PennytoShaq wrote:
Unfortunately that was all offensive stats still based on plus minus, which has already been debunked as a stat to base an argument on. You just keep going back to the well over and over since it's apparently all you have.
And you still miss the entire point. The team is now playing a wing based offense instead of a post offense with Vuc. It is much better to watch, more energy, and team is competing much harder. Last night was easy evidence of this.
No one thinks Biz is good at offense. No one is making that argument.
Biased opinion. in 4 of 6 games without Vuć they didn't even reach their season average in ppg. I alredy posted how much efficiency for Evan and Gordon actually dropped since Vuc is out.
Net rating counts points differential in 100 possessions. BIyombo has -14,3. How da hell is that only offensive stat? Stats should
exclude him from that because he is not capable of playing offense? Can we exclude half of his salary since he isn't capable of playing 50% of sport he plays for money ?
And no, you didn't debunked anything, you just decide to ignore offense like it's not part of the basketball when it comes to him. Turning blind eye on his inabaility to look like basketball player whenever he crosses halfcourt from D to O.
Nope, I made the observation that the team is playing faster with more energy and fight than prior. And based on games like last nights, the Nets game, the Heat game that we barely lost - I am right. And again, many others have made this observation in game threads, not just myself.
You came barreling in with rambling accusations towards me that have nothing to do with what I was saying. And they still really don't. Your argument of plus minus has been torn apart and you are basically changing the argument now every single post, while my message has stayed the same.
I give up , winning debates on internet isn't on top of my priorities and you keep ignoring stats and facts and keep talking about " looking better in barley lost to Nets" . Irony in that is amazing.